Froch Groves rematch finances

Post Reply
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by JimJim2009 »

Some eye-watering figures have come out.

900,000 PPV sales = just over 15 million quid
77,000 tickets sold = 6 million quid
overseas TV rights = half a million quid
sponsorship and merchandising = half a million quid

The total revenues created are just over twenty two million quid

And here is where it went

Froch = eight million quid
Groves = two million quid
Sky TV = 7.5 million quid
Wembley fee = half a million quid
Undercard = half a million quid
Misc costs = 3.8 million quid

Impressive numbers !
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by tobyh5 »

Where is the Matchroom profit?
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by JimJim2009 »

tobyh5 wrote:Where is the Matchroom profit?
Eddie is Carl's manager and promoter so there is a big slice right there.
I imagine Sky paid Matchroom out of their cut too.
Misc costs come to almost four million quid, that would include overheads.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by leforge »

JimJim2009 wrote:Some eye-watering figures have come out.

900,000 PPV sales = just over 15 million quid
77,000 tickets sold = 6 million quid
overseas TV rights = half a million quid
sponsorship and merchandising = half a million quid

The total revenues created are just over twenty two million quid

And here is where it went

Froch = eight million quid
Groves = two million quid
Sky TV = 7.5 million quid
Wembley fee = half a million quid
Undercard = half a million quid
Misc costs = 3.8 million quid

Impressive numbers !
This was in mail most of it guess work.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1956
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by liamlion »

A (likely speculative) breakdown of the figures:

http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/sport/story/330143.html
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by JimJim2009 »

liamlion wrote:A (likely speculative) breakdown of the figures:

http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/sport/story/330143.html
Looks like its based on the Daily Mail article that I got the figures from. Eddie writes a weekly column for the Mail, so I'd be surprised if the journalist has completely made up these figures. If the real figures are anything like the ones mentioned here, its just astonishing really.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23189
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by mickey1975 »

JimJim2009 wrote:
liamlion wrote:A (likely speculative) breakdown of the figures:

http://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/sport/story/330143.html
Looks like its based on the Daily Mail article that I got the figures from. Eddie writes a weekly column for the Mail, so I'd be surprised if the journalist has completely made up these figures. If the real figures are anything like the ones mentioned here, its just astonishing really.
I'm not surprised. Wembley stadium was almost full and nearly all my pals were watching it on SBO.
BAP1
Middleweight
Posts: 162
Joined: 10 Nov 2013, 06:05

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by BAP1 »

Heard From a good source that Eddie pocketed triple the amount that Groves made
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8649
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by coneye »

BAP1 wrote:Heard From a good source that Eddie pocketed triple the amount that Groves made
He would off Forked out 10 times more has well .. But its good they all made a good quid , more chance of bigger events happenning in the future
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by whiskey »

Groves was offered 25%, turned it down - and then the IBF ruling saw him get just 15%

#Everythingforareason
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by sweetscience »

G0mez wrote:Groves was offered 25%, turned it down - and then the IBF ruling saw him get just 15%

#Everythingforareason
yes but that would have only happened in a purse bids situation ???

I think they did a deal
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23189
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by mickey1975 »

sweetscience wrote:
G0mez wrote:Groves was offered 25%, turned it down - and then the IBF ruling saw him get just 15%

#Everythingforareason
yes but that would have only happened in a purse bids situation ???

I think they did a deal
If the figures on the purses are accurate, he got 20%.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Parson Cross »

Forget about the percentages argument.
George received an offer he couldn't refuse ..... and it wasn't from the Godfather.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Parson Cross »

Don't you just love it when "misc costs" are the third highest. Ha !
Wake up call
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Wake up call »

If those figures are correct, which I'm sure they're not, then the show made a 300k loss.

Income: £22m

Expenditure: £22.3m
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Loynesy »

Wake up call wrote:If those figures are correct, which I'm sure they're not, then the show made a 300k loss.

Income: £22m

Expenditure: £22.3m

WUP - basic accounting: they have to balance. One is wrong.

Im far closer to the Vegas fight scene than UK these days, but im led to believe Hearn (E) made an appropriate amount to justify his investment.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Parson Cross »

:TU:
Everybody did ok.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by jonny »

So would Howard Fosters fee come out of the Misc costs :TU:
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by jonny »

Viktor Vaughn wrote:
jonny wrote:So would Howard Fosters fee come out of the Misc costs :TU:
Comedy's all about timing. The thread title contains the word "rematch".
And he caused the rematch :doh:
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Sklar »

Loynesy wrote:
Wake up call wrote:If those figures are correct, which I'm sure they're not, then the show made a 300k loss.

Income: £22m

Expenditure: £22.3m

WUP - basic accounting: they have to balance. One is wrong.

Im far closer to the Vegas fight scene than UK these days, but im led to believe Hearn (E) made an appropriate amount to justify his investment.
What do you mean by WUP in this context? Wind up petition?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by Counter-puncher »

abbreviation for WakeUP?
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Froch Groves rematch finances

Post by ILikeBeer »

Parson Cross wrote:Don't you just love it when "misc costs" are the third highest. Ha !
Uncle Eddie hired a limo to get there and back.
Post Reply