Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ttornado »

The fight we all wanted Lomachenko vs #47!
http://www.BS.com/lomachenko-p ... eri--81271
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ReggieDiggs »

The guy is a champ after 3 fights. If he fights a bs guy or two while defending & gaining pro experience I don't see a problem.
TheBeast
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5244
Joined: 23 Jul 2009, 02:06

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by TheBeast »

Chonlatarn is actually not a bad fighter... but yes he will get destroyed and everyone will say he is crap.

He fought last friday and didn't look too good
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by crusader »

fergusg wrote:This might sound rather bizarre, but taking such a step down in quality when you've literally been thrown into the deep end, may actually be a counter-productive move for Lomachenko.

Opponents of this calibre cannot possibly enhance his career and experience in any way... in fact, this could cause severe motivational issues! :-?
With such a tiny number of traditional pro fights and issues with not being consistently active enough in bouts, I'm not sure that Loma isn't going to benefit from opponents like this right now.

Piriyapinyo is also his mandatory.
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ReggieDiggs »

crusader wrote:
fergusg wrote:This might sound rather bizarre, but taking such a step down in quality when you've literally been thrown into the deep end, may actually be a counter-productive move for Lomachenko.

Opponents of this calibre cannot possibly enhance his career and experience in any way... in fact, this could cause severe motivational issues! :-?
With such a tiny number of traditional pro fights and issues with not being consistently active enough in bouts, I'm not sure that Loma isn't going to benefit from opponents like this right now.
Agree completely.
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ttornado »

crusader wrote:
With such a tiny number of traditional pro fights and issues with not being consistently active enough in bouts, I'm not sure that Loma isn't going to benefit from opponents like this right now.

Piriyapinyo is also his mandatory.
Boxers should be active and should fight their mandatories without delay.
Lomachenko is acting like a champion should.
scallum
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by scallum »

ttornado wrote:The fight we all wanted Lomachenko vs #47!
http://www.BS.com/lomachenko-p ... eri--81271
Nobody in the history of the sport has taken on such comp in thier first 2 fights
Emil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 709
Joined: 30 Oct 2008, 08:03

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Emil »

Great. Makes the card better. Too bad I'll have left China by then.
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Deadendgeneration »

Emil wrote:Great. Makes the card better. Too bad I'll have left China by then.
Where are you at the moment? I'll be at this card.
Emil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 709
Joined: 30 Oct 2008, 08:03

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Emil »

Deadendgeneration wrote:
Emil wrote:Great. Makes the card better. Too bad I'll have left China by then.
Where are you at the moment? I'll be at this card.
Shanghai. Lucky you:)
Jpreisser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 24 Jun 2010, 14:53

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Jpreisser »

Just watched parts of a few of Piriyapinyo's fights. He doesn't have much chance here.
ponch
Cruiserweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 09:39

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ponch »

fergusg wrote:This might sound rather bizarre, but taking such a step down in quality when you've literally been thrown into the deep end, may actually be a counter-productive move for Lomachenko.
They literally threw him into a swimming pool?
ponch
Cruiserweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 09:39

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ponch »

fergusg wrote:
ponch wrote:
fergusg wrote:This might sound rather bizarre, but taking such a step down in quality when you've literally been thrown into the deep end, may actually be a counter-productive move for Lomachenko.
They literally threw him into a swimming pool?
Hilarious! :neutral: [must try harder]
Thanks, I try

I should probably just accpet that the word 'literally' no longer means literally
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1645
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by victor-romeo »

I think i read that Donaire is on this card also, maybe Arum/TR wants to showcase both guys side by side for a future matchup?
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ikorolev »

There is LITERALLY "Off Topic" forum for discussions like that. Why don't you call yourselves names and stop.
ponch
Cruiserweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 09:39

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ponch »

fergusg wrote:
ponch wrote:I should probably just accpet that the word 'literally' no longer means literally
Many people use the word "literally" for emphasis in precisely the non-literal sense and this type of use has even been added to the Oxford English Dictionary. :TU:
I'm aware :TU:
fergusg wrote:
ikorolev wrote:There is LITERALLY "Off Topic" forum for discussions like that. Why don't you call yourselves names and stop.
Stop pretending to be a forum moderator. It was a one-off comment. :salut:
I agree
ponch
Cruiserweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 09:39

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ponch »

ikorolev wrote:There is LITERALLY "Off Topic" forum for discussions like that. Why don't you call yourselves names and stop.
Name calling is kinda off topic too, although that should really be limited to Pac / Floyd threads..
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ReggieDiggs »

I figuratively don't give a f#ck. Oh wait.
ponch
Cruiserweight
Posts: 64
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 09:39

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by ponch »

Never heard of Piriyapino so no idea if his winning record is worth anything at all, but if you have a title I think it's fair that you are held to a certain standard. Loma is obviously entitled to a stay-busy fight, hope Piriyapino can take him sound rounds.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Find it funny that small site AsianBoxing.info broke this before boxing scene. They have also said that Zou Shiming will be fighting Kwanpichit OnesongchaiGym on the same card.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Lackeos »

Considering that Vasyl only managed a MD against Gary Russell Jr., I think they've appropriately downgraded his opposition to help get him a clear victory in his next fight. It's one thing to figuratively throw a fighter into the deep end; but if he has to go life-and-death in every fight and never get any confidence under him or get to physically recover, then his career outlook his going to be short and not very sweet.

Also, Piriyapinyo challenged for Chris John's title. Hard to argue that he's good enough for 47-0-2 Chris John, but not good enough for 2-1 Vasyl Lomachenko.
KSTAT124
Editor
Editor
Posts: 513
Joined: 08 Dec 2005, 22:48

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by KSTAT124 »

scallum wrote:
ttornado wrote:The fight we all wanted Lomachenko vs #47!
http://www.BS.com/lomachenko-p ... eri--81271
Nobody in the history of the sport has taken on such comp in thier first 2 fights
1956 Olympic gold medalist Pete Rademacher challenged for the world heavyweight title in his professional debut. After losing to Floyd Patterson (KO 6), Rademacher took on #2 ranked heavyweight contender Zora Folley in his second pro bout. Folley KOed him in the fourth round.

Rademacher fought until 1962, compiling a 15-7-1 record. Among those he beat were Lamar Clark, George Chuvalo, Willi Besmanoff, and Carl "Bobo" Olson. Others to whom he lost were Brian London, Doug Jones, George Logan, Archie Moore, and Karl Mildenberger.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Find it funny that small site AsianBoxing.info broke this before boxing scene. They have also said that Zou Shiming will be fighting Kwanpichit OnesongchaiGym on the same card.
...and now Zou's opponent has been confirmed as Kwanpichit. That is pretty damned impressive from the lil guys.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15778
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by giacomino »

Lackeos wrote:Considering that Vasyl only managed a MD against Gary Russell Jr., I think they've appropriately downgraded his opposition to help get him a clear victory in his next fight. It's one thing to figuratively throw a fighter into the deep end; but if he has to go life-and-death in every fight and never get any confidence under him or get to physically recover, then his career outlook his going to be short and not very sweet.

Also, Piriyapinyo challenged for Chris John's title. Hard to argue that he's good enough for 47-0-2 Chris John, but not good enough for 2-1 Vasyl Lomachenko.
Piriyapinyo will give Lomanchenko some rounds, but to be fair, most of 47-0-2 Chris John's opposition was not good enough for Lomanchenko. John defended against a high percentage of lame opponents
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Lomachenko vs Piriyapinyo Nov 22

Post by Boxing Prospect »

In fairness to John he gets a lot of hate for fighting guys western fans dont know he, a lot of those guys were OPBF champions.

Guys like Enoki and Sato were solid contender types, wins over JMM, Saucedo, Yordan and even a shot Gainer weren't awful. Also Hosono wasn't too shabby either. Sure he padded out those defences though it's not like he feasted on total no hopers.
Post Reply