Julian Jackson v. Michael Watson

[Woldemar]

Who takes it?

[Clint Magnum]

Watson for me. UD.

[jay123]

Julian Jackson, give him a clean punch and fight will over.

Watson is a good fight for him, but I think the Hawk will break him down in 7-9 round.
To beat the Hawk, u got to have the guy like Gerald M who hit at the comparable power but bigger and stronger than Julion.

[Crease]

I'd give it to Jackson.

[Woldemar]

Jackson KO in midrounds for me .

[Bard of Boxrec]

Jackson, brutally.

[misterpunch]

its very easy to give a quick ko victory to JJ but I see Watson proving difficult to hit and being smart enough to get earn a close decision

he was very good was Michael against this kind of bomber

[palooka]

Jackson was a far cleaner hitter than Benn. I think Watson wouldn't have taken any flush shots early but would have been caught clean late on when Julian was far in front on the cards.

[Bricks]

Jackson had more power than Benn but not as much speed or output.....either way it's moot Watson was very good defensively apart from the abberation v McCallum when he led and fought foolishly.Watson pts

[SamWise72]

Jackson can stop pretty much anyone who he hits clean. What he's not going to do is wear Watson, who was always super fit and too elusive to take punishment against Jackson the way he did against McCallum. If Jackson is gonna win, it'll be in the first 5.