Manchester RBR
Re: Manchester RBR
Well, that might change a few opinions
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Manchester RBR
Yeah good shot and a very good win.
Re: Manchester RBR
Still not totally sold.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Manchester RBR
Well done Saunders, cracking shot.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Manchester RBR
Blandamura seemed to have his mouth open when the shot landed and that just amplifies everything.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32997
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Manchester RBR
Can't see Saunders going much above this level tho.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Manchester RBR
Not really. He landed a peach for sure but...he can't hope to be bailed out like that every time he's having problems...a harder puncher than Blandamura would have had him in trouble.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
Re: Manchester RBR
Always nice to see good sportsmanship at the end.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Manchester RBR
Outside shout on a Dq? He ran through the ref to throw 2 punches on his opponent.
Re: Manchester RBR
Quillin would put him up queer street I think.Boxing Prospect wrote:Not really. He landed a peach for sure but...he can't hope to be bailed out like that every time he's having problems...a harder puncher than Blandamura would have had him in trouble.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
Re: Manchester RBR
Ring rust and against an awkward opponent - never going to look goodcolumbo wrote:Still not totally sold.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
Re: Manchester RBR
Would others agree that it was a very good win? By most accounts it seems like BJS was really struggling...jameswilson wrote:Yeah good shot and a very good win.
Last edited by crusader on 26 Jul 2014, 17:42, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Manchester RBR
LOL BJS on the mike.
Re: Manchester RBR
Yeah but ive felt that way about him for awhile.rossij8 wrote:Ring rust and against an awkward opponent - never going to look goodcolumbo wrote:Still not totally sold.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
Re: Manchester RBR
Why shouldn't you be, a big shot saved him as the fight looked like it was slipping away. Eubank jnr vrs BJS anyone?columbo wrote:Still not totally sold.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
Re: Manchester RBR
Why is fans in quotes? Pretty ridiculous to question whether someone is a fan just because they dislike Bunce, if that's what you're suggesting.crusader wrote:Me too, mate. Seems boxing 'fans' these days have to dislike half the people involved in the sport to be 'real'.
And have you seen how he treated people here when he posted? He was very arrogant and condescending.[/quote]
I never put fans in quotes because they dislike Bunce, Mr Crusader. My point was that so many 'fans' nowadays think they need to dislike certain aspects of boxing because it gives them credibility. I don't like watching Floyd or Wlad as their styles bore me (I liked them both early on in their careers) but I won't call them names or slag them off. I'm from an older generation though & I realise that boxing is more like football now where you pick sides.
And I can see how you think Bunce was arrogant. Fair point. I saw it as passionate but it's swings and roundabouts.
But my post was about people feeling the need to slag off boxing people because they think it gives them credibility.
Re: Manchester RBR
If this was on Sky they'd be having kittens with BJS' gutter language!
Re: Manchester RBR
"Euwank Junior" hahahacolumbo wrote:LOL BJS on the mike.
Re: Manchester RBR
It was a great shot but against the likes of Quillin, Korobov, even Eubank Jnr I think you're gonna need more than that.Neil Gee wrote:Why shouldn't you be, a big shot saved him as the fight looked like it was slipping away. Eubank jnr vrs BJS anyone?columbo wrote:Still not totally sold.rossij8 wrote:Well, that might change a few opinions
-
Manchester Hitman
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56
Re: Manchester RBR
Forget all talk of Peter Quillon that will be a Step to far at least for a while anyway- I want to see BJS v Eubank before the end of the year. Perhaps if we're going to be subjected to this Chisora - Fury nonsense again then if this was the chief support then I would get behind it
Re: Manchester RBR
So was this just a tougher than expected bout in which Blandamura had his moments despite BJS generally being in control? Or was Blandamura right there with/ahead of him?
Re: Manchester RBR
I think BJS was pretty much in control on the whole and in the majority of the rounds had the edge but Blandamura wasnt completely out of the fight.crusader wrote:So was this just a tougher than expected bout in which Blandamura had his moments despite BJS generally being in control? Or was Blandamura right there with/ahead of him?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13499
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Manchester RBR
Yeah that would be a superb top 2 on the bill and would surely pull a hell of a crowd.Manchester Hitman wrote:Forget all talk of Peter Quillon that will be a Step to far at least for a while anyway- I want to see BJS v Eubank before the end of the year. Perhaps if we're going to be subjected to this Chisora - Fury nonsense again then if this was the chief support then I would get behind it
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Manchester RBR
Saunders doesn't need him. He's well above Euwank jnr.
But he clearly wants it basically because he doesn't like him.
Be good to see. Doubt Fwank wants it though.
But he clearly wants it basically because he doesn't like him.
Be good to see. Doubt Fwank wants it though.
Re: Manchester RBR
I see. Reading the posts here and seeing Detroit's score on the other forum made me think that BJS was really struggling.columbo wrote:I think BJS was pretty much in control on the whole and in the majority of the rounds had the edge but Blandamura wasnt completely out of the fight.crusader wrote:So was this just a tougher than expected bout in which Blandamura had his moments despite BJS generally being in control? Or was Blandamura right there with/ahead of him?