Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Canelo
64
45%
Lara
77
55%
 
Total votes: 141

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by crusader »

I'm not a Cuban worshiper at all. I think they're often overrated simply because they're Cuban, and I think Lara in particular has been overrated for years. If I wanted someone to win the fight last night it was Alvarez, and there is a good case that he did win, but I saw it the other way by a few rounds.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

Horse wrote:Cubans = boxing cancer.

I despise their style with every fibre of my being. They are the antithesis of everything worthwhile.

Their support on this site makes me question the purpose of living.

I don't understand humanity. What's the point?
Is your purpose of living watching phone booth fights ? How pathetic :verysad:
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ttornado »

ikorolev wrote:
Horse wrote:Cubans = boxing cancer.

I despise their style with every fibre of my being. They are the antithesis of everything worthwhile.

Their support on this site makes me question the purpose of living.

I don't understand humanity. What's the point?
Is your purpose of living watching phone booth fights ? How pathetic :verysad:
Horse does have a penchant for hyperbole. He also places Rigondeaux at #5 p4p. So words and actions don't always align.
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ReggieDiggs »

ikorolev wrote:
Horse wrote:Cubans = boxing cancer.

I despise their style with every fibre of my being. They are the antithesis of everything worthwhile.

Their support on this site makes me question the purpose of living.

I don't understand humanity. What's the point?
Is your purpose of living watching phone booth fights ? How pathetic :verysad:
Fwiw anything that makes Horse question his life I'm gonna be for more often then not. VIVA CUBA!!!
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ReggieDiggs »

crusader wrote:I'm not a Cuban worshiper at all. I think they're often overrated simply because they're Cuban, and I think Lara in particular has been overrated for years. If I wanted someone to win the fight last night it was Alvarez, and there is a good case that he did win, but I saw it the other way by a few rounds.
Idk how the main 3 Cubans everyone talks about are overrated & idk that anyone besides them get all that much hype to even be considered overrated. And Erislandy easily could have gotten the nod last nite. Idk how overrated a guy can be who barely loses to the #1 guy in his division.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by crusader »

For years I've heard from many people that Lara would thrash everyone in the division, including Canelo, when more often than not he'd give lackluster performances that didn't correspond with those predictions. The same people also seemed to forget that he was held to a draw by and arguably deserved to lose to Carlos Molina, who gets rated highly by very few.

Rigo is overrated in my opinion because he regularly appears in the upper-half of P4P lists (like Horse's) even though Donaire is his only standout win and he had problems with Marroquin and Cordoba. To me, he hasn't done enough to show that he's as good as many people say he is, whether in terms of resume or ability.

As for other Cubans, from what I've gleaned from posts on various forums they get more highly praised and more attention is given to them than to non-Cuban fighters with comparable records and performances. I think much of that has to do with the veneration for the Cuban boxing program, which leads many to conclude that if someone was raised in that program they must be particularly good and have the potential to be a top pro.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by crusader »

verballistic wrote:
MachoTime wrote:Canelo won. It was a close fight considering Lara got a 115-113 given score his way. Canelo definitely won this fight.
Agreed...I was rooting for Lara, but he definitely let his fans down in this one with his poor showing. Let your stinking hands go next time. :OhYes:
According to CompuBox he threw only 29 fewer punches than Canelo. When Lara was 'running' Alvarez wasn't doing much punching himself, and he typically threw single shots.

The 'running' is being blown out of proportion. It's not like he was moving the entire time and never bothered to punch.

http://www.BS.com/forums/view. ... a-compubox
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by crusader »

So you're not letting your hands go by jabbing?
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by CheckHook »

The idea that Lara is over rated I really don't understand. Even if you scored that fight for Canelo then Lara still had a very close fight with a guy who The Ring magazine have in their top 10 p4p and many people talk about like he's the future of boxing.... If anyone is over rated its obviously Canelo.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by crusader »

CheckHook wrote:The idea that Lara is over rated I really don't understand. Even if you scored that fight for Canelo then Lara still had a very close fight with a guy who The Ring magazine have in their top 10 p4p and many people talk about like he's the future of boxing.... If anyone is over rated its obviously Canelo.
He might not be overrated after last night (or even after the Angulo fight). My post was about the last few years in general.
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by kidbazooka1 »

Lara is legit no doubt about that.

Imo Lara beats any other jmw he just lost a close one last that's it.
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by scallum »

Boxing Writer wrote:Lara 115:113. But I'm interested in this question: is Canelo the first fighter in history of boxing who won 12-round fight landing only 24 punches to the head (according to CompuBox)?
Professional boxing clean effective punches are same to head n body. Lara only threw 10 more punches but his were the pitty pat Amatuer types punches, Canelo landing way more hurt punches
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by SenorPipino »

There was only one winner...Canelo 116-112.
After a tight first 4 rounds, Canelo simply imposed his strength on Lara.
Much bigger, much stronger. It looked like a middleweight vs. a welterweight.
Lara wanted no part of the physical Canelo.
The Mexican won going away. But someone should tell the kid that it´s okay to move your head. Saw no ability to slip a punch to the head.
Didn`t matter against the light punching Lara. It might matter when Canelo moves up to middleweight and he faces some stronger bangers who won´t be pushed around by him.
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by scallum »

Lara won the fight if that was an Olympic fight, professional boxing is about landing meaniful punches
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Final round »

and Lara landed the more meaningful punches
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ReggieDiggs »

crusader wrote:For years I've heard from many people that Lara would thrash everyone in the division, including Canelo, when more often than not he'd give lackluster performances that didn't correspond with those predictions. The same people also seemed to forget that he was held to a draw by and arguably deserved to lose to Carlos Molina, who gets rated highly by very few.

Rigo is overrated in my opinion because he regularly appears in the upper-half of P4P lists (like Horse's) even though Donaire is his only standout win and he had problems with Marroquin and Cordoba. To me, he hasn't done enough to show that he's as good as many people say he is, whether in terms of resume or ability.

As for other Cubans, from what I've gleaned from posts on various forums they get more highly praised and more attention is given to them than to non-Cuban fighters with comparable records and performances. I think much of that has to do with the veneration for the Cuban boxing program, which leads many to conclude that if someone was raised in that program they must be particularly good and have the potential to be a top pro.
Fair enough on the Erislandy & Guillermo assessments. I think if they weren't Cuban it'd be the same difference, but we're not gonna Agree about them I suppose.

As for the allure of the Cuban amateur system I definitely understand & somewhat agree with your overall thoughts there, but for me that background represents a higher level of trial by fire than the average boxer has been though & it does get some extra respect because of that fact. I remember how I used to see a guy in those old gold Kronk trunks & how that represented something more then some guy from Idaho in his camo trunks represented. For me it's the same deal with these Cuban amateur system guys.
Brut
Super Middleweight
Posts: 184
Joined: 18 Feb 2013, 13:56

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Brut »

SenorPipino wrote:There was only one winner...Canelo 116-112.
After a tight first 4 rounds, Canelo simply imposed his strength on Lara.
Much bigger, much stronger. It looked like a middleweight vs. a welterweight.
Lara wanted no part of the physical Canelo.
The Mexican won going away. But someone should tell the kid that it´s okay to move your head. Saw no ability to slip a punch to the head.
Didn`t matter against the light punching Lara. It might matter when Canelo moves up to middleweight and he faces some stronger bangers who won´t be pushed around by him.
This!!
Brut
Super Middleweight
Posts: 184
Joined: 18 Feb 2013, 13:56

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Brut »

SenorPipino wrote:There was only one winner...Canelo 116-112.
After a tight first 4 rounds, Canelo simply imposed his strength on Lara.
Much bigger, much stronger. It looked like a middleweight vs. a welterweight.
Lara wanted no part of the physical Canelo.
The Mexican won going away. But someone should tell the kid that it´s okay to move your head. Saw no ability to slip a punch to the head.
Didn`t matter against the light punching Lara. It might matter when Canelo moves up to middleweight and he faces some stronger bangers who won´t be pushed around by him.
This!!
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I thought Lara edged it, 115-113 either way. Canelo's body shots were the only thing he did effectively all night. That being said, no way Lara was getting a nod in a fight that tight. I was shocked he caught one of the cards.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

Brut wrote:
SenorPipino wrote:There was only one winner...Canelo 116-112.
After a tight first 4 rounds, Canelo simply imposed his strength on Lara.
Much bigger, much stronger. It looked like a middleweight vs. a welterweight.
Lara wanted no part of the physical Canelo.
The Mexican won going away. But someone should tell the kid that it´s okay to move your head. Saw no ability to slip a punch to the head.
Didn`t matter against the light punching Lara. It might matter when Canelo moves up to middleweight and he faces some stronger bangers who won´t be pushed around by him.
This!!
I suspect that the only reason that always pro-skill Brut agrees with Canelo win is that Lara win would put him on collision course with Mayweather ...
NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by NateJR »

ikorolev wrote:
Brut wrote:
SenorPipino wrote:There was only one winner...Canelo 116-112.
After a tight first 4 rounds, Canelo simply imposed his strength on Lara.
Much bigger, much stronger. It looked like a middleweight vs. a welterweight.
Lara wanted no part of the physical Canelo.
The Mexican won going away. But someone should tell the kid that it´s okay to move your head. Saw no ability to slip a punch to the head.
Didn`t matter against the light punching Lara. It might matter when Canelo moves up to middleweight and he faces some stronger bangers who won´t be pushed around by him.
This!!
I suspect that the only reason that always pro-skill Brut agrees with Canelo win is that Lara win would put him on collision course with Mayweather ...
You seem to have the opposite motives. So stop being a troll and worrying about Brut every damn chance you get. You know he's a Floyd fan, we know you're Floyd hater.. What's the difference? You follow him around like some teenage boy picking on the girl he likes all the time, stop being such a douche.. Just saying.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by ikorolev »

NateJR wrote:
ikorolev wrote: I suspect that the only reason that always pro-skill Brut agrees with Canelo win is that Lara win would put him on collision course with Mayweather ...
You seem to have the opposite motives. So stop being a troll and worrying about Brut every damn chance you get. You know he's a Floyd fan, we know you're Floyd hater.. What's the difference? You follow him around like some teenage boy picking on the girl he likes all the time, stop being such a douche.. Just saying.
I am not a Floyd hater, and I am not the only one who sees one reason in most of Brut's posts. Being a fan of Floyd, BHop, Andre, Bradley and other fighters who are known for their defensive skills (and low work rate for some of them), he refuses to give Lara the same treatment. If any of the fighters I named were in Lara's place, they would be declared winners by judges and Brut.
Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Impractical Poster »

I picked Canelo. The landed punches were very close, as was the fight. But I edged it in Canelo's favor because he was trying hard to make the fight. If he could have effectively cut off the ring, it would have been a decisive win for Alvarez.
big train express
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 154
Joined: 19 Jun 2006, 00:28

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by big train express »

Lara outboxed him. It was close, but Lara was the clear winner.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Canelo-Lara , Who won?

Post by Final round »

115/113 Lara
Post Reply