
Now, that's of course far from an ATG resume, but still, within 14 fights, that's quite a high level to be fighting at. Have you ever seen anything similiar?

IMO somebody who has massive amateur background like him (2x olympic gold, 2x world champ, 7x Cuba champ), cannot fight bums in pro´s.Kaaspeer wrote:But within these only 14 fights, he has already achieved this:
Now, that's of course far from an ATG resume, but still, within 14 fights, that's quite a high level to be fighting at. Have you ever seen anything similiar?
There is no perfect rival out there for him right now, but I would be okay with Leo Santa Cruz, Donaire rematch, Gonzalez, Mares, or Gradovich. Leo Santa Cruz really needs more time to develop, though; and Gonzalez / Mares need to offer some evidence as to whether Gonzalez - Mares was just a fluke.Kaaspeer wrote:Which opponents would you like to see him fight?
I'd throw the Inoue's in there, don't think they had 500 amateur bouts between them but their 8 combined pro fights have already been impressiveLackeos wrote:Wow, he accomplished all of that at the tender young age of 33?? Amazing! Saul Alvarez is already an ancient 24, and he's only beat Alfredo Angulo, Erislandy Lara, and Austin Trout so deep into his career on the seniors tour. I mean, aside from the 8 other decent fighters that Alvarez beat (Baldomir, Ndou, M. Hatton, Rhodes, Gomez, Cintron, Mosley, Lopez).
Vasyl Lomachenko seems on course to have a really absurd achievement vs total fights resume.
But all of this only serves to illustrate that quantity of professional fights is absolutely irrelevant as far as where a fighter is in his development. Rigondeaux is the perfect example of a fighter whom you can say "He's only been in 14 boxing matches," and be extremely wrong since he's been in 500 boxing matches.
There was a real reason why Mares didn't go for the rematch right away, they want to see some slippage in Gonzalez before they test those waters again. No way was that fight a fluke, I've read the sparring reports on them and everyone knows that Gonzalez was owning him then just as he owned him in their fight. This is one of the major reasons why I hate when people downgrade sparring as though it tells no tales, as far as Rigo goes then I'd say he is still in the process of proving himself and he did have a late start as a Pro but he is still impressive.Lackeos wrote:Wow, he accomplished all of that at the tender young age of 33?? Amazing! Saul Alvarez is already an ancient 24, and he's only beat Alfredo Angulo, Erislandy Lara, and Austin Trout so deep into his career on the seniors tour. I mean, aside from the 8 other decent fighters that Alvarez beat (Baldomir, Ndou, M. Hatton, Rhodes, Gomez, Cintron, Mosley, Lopez).
Vasyl Lomachenko seems on course to have a really absurd achievement vs total fights resume.
But all of this only serves to illustrate that quantity of professional fights is absolutely irrelevant as far as where a fighter is in his development. Rigondeaux is the perfect example of a fighter whom you can say "He's only been in 14 boxing matches," and be extremely wrong since he's been in 500 boxing matches.
There is no perfect rival out there for him right now, but I would be okay with Leo Santa Cruz, Donaire rematch, Gonzalez, Mares, or Gradovich. Leo Santa Cruz really needs more time to develop, though; and Gonzalez / Mares need to offer some evidence as to whether Gonzalez - Mares was just a fluke.Kaaspeer wrote:Which opponents would you like to see him fight?
Agree. Nonito gains lil rematching Guillermo cuz idk that it goes much different.verballistic wrote: I really doubt Nonito would take a rematch...it would derail his rebuilding program.
Rigondeaux 374-12Boxing Prospect wrote:I'd throw the Inoue's in there, don't think they had 500 amateur bouts between them but their 8 combined pro fights have already been impressiveLackeos wrote:Wow, he accomplished all of that at the tender young age of 33?? Amazing! Saul Alvarez is already an ancient 24, and he's only beat Alfredo Angulo, Erislandy Lara, and Austin Trout so deep into his career on the seniors tour. I mean, aside from the 8 other decent fighters that Alvarez beat (Baldomir, Ndou, M. Hatton, Rhodes, Gomez, Cintron, Mosley, Lopez).
Vasyl Lomachenko seems on course to have a really absurd achievement vs total fights resume.
But all of this only serves to illustrate that quantity of professional fights is absolutely irrelevant as far as where a fighter is in his development. Rigondeaux is the perfect example of a fighter whom you can say "He's only been in 14 boxing matches," and be extremely wrong since he's been in 500 boxing matches.
The Lomachenko amateur record of 396-1 is fake. He didn't have that many fights and he has at least 2 losses.tiny_acres wrote:Rigondeaux 374-12Boxing Prospect wrote:I'd throw the Inoue's in there, don't think they had 500 amateur bouts between them but their 8 combined pro fights have already been impressiveLackeos wrote:Wow, he accomplished all of that at the tender young age of 33?? Amazing! Saul Alvarez is already an ancient 24, and he's only beat Alfredo Angulo, Erislandy Lara, and Austin Trout so deep into his career on the seniors tour. I mean, aside from the 8 other decent fighters that Alvarez beat (Baldomir, Ndou, M. Hatton, Rhodes, Gomez, Cintron, Mosley, Lopez).
Vasyl Lomachenko seems on course to have a really absurd achievement vs total fights resume.
But all of this only serves to illustrate that quantity of professional fights is absolutely irrelevant as far as where a fighter is in his development. Rigondeaux is the perfect example of a fighter whom you can say "He's only been in 14 boxing matches," and be extremely wrong since he's been in 500 boxing matches.
Lomenchenko 396-1