Fury fight off

Locked
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Manchester Hitman »

I see Robert Smith is there on a jolly
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Fury fight off

Post by JimJim2009 »

Manchester Hitman wrote:I see Robert Smith is there on a jolly
And feels sorry for Fwank too. Nice to see they're buddies again after that Haye/Chisora fuss :OhYes:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Fury fight off

Post by palooka »

handsofstone wrote:
palooka wrote:Mr Warren has just said that something happened during routine surgery and that Tyson's uncle was in a very critical state.
I thought Fwank looked like he was gonna break down
Yeah, he looked under a lot of pressure.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Fury fight off

Post by SNG »

TheCobra wrote:I must say this is really annoying and poor form. I kept on my subscription to allegedly cos of this fight and now it's gone. Cancelling it after tonight, sick of the Warren nonsense, I rarely stay up late for the other cards and end up catching repeats when I already know the result. Can't really be arsed if I'm honest it's been a poor channel so far since I subbed.
So it's a bad channel because you don't want to stay up to watch fights and learn the result before the repeats? Blaming Warren for Fury pulling out and using it to have a go at the channel? :lol:

I don't know why some of you ever signed up.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Fury fight off

Post by TheCobra »

SNG wrote:
TheCobra wrote:I must say this is really annoying and poor form. I kept on my subscription to allegedly cos of this fight and now it's gone. Cancelling it after tonight, sick of the Warren nonsense, I rarely stay up late for the other cards and end up catching repeats when I already know the result. Can't really be arsed if I'm honest it's been a poor channel so far since I subbed.
So it's a bad channel because you don't want to stay up to watch fights and learn the result before the repeats? Blaming Warren for Fury pulling out and using it to have a go at the channel? :lol:

I don't know why some of you ever signed up.
It's pretty crap for the money in general. Warren's lost lots of the key British people so can't put many decent British scraps on, I gave it a try and off my experience so far it hasn't been worth a tenner a month.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Fury fight off

Post by SNG »

TheCobra wrote:
SNG wrote:
TheCobra wrote:I must say this is really annoying and poor form. I kept on my subscription to allegedly cos of this fight and now it's gone. Cancelling it after tonight, sick of the Warren nonsense, I rarely stay up late for the other cards and end up catching repeats when I already know the result. Can't really be arsed if I'm honest it's been a poor channel so far since I subbed.
So it's a bad channel because you don't want to stay up to watch fights and learn the result before the repeats? Blaming Warren for Fury pulling out and using it to have a go at the channel? :lol:

I don't know why some of you ever signed up.
It's pretty crap for the money in general. Warren's lost lots of the key British people so can't put many decent British scraps on, I gave it a try and off my experience so far it hasn't been worth a tenner a month.
You got SKY? I'd drop that first, personally.

Perhaps interest in overseas stuff sways me but it's an easy tenner a month for me. Only thing that fucks me off is lack of HD on virgin.
Karl Jade
Cruiserweight
Posts: 734
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 16:40

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Karl Jade »

Why would anyone have sympathy for Fury after the ridiculous disrespect he's given to the likes of Chisora, Haye, Lewis and Klitschko? He deserves nothing but bad luck.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Mimmy »

broomy7s wrote:Isn't Fury's mrs pregnant? Really hoping it's nothing to do with that. Wishing the Fury's all the best.

So is Fury's mrs also his uncle? It is reasonable though.
Wa1nuts
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 515
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 10:01

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Wa1nuts »

allegedly is brilliant value for money. We get most of the top international cards included in the twelve pound a month, aswell as the 24/7 and all access programmes, 're runs of old classic fights and Warrens cards. In America you would pay 60 dollars for each ppv.

Compare that to sky sports which is considerably more expensive.

Personally I'll be cancelling Sky Sports next week. The amount of money they charge just isn't worth it. Some of Eddies cards are pretty good, but most are average, overhyped fighters against poor fighters, can guess who will every fight nine times out of ten. I know this is true for other promoters, but I find Matchroom cards are the worst for it. Also I cannot stand Jim Watt as a commentator.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Fury fight off

Post by gobbles »

SNG wrote:
TheCobra wrote: It's pretty crap for the money in general. Warren's lost lots of the key British people so can't put many decent British scraps on, I gave it a try and off my experience so far it hasn't been worth a tenner a month.
You got SKY? I'd drop that first, personally.

Perhaps interest in overseas stuff sways me but it's an easy tenner a month for me. Only thing that fucks me off is lack of HD on virgin.
If you are a boxing fan, and I presume anyone on here is, allegedly is fabulous value for money compared to the £70-odd quid I pay for Sky.
Yes, Sky is a multi-sports channel, but boxing is my favourite sport. And if the last Sky show in Liverpool is anything to go by, we are going back to a WWE style TV presentation, where for your huge subscription, the regular programming is just providing a build-up to their Pay-per-view shows.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury fight off

Post by lefty »

TheCobra wrote:
SNG wrote:
TheCobra wrote:I must say this is really annoying and poor form. I kept on my subscription to allegedly cos of this fight and now it's gone. Cancelling it after tonight, sick of the Warren nonsense, I rarely stay up late for the other cards and end up catching repeats when I already know the result. Can't really be arsed if I'm honest it's been a poor channel so far since I subbed.
So it's a bad channel because you don't want to stay up to watch fights and learn the result before the repeats? Blaming Warren for Fury pulling out and using it to have a go at the channel? :lol:

I don't know why some of you ever signed up.
It's pretty crap for the money in general. Warren's lost lots of the key British people so can't put many decent British scraps on, I gave it a try and off my experience so far it hasn't been worth a tenner a month.
The international fights are worth it alone. I couldnt really care about the domestic crap.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Fury fight off

Post by gobbles »

I also got a letter last week saying my Sky subscription is going up by £4 per month.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32999
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Boxerbeetle »

gobbles wrote:I also got a letter last week saying my Sky subscription is going up by £4 per month.
I'm seriously considering cancelling Sky Sports, been realising recently how little I watch of it apart from boxing.

Am a big football fan as well but end up missing a lot of games & I have a season ticket for my home team so I get my main football fix from that.

It's just not worth paying 20-25 odd quid a month for Matchroom cards stacked with mismatches, and Froch is basically PPV only anyway now so it costs extra again to watch him!
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Fury fight off

Post by funso banjo baby »

gobbles wrote:
SNG wrote:
TheCobra wrote: It's pretty crap for the money in general. Warren's lost lots of the key British people so can't put many decent British scraps on, I gave it a try and off my experience so far it hasn't been worth a tenner a month.
You got SKY? I'd drop that first, personally.

Perhaps interest in overseas stuff sways me but it's an easy tenner a month for me. Only thing that fucks me off is lack of HD on virgin.
If you are a boxing fan, and I presume anyone on here is, allegedly is fabulous value for money compared to the £70-odd quid I pay for Sky.
Yes, Sky is a multi-sports channel, but boxing is my favourite sport. And if the last Sky show in Liverpool is anything to go by, we are going back to a WWE style TV presentation, where for your huge subscription, the regular programming is just providing a build-up to their Pay-per-view shows.


pay per view is not good
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Fury fight off

Post by TheCobra »

I'm a football and boxing fan probably in equal measure s Sky Sports can't go as I do watch loads of the Premiership stuff. I'm a massive British boxing fan, probably over and above the international stuff, I know that might not make sense to some but I was brought up on Friday Fight Night so I love the whole leisure centre/small hall scene and loved that Sky supported it back then. I was kind of hoping allegedly would take up that mantle as Sky have now just moved to the big arena shows with Fast Eddie, but they haven't really done that so far.

I'll stick with BN for now and see how it goes, £12 a month or whatever isn't huge money, I'm sure we all spend that on a few beers.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23191
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury fight off

Post by mickey1975 »

TheCobra wrote:I'm a football and boxing fan probably in equal measure s Sky Sports can't go as I do watch loads of the Premiership stuff. I'm a massive British boxing fan, probably over and above the international stuff, I know that might not make sense to some but I was brought up on Friday Fight Night so I love the whole leisure centre/small hall scene and loved that Sky supported it back then. I was kind of hoping allegedly would take up that mantle as Sky have now just moved to the big arena shows with Fast Eddie, but they haven't really done that so far.

I'll stick with BN for now and see how it goes, £12 a month or whatever isn't huge money, I'm sure we all spend that on a few beers.
Frankie Gavin Friday night.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Hagler2002 »

I wish I was in the know! Then I could come on here and pretend to be forum demigod.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23191
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury fight off

Post by mickey1975 »

Hagler2002 wrote:I wish I was in the know! Then I could come on here and pretend to be forum demigod.
I'm honestly not in the know about this. But I trust the two I've said.
london
Super Middleweight
Posts: 198
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 07:16

Re: Fury fight off

Post by london »

I see there was nobody from the Fury camp or Chisoras camp at last nights fight. Ustinov got a very good reception with people queuing up for his picture etc.

No Bill Ives either.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Andrew »

Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Tuan_Jim »

If Tyson and his uncle are that close, as it appears they are, that's fair enough.

I expect Fury will now fight Chisora in September, or whenever the rescheduled date it.

As unlucky as people think Fury is, I think of him careerwise as being very lucky. I think he has dodged some serious bullets so far with Price, Pulev, Haye and now Ustinov.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32999
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Fury fight off

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Sorry to sound harsh, but I've reflected on this overnight and I'm very unimpressed by a fighter pulling out on the day of the fight because his uncle is ill. No wonder Frank was so pissed off.

If it was his wife or son I'd say it was fair enough, but an uncle? Nope, very unprofessional of Fury imo. Hopefully this will teach him not to call other fighters cowards, considering he's got a far less legitimate reason for pulling out than Haye or Chisora did.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Fury fight off

Post by tobyh5 »

If this is as advertised - a pull out due to illness of his uncle then it shows him one thing - that sometimes situations happen that make it unwise to go through with a fight (unwise in your own opinion) and so you decide to not fight. I would say an injury is a lot more of a legit reason to pull out of a fight than an uncle being ill.

To be honest, makes his whole shouting about Haye and Chisora being pussies very hollow.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Fury fight off

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

What goes around comes around.

Fury will get very little sympathy not because people don't care about his uncle but because he constantly acts like a knob.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Fury fight off

Post by brilo33 »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:What goes around comes around.

Fury will get very little sympathy not because people don't care about his uncle but because he constantly acts like a knob.
But what tyson says is not really malice ,not to sound nasty but he is a bit child like,he is trying to copy ali.He is not there with ivan drago
Locked