British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Yeah I'd go for that, I used to take it personally but it's just an interest and a pastime, it's not worth getting wound up over and horse does interact and give his reasons.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32997
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
I'm not sure Horse actively tries to wind everyone up, he just seems to be one of those people who can only view boxing in terms of stats.mickey1975 wrote:Why don't we boycott the monthly p4p thread? He is one poster who clearly enjoys winding people up. There are infinitely more knowledgeable people on this forum who don't feel the need to put up a list.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Yes We Can wrote:because it actually gets people talking & posting?mickey1975 wrote:Why don't we boycott the monthly p4p thread? He is one poster who clearly enjoys winding people up. There are infinitely more knowledgeable people on this forum who don't feel the need to put up a list.
Horse gets a lot of stick, but he's a good guy who's willing to throw his opinions out there for all to agree with or laugh at. People hammer him far to much for little things on these, he has his reasons for his rankings rightly or wrongly.... its his list not gospel.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
He is good but humourless
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
There's a time for humour and a time for being serious.palooka wrote:He is good but humourless
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
To everything, turn, turn, turn, there is a season, turn, turn, turnHorse wrote:There's a time for humour and a time for being serious.palooka wrote:He is good but humourless
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Nah p4p are fun but I think what we should do instead is everyone submit their rankings and have a discussion about it rather than just one poster putting up rankings.mickey1975 wrote:Why don't we boycott the monthly p4p thread? He is one poster who clearly enjoys winding people up. There are infinitely more knowledgeable people on this forum who don't feel the need to put up a list.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Not sure whats happened hereHorse wrote:1. (1.) Carl Froch
2. (2.) Amir Khan
3. (3.) Martin Murray
4. (4.) Carl Frampton
5. (5.) George Groves
6. (6.) Tyson Fury
7. (7.) Ola Afolabi
8. (8.) James DeGale
9. (9.) Kell Brook
10. (10.) Dereck Chisora
It would appear some Z-list celebrity, attention seeking, money grabbing, sell out, reality TV "star" has found his way to the top of a boxing list.
There must be some mistake
Why isn't David Haye on your list, he used to be good at punching people too!
-
Parson Cross
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Why don't we have a poster top 30 list ?
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Top 20 instead? From 20-30 would be a pain to do.Parson Cross wrote:Why don't we have a poster top 30 list ?
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Key words USE TO BEdavie wrote:Not sure whats happened hereHorse wrote:1. (1.) Carl Froch
2. (2.) Amir Khan
3. (3.) Martin Murray
4. (4.) Carl Frampton
5. (5.) George Groves
6. (6.) Tyson Fury
7. (7.) Ola Afolabi
8. (8.) James DeGale
9. (9.) Kell Brook
10. (10.) Dereck Chisora
It would appear some Z-list celebrity, attention seeking, money grabbing, sell out, reality TV "star" has found his way to the top of a boxing list.
There must be some mistake
Why isn't David Haye on your list, he used to be good at punching people too!
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
I like these threads. I don't think the top 15 is far out but it gets very hard when you go below that.
I still have a problem with Murray though. I'm a fan and think he was unlucky not to become champ twice.
But he's been dreadful since then. So that has to be considered despite the fact he won, in huge same way that his decent performances should be considered despite not winning.
Somewhere around 8-10 seems fair.
I still have a problem with Murray though. I'm a fan and think he was unlucky not to become champ twice.
But he's been dreadful since then. So that has to be considered despite the fact he won, in huge same way that his decent performances should be considered despite not winning.
Somewhere around 8-10 seems fair.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32997
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Reason and logic don't sway Horse when it comes to Murray.garethhop wrote:I like these threads. I don't think the top 15 is far out but it gets very hard when you go below that.
I still have a problem with Murray though. I'm a fan and think he was unlucky not to become champ twice.
But he's been dreadful since then. So that has to be considered despite the fact he won, in huge same way that his decent performances should be considered despite not winning.
Somewhere around 8-10 seems fair.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
My opinion on Murray's ranking is logical and reasonable.Boxerbeetle123 wrote:Reason and logic don't sway Horse when it comes to Murray.garethhop wrote:I like these threads. I don't think the top 15 is far out but it gets very hard when you go below that.
I still have a problem with Murray though. I'm a fan and think he was unlucky not to become champ twice.
But he's been dreadful since then. So that has to be considered despite the fact he won, in huge same way that his decent performances should be considered despite not winning.
Somewhere around 8-10 seems fair.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Horse wrote:My opinion on Murray's ranking is logical and reasonable.
Re: British Top 30 P4P August 2014
Man crushHorse wrote:My opinion on Murray's ranking is logical and reasonable.Boxerbeetle123 wrote:Reason and logic don't sway Horse when it comes to Murray.garethhop wrote:I like these threads. I don't think the top 15 is far out but it gets very hard when you go below that.
I still have a problem with Murray though. I'm a fan and think he was unlucky not to become champ twice.
But he's been dreadful since then. So that has to be considered despite the fact he won, in huge same way that his decent performances should be considered despite not winning.
Somewhere around 8-10 seems fair.