Fury v Chisora OFF

expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:I'm not sure when this happened, but in the WBO's latest rankings, Derrick is the number one contender. Presumably he doesn't need to even fight Fury "for the right" to challenge Wlad.

Like everyone else I really want to see Chisora / Fury 2, but its a bit strange when you consider Derrick is already the top contender. He doesn't need the fight. Fury does - in terms of becoming a mandatory challenger.

What is Derrick gaining from the fight ? Because, when he loses to Fury, and has forfeit his top ranking with the WBO, he might wonder if this was the best option for him ?
He needs to fight someone to become mandatory, if you're ranked 1 with the IBF then you're mandatory, but with the WBO it just means you're currently top of the pile, if #2 and #3 were to fight each other, Chisora would drop down to #2 and the winner would replace him at the top. Fighting Fury in an eliminator should guarantee the winner the mandatory position when it comes up. Without an eliminator it's pot luck with the WBO, they decide they feel like calling a mandatory and when they do it's just whoever happens to be #1 at that stage, that was how Ricky Burns got the Martinez fight.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by broomy7s »

Just seen this from a mirror journo.

allegedly is trying to find a new opponent for Fury for Saturday, but fighters are asking for too much because they know he is desperate.
PokerRob
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 424
Joined: 19 May 2012, 11:09

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by PokerRob »

Does anyone have an idea what the purse split was before the injury? If Dereck still gets paid anything? And if Tyson still gets paid anything, even if he does not find a replacement?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by bripez »

broomy7s wrote:Just seen this from a mirror journo.

allegedly is trying to find a new opponent for Fury for Saturday, but fighters are asking for too much because they know he is desperate.
Great journalism ..... a vague comment that actually supports FW as this is just giving him an excuse when he does not find a replacement.

If the "journalist" is going to make such a comment, then they should find out exactly how much is being offered and how much boxers are wanting (in pound notes - and include any extras or options etc.).

Also, what do you expect ? - a boxer to get a call on a Tuesday night asking if they want to fight Fury on the Saturday ? - surely they need to be compensated appropriately ?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Andrew »

Finn wrote:just seen BJS has tweeted Eubank jr saying he will cancel his european title and fight him on saturday instead if he's up for it as the headliner
Billy is coming across as a bit of a nob here.

He is 2-3 years ahead of Eubank now and should just ignore him. Showing immaturity being wound up here. He may aswell just mention he is nowhere near my level and not get worked up.

Euabnk could be at that level now but either isn't aresed are likely being protected as he isn't that good.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Finn »

bripez wrote:
broomy7s wrote:Just seen this from a mirror journo.

allegedly is trying to find a new opponent for Fury for Saturday, but fighters are asking for too much because they know he is desperate.
Great journalism ..... a vague comment that actually supports FW as this is just giving him an excuse when he does not find a replacement.

If the "journalist" is going to make such a comment, then they should find out exactly how much is being offered and how much boxers are wanting (in pound notes - and include any extras or options etc.).

Also, what do you expect ? - a boxer to get a call on a Tuesday night asking if they want to fight Fury on the Saturday ? - surely they need to be compensated appropriately ?
ttue however if someone really wants a shot they shoul be willing to fight for £25-30k even if its on the understaning they will get an under are place on another event if they want it. Audley is rich and has fought in prize fighter for around that figure before he says he wants a decent opponent he should be offering his services for peanuts just for the chance. Just an example.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by black panther »

Finn wrote:
bripez wrote:
broomy7s wrote:Just seen this from a mirror journo.

allegedly is trying to find a new opponent for Fury for Saturday, but fighters are asking for too much because they know he is desperate.
Great journalism ..... a vague comment that actually supports FW as this is just giving him an excuse when he does not find a replacement.

If the "journalist" is going to make such a comment, then they should find out exactly how much is being offered and how much boxers are wanting (in pound notes - and include any extras or options etc.).

Also, what do you expect ? - a boxer to get a call on a Tuesday night asking if they want to fight Fury on the Saturday ? - surely they need to be compensated appropriately ?
ttue however if someone really wants a shot they shoul be willing to fight for £25-30k even if its on the understaning they will get an under are place on another event if they want it. Audley is rich and has fought in prize fighter for around that figure before he says he wants a decent opponent he should be offering his services for peanuts just for the chance. Just an example.

Na depends what your motivation is pal. Tiger Thompson probably doesn't have many years left in the game and will be looking to make as much money as he can whilst he's still able to fight at the highest level.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by danconnollyeire »

Haha 2 hours before it was announced Del pulled out Fury was tweeting 'don't dare pull out'. Jinxed it!
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by bripez »

Finn wrote:
bripez wrote:
broomy7s wrote:Just seen this from a mirror journo.

allegedly is trying to find a new opponent for Fury for Saturday, but fighters are asking for too much because they know he is desperate.
Great journalism ..... a vague comment that actually supports FW as this is just giving him an excuse when he does not find a replacement.

If the "journalist" is going to make such a comment, then they should find out exactly how much is being offered and how much boxers are wanting (in pound notes - and include any extras or options etc.).

Also, what do you expect ? - a boxer to get a call on a Tuesday night asking if they want to fight Fury on the Saturday ? - surely they need to be compensated appropriately ?
ttue however if someone really wants a shot they shoul be willing to fight for £25-30k even if its on the understaning they will get an under are place on another event if they want it. Audley is rich and has fought in prize fighter for around that figure before he says he wants a decent opponent he should be offering his services for peanuts just for the chance. Just an example.
So you would expect a heavyweight who may be sat at home and possibly ticking over in training to take on an unbeaten 6 foot 8 boxer who has been in full time training for 6 months, for £25k (will have £10k in his pocket after manager/promoter/taxes) at 4 days notice ?
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Finn »

I expect fighters who aren't going to get a better fight any point who have been in sparring camps etc bee to take the shot that is there. Its not un realist audley said he would fight chambers last minute, Thompson and tarver are both offering to fight it all depends what they are willing to get paid. Which doea tarver need £10k or a fight at hw?
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by sweetscience »

danconnollyeire wrote:Haha 2 hours before it was announced Del pulled out Fury was tweeting 'don't dare pull out'. Jinxed it!
I presumed he just knew 2hrs before it was announced ??
jamiedavies02
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 158
Joined: 14 Oct 2011, 10:26

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by jamiedavies02 »

Still no word from Eventim or Fwank RE Refunds etc.
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2185
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by tony1234 »

I guess if Tyson fights anyone then that is the kibosh for refunds, maybe that is why they are looking for someone ?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by leforge »

Viktor Vaughn wrote:They're looking for a replacement. Tickets can be used on Sat, held back for the rearranged date or you can apply for a refund.
Do you think rematch will happen?
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by JimJim2009 »

Their local paper ran a new update at 3pm today after speaking with Peter; they're aiming to be fighting on Sat night, the opponent should be sorted by Thurs, it won't be Thompson, and its looking like Sept for the return with Chisora.

http://www.thevisitor.co.uk/sport/boxin ... -1-6743285
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Sklar »

JimJim2009 wrote:Their local paper ran a new update at 3pm today after speaking with Peter; they're aiming to be fighting on Sat night, the opponent should be sorted by Thurs, it won't be Thompson, and its looking like Sept for the return with Chisora.

http://www.thevisitor.co.uk/sport/boxin ... -1-6743285
Fair dos if they do rustle up an opponent. People shouldn't get their hopes up for anything more than a huge scrabble scoring named eurobum though - anything else would be too dicey.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by broomy7s »

Fair play to queensbury on the refunds front.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Andrew »

Nothing on the arena or warrens site but BS claim it will be

1. Use your ticket(s) for the show this Saturday

2. Keep your ticket(s) to exchange for a new ticket(s) to a rescheduled Chisora v Fury fight

3. Return your ticket(s) to Eventim within 28 days for a refund of the full face value

http://www.BS.com/fury-chisora ... ill--80194
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Andrew »

You have to ask will it be rescheduled ??

Also ticket sales were poor for this even now there will be less fans going on Saturday.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by DMA1987 »

In terms of percentage how many people have bought tickets due to the undercard fighters? I imagine a decent amount.
GlobalBox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2037
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 02:57

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by GlobalBox »

I hope I am wrong but wondering if it could be James Toney as the replacement, Toney was due to fight in Riga this Saturday against Dennis Bakhtov but that has been called off today and Bakhtov is now fighting Airich. Now its probably just that the fight was never going to happen but Toney had been in the gym and conditioning (such as it is) etc so clearly at some point he was either going
to fight or considering it.

He would definately come for a wedge of money and I know its not a good fight in any shape or form but its a name (albeit) one who has long seen better days, its a no risk fight as well as Fury
would win and win at a canter.

Still as I say I hope I am wrong, my original guesses would have been Pala or Gerber.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by palooka »

Yeah, Gethin will be taking thousands and thousands.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by Finn »

Audleys just tweeted that he will take the fight in a heartbeat.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by JimJim2009 »

palooka wrote:Yeah, Gethin will be taking thousands and thousands.
:OhYes:
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Fury v Chisora OFF

Post by DMA1987 »

palooka wrote:Yeah, Gethin will be taking thousands and thousands.
Was more thinking Flanagan, Smith, Saunders (both) etc.

But cheers for lobbing the obvious non ticket seller on there Palooka, good lad.

It's just with the rumoured poor ticket sales, I wondered how many of the sales stand apart from the actual main event. It's a legitimate question.
Post Reply