Serious question to UK fanboys
Serious question to UK fanboys
If Brook were American and the challenger, and Porter British, and the fight held in the UK, would the champ have lost his belt on home soil?
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Who knows.
Fact is that Brook deserved to win that fight.
Fact is that Brook deserved to win that fight.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
diddy wrote:If Brook were American and the challenger, and Porter British, and the fight held in the UK, would the champ have lost his belt on home soil?
I think what is important in ALL fights is that the correct man gets the verdict. Tonight Porter swung everything but all the clean landing and quality came from Brook. The right man won.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13518
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Question for you.
If my Auntie had bollocks. Would she be my Uncle?
If my Auntie had bollocks. Would she be my Uncle?
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Anyone who pretends for a second that the OP isn't dead on accurate here is kidding themselves.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
How can you claim the thread is "serious" and use the word "fanboys" in the same goddamn title?
I'm not British, but I thought Porter won that for what it's worth. I thought he was dominant through the first 7 1/2 rounds or so. He certainly faded late, but fights are not scored on momentum. He just won too many rounds to lose it to me.
I'm not British, but I thought Porter won that for what it's worth. I thought he was dominant through the first 7 1/2 rounds or so. He certainly faded late, but fights are not scored on momentum. He just won too many rounds to lose it to me.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
If that fight was in Texas with Texas judges would Kell have got the nod?
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
I don't see how Brook didn't win that, though I think a close score is justifiable. To me there was too big of a gap in clean punching for Porter to have an argument.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
The British judge had it a draw!diddy wrote:If Brook were American and the challenger, and Porter British, and the fight held in the UK, would the champ have lost his belt on home soil?
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Precisely. From 4/5 Brook landed the cleaner better shots. Porter just threw more meaningless shots.crusader wrote:I don't see how Brook didn't win that, though I think a close score is justifiable. To me there was too big of a gap in clean punching for Porter to have an argument.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Fans. Fanboys. Whatever. It was a close fight. Traveling challengers are never ever ever taking straps off British champs in the UK. NEVER. EVER. Unless it's a total wipeout like Crawford - Burns.Bobbyptsd wrote:How can you claim the thread is "serious" and use the word "fanboys" in the same goddamn title?
I'm not British, but I thought Porter won that for what it's worth. I thought he was dominant through the first 7 1/2 rounds or so. He certainly faded late, but fights are not scored on momentum. He just won too many rounds to lose it to me.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
If Lennox Lewis had been 7 inches shorter and a southpaw, but also been a welterweight with a speech impediment and a love for Pottery, would Annie Lennox still have had a sucessful solo career?jameswilson wrote:Question for you.
If my Auntie had bollocks. Would she be my Uncle?
Yeah, this thread is kind of ridiculous. I thought Porter won, but I see no point in going through all the "yeah but...." scenarios just so everyone can wave flags and yell at each other.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
I'm British, and had Porter up by two rounds, mainly because of the early rounds,
But all the better work was done by Kell. Porters style is aggressive, but does it achieve much? Running up and putting the head in, time and again....
Ref was a joke too.
You win some, you lose some. That's boxing decisions. But any suggestion this was a robbery is a joke.
But all the better work was done by Kell. Porters style is aggressive, but does it achieve much? Running up and putting the head in, time and again....
Ref was a joke too.
You win some, you lose some. That's boxing decisions. But any suggestion this was a robbery is a joke.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
It's not whatever. It's an insult. I don't see how you can insult people from the get go, and pretend to want to have a serious conversation.diddy wrote:Fans. Fanboys. Whatever. It was a close fight. Traveling challengers are never ever ever taking straps off British champs in the UK. NEVER. EVER. Unless it's a total wipeout like Crawford - Burns.Bobbyptsd wrote:How can you claim the thread is "serious" and use the word "fanboys" in the same goddamn title?
I'm not British, but I thought Porter won that for what it's worth. I thought he was dominant through the first 7 1/2 rounds or so. He certainly faded late, but fights are not scored on momentum. He just won too many rounds to lose it to me.
Crap like this is why I never come here anymore.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
I'm not a UK fanboy by any means, I'm from the US. But the fact is, Brook deserved the win and rightfully got it. It was a close fight, I wouldn't have been surprised or yelled robbery even if Porter got the nod. What I saw was Porter lunging in and throwing a lot of useless arm punches on the inside that was having no effect what so ever (but he was pressing the action a lot of the fight), while Brook was landing clean effective shots from the outside (a lot of nice counters and even landed some nice leads).
I don't agree with the 117-111 card, I had it closer than that. Wasn't the best fight to watch, but it was a meaningful fight and thankfully the right guy won. I just don't understand why these judges can't get fights right. A fornicating disgrace what some of these judges come up with on their scorecards.
I don't agree with the 117-111 card, I had it closer than that. Wasn't the best fight to watch, but it was a meaningful fight and thankfully the right guy won. I just don't understand why these judges can't get fights right. A fornicating disgrace what some of these judges come up with on their scorecards.
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Neverdiddy wrote: Fans. Fanboys. Whatever. It was a close fight. Traveling challengers are never ever ever taking straps off British champs in the UK. NEVER. EVER.
Ever
Bundu
Gavin
!
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
It's no worse in the UK than it is in the US.
The right man won here, but of course someone will find something to complain about, in this case a hypothetical injustice.
The right man won here, but of course someone will find something to complain about, in this case a hypothetical injustice.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
The very worse kind!crusader wrote:It's no worse in the UK than it is in the US.
The right man won here, but of course someone will find something to complain about, in this case a hypothetical injustice.
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
This.Ian1973 wrote:diddy wrote:If Brook were American and the challenger, and Porter British, and the fight held in the UK, would the champ have lost his belt on home soil?
I think what is important in ALL fights is that the correct man gets the verdict.
But if you really bet $1,500 on this fight & I was in your shoes I might be doing some hypothetical conspiracy theory sh!t too right now.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Kell won what was an awful, awful fight
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Since when is "fanboy" an insult? Not like I called them A$$hole or F*ckhead.Bobbyptsd wrote:It's not whatever. It's an insult. I don't see how you can insult people from the get go, and pretend to want to have a serious conversation.diddy wrote:Fans. Fanboys. Whatever. It was a close fight. Traveling challengers are never ever ever taking straps off British champs in the UK. NEVER. EVER. Unless it's a total wipeout like Crawford - Burns.Bobbyptsd wrote:How can you claim the thread is "serious" and use the word "fanboys" in the same goddamn title?
I'm not British, but I thought Porter won that for what it's worth. I thought he was dominant through the first 7 1/2 rounds or so. He certainly faded late, but fights are not scored on momentum. He just won too many rounds to lose it to me.
Crap like this is why I never come here anymore.
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Gavin was a champ? If he was it was a 5th rate garbage strap that carries no $ with it. I'm talking real champs.ttornado wrote:Neverdiddy wrote: Fans. Fanboys. Whatever. It was a close fight. Traveling challengers are never ever ever taking straps off British champs in the UK. NEVER. EVER.
Ever
Bundu
Gavin
!
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
Commonwealth champ, it meant so much that Bundu didn't realise he was fighting for itdiddy wrote: Gavin was a champ? If he was it was a 5th rate garbage strap that carries no $ with it. I'm talking real champs.
But principle stands
Re: Serious question to UK fanboys
No principle doesnt stand. There is no $ behind that belt. I am talking recognized world belts that bring cash flow.ttornado wrote:Commonwealth champ, it meant so much that Bundu didn't realise he was fighting for itdiddy wrote: Gavin was a champ? If he was it was a 5th rate garbage strap that carries no $ with it. I'm talking real champs.
But principle stands