Andrej Dirrell
-
PsychoGamer
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 95
- Joined: 29 Jun 2012, 11:24
Andrej Dirrell
Whats up with him? He fought Abraham, then he takes a 19 months break. He fights again, but after this one, 13 months layoff. One easy fight again, and then... 18 months layoff. How does he earn his money? Why is he wasting his talent?
He lost a split decision to Froch, he could avenge his loss now & be world champion. Or he could beat Abraham again & be world champion. Or he could fight Bika to avenge his brothers draw & be world champ.
I don't think he takes it serious anymore.
He lost a split decision to Froch, he could avenge his loss now & be world champion. Or he could beat Abraham again & be world champion. Or he could fight Bika to avenge his brothers draw & be world champ.
I don't think he takes it serious anymore.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Its funny 5 years ago no one could tell his brother Anthony may be a world champ before Andre.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17233
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Put him in against Golovkin and you will never see him fight again. ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Is Andrej, Andre's Russian twin?
-
PsychoGamer
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 95
- Joined: 29 Jun 2012, 11:24
Re: Andrej Dirrell
I didn't even know him at this time. First heard from him, when he had some bike crash, and i thought Andre Dirrell would've been hit. Don't think its funny, its just sad. But maybe Bika wins this time, so Andre still has a chance.world ranked wrote:Its funny 5 years ago no one could tell his brother Anthony may be a world champ before Andre.
With all respect to Golovkin, but Dirrell would be the best he's faced yet. He has a better technique than Geale/Macklin and good power, considering he's been fighting at 168. He's not some light-middleweight like Rosado. He neither has been down plenty of times like Geale, Rosado, Macklin, or Stevens. He even beat him as an amateur.Baby Face Finster wrote:Put him in against Golovkin and you will never see him fight again.
Nah, his polish one...diddy wrote:Is Andrej, Andre's Russian twin?
Re: Andrej Dirrell
GGG hasn't fought anyone in the same stratosphere as Dirrell, who is bigger, better, faster than all of GGGs opponents by a mile. If GGG is moving 168, Dirrell is not the guy to target. And Ward. But we already knew that.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Andrei this is Russian version this namediddy wrote:Is Andrej, Andre's Russian twin?
Re: Andrej Dirrell
GGG defeated Andre in amateurs and he would definitely demolish him now. In order to get to Golovkin's business league, Dirrell needs to defeat a few opponents worth mentioning. I doubt that he is still mentally capable to face a good puncher. Bica or Butte would be good tests.diddy wrote:GGG hasn't fought anyone in the same stratosphere as Dirrell, who is bigger, better, faster than all of GGGs opponents by a mile. If GGG is moving 168, Dirrell is not the guy to target. And Ward. But we already knew that.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Did you just say amateurs?ikorolev wrote:GGG defeated Andre in amateurs and he would definitely demolish him now. In order to get to Golovkin's business league, Dirrell needs to defeat a few opponents worth mentioning. I doubt that he is still mentally capable to face a good puncher. Bica or Butte would be good tests.diddy wrote:GGG hasn't fought anyone in the same stratosphere as Dirrell, who is bigger, better, faster than all of GGGs opponents by a mile. If GGG is moving 168, Dirrell is not the guy to target. And Ward. But we already knew that.
Present an actual argument that is relevant.
Berto beat a bunch of good middles and super middles in the am's. Who cares.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
If GGG was to move up to 168 for his next fight, Andre would be his best first fight, GGG would be the betting favourate because of the inactivity that Dirrel has had. Would be great for boxing to see this one, I think Dirrell wins it convincingly though.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
In amateurs, GGG's advantage in power was not as important as in professionals. If he could outbox Dirrell in amateurs, he will destroy him now, especially taking into account Andre's background with power punchers.diddy wrote:Did you just say amateurs?ikorolev wrote:GGG defeated Andre in amateurs and he would definitely demolish him now. In order to get to Golovkin's business league, Dirrell needs to defeat a few opponents worth mentioning. I doubt that he is still mentally capable to face a good puncher. Bica or Butte would be good tests.diddy wrote:GGG hasn't fought anyone in the same stratosphere as Dirrell, who is bigger, better, faster than all of GGGs opponents by a mile. If GGG is moving 168, Dirrell is not the guy to target. And Ward. But we already knew that.
Present an actual argument that is relevant.
Berto beat a bunch of good middles and super middles in the am's. Who cares.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Tilman outboxed Tyson in amateurs.Tyson destroyed him in pro
Abdullaev and Pinto beat Cotto in amateurs.Cotto beat this guys in pro
Biggs beat Lewis in amateurs.Lewis beat Biggs in pro.
Abdullaev and Pinto beat Cotto in amateurs.Cotto beat this guys in pro
Biggs beat Lewis in amateurs.Lewis beat Biggs in pro.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
You don't get it. Tyson couldn't fully use his power in amateurs. In Golovkin's case, he has both power advantage and amateur win.Woldemar wrote:Tilman outboxed Tyson in amateurs.Tyson destroyed him in pro
Abdullaev and Pinto beat Cotto in amateurs.Cotto beat this guys in pro
Biggs beat Lewis in amateurs.Lewis beat Biggs in pro.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
I agree 100 %. Golovkin would probably never fight again if he faced Dirrell lol. Even with all the time off Dirrell resume is leaps and bounds better than GggBaby Face Finster wrote:Put him in against Golovkin and you will never see him fight again.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Andrej Dirrell
Technically Dirrell would be the best GGG has faced, but his heart is far from the best.PsychoGamer wrote:
With all respect to Golovkin, but Dirrell would be the best he's faced yet. He has a better technique than Geale/Macklin and good power, considering he's been fighting at 168.
Dirrell would be on his bike from the start against GGG.
Last edited by ttornado on 04 Aug 2014, 15:34, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
With Andre being so much better than Gennady, why couldn't come close to beating him in amateurs ? As soon as Gennady touches him, he will start running for life and pray for another DQ "win".scallum wrote:I agree 100 %. Golovkin would probably never fight again if he faced Dirrell lol. Even with all the time off Dirrell resume is leaps and bounds better than GggBaby Face Finster wrote:Put him in against Golovkin and you will never see him fight again.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Andrej Dirrell
I'm far from a Dirrell fan, but that DQ win was fair. King Arthur did hit him when he was down. Not hard enough the justify his BS since, but he was hit when down.ikorolev wrote:pray for another DQ "win".
Re: Andrej Dirrell
The DQ was fair, however you will find a lot of people not believing in his theatrical performance on the canvas.ttornado wrote:I'm far from a Dirrell fan, but that DQ win was fair. King Arthur did hit him when he was down. Not hard enough the justify his BS since, but he was hit when down.ikorolev wrote:pray for another DQ "win".
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Andrej Dirrell
He'll be having more convulsions, maybe even for real(!), if he fought GGG.ikorolev wrote:
The DQ was fair, however you will find a lot of people not believing in his theatrical performance on the canvas.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13111
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Andrej Dirrell
Dirrell would just be the latest in GGG's line of reversing performing monkeys. Andre would take one look at G and shit his pants like he did vs Froch.
Forget whether Froch beat him or not (He did). If Carl can make it close against Dirrell GGG would walk through him.
Forget whether Froch beat him or not (He did). If Carl can make it close against Dirrell GGG would walk through him.
Re: Andrej Dirrell
You do realize they went 1-1 against each other in the amateurs, right?ikorolev wrote:With Andre being so much better than Gennady, why couldn't come close to beating him in amateurs ? As soon as Gennady touches him, he will start running for life and pray for another DQ "win".scallum wrote:I agree 100 %. Golovkin would probably never fight again if he faced Dirrell lol. Even with all the time off Dirrell resume is leaps and bounds better than GggBaby Face Finster wrote:Put him in against Golovkin and you will never see him fight again.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Andrej Dirrell
He didn't he ran and ran.Riddick Blowe wrote:
Forget whether Froch beat him or not (He did).
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Andrej Dirrell
That's when elite amateurs wore headguards, right?Trunzo wrote:
You do realize they went 1-1 against each other in the amateurs, right?
Re: Andrej Dirrell
No, I don't. When did Andre win ?Trunzo wrote: You do realize they went 1-1 against each other in the amateurs, right?
Re: Andrej Dirrell
I am responding to the claims that Dirrell "couldn't come close" to him in the amateurs. I wasn't trying to say a thing about whether amateur fights mattered or not.ttornado wrote:That's when elite amateurs wore headguards, right?Trunzo wrote:
You do realize they went 1-1 against each other in the amateurs, right?