Will we ever see

Post Reply
Michael bennt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Will we ever see

Post by Michael bennt »

A fighter who takes boxing up in his late 20s early 30s has very little amateur background but goes on to win a world title in the pro ranks?
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Will we ever see

Post by Badhusker »

Michael bennt wrote:A fighter who takes boxing up in his late 20s early 30s has very little amateur background but goes on to win a world title in the pro ranks?
yes
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1949
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Will we ever see

Post by The Law »

Adonis Stevenson had a relatively short but successful amateur background (33-5) and turned pro when he was 29 years old.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Will we ever see

Post by sucracristo »

jccII turned pro at 23 with only 2 amateur exhibitions.
hopkins got out of jail and turned pro at 23 i think with no amateur experience.
mundine i think converted from rugby or soccer at like 25 with no amateur background.
dwight muhamad qawi got out of jail at like 25 and turned pro with no amateurs.
i'm not sure who is the best to turn pro with no amateur background starting late.
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Will we ever see

Post by ReggieDiggs »

The Law wrote:Adonis Stevenson had a relatively short but successful amateur background (33-5) and turned pro when he was 29 years old.
Sounds like this is the mfer you're looking for.

I believe Bonecrusher Smith turned pro late into his 20s & held a hw belt for a minute. Not sure if his amateur pedigree but I don't think it was substantial w/e the case.
sucracristo
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1828
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47

Re: Will we ever see

Post by sucracristo »

ReggieDiggs wrote:
The Law wrote:Adonis Stevenson had a relatively short but successful amateur background (33-5) and turned pro when he was 29 years old.
Sounds like this is the mfer you're looking for.

I believe Bonecrusher Smith turned pro late into his 20s & held a hw belt for a minute. Not sure if his amateur pedigree but I don't think it was substantial w/e the case.

but 38 amateur fights is actually a lot for the bigger fighters.
foreman, holmes, wilder and lots of pro heavy champs had less amateur experience than that,
but got their start in their early 20's.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Will we ever see

Post by black panther »

Nate Campbell turned pro aged 28 with little amateur experience and went to to become the linear lightweight champion.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Will we ever see

Post by man »

wilder.
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Will we ever see

Post by ReggieDiggs »

man wrote:wilder.
Think Deontay turned pro @ 23 give or take a year. He didn't have much experience though.
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Will we ever see

Post by ReggieDiggs »

sucracristo wrote:
ReggieDiggs wrote:
The Law wrote:Adonis Stevenson had a relatively short but successful amateur background (33-5) and turned pro when he was 29 years old.
Sounds like this is the mfer you're looking for.

I believe Bonecrusher Smith turned pro late into his 20s & held a hw belt for a minute. Not sure if his amateur pedigree but I don't think it was substantial w/e the case.

but 38 amateur fights is actually a lot for the bigger fighters.
foreman, holmes, wilder and lots of pro heavy champs had less amateur experience than that,
but got their start in their early 20's.
Yea I guess 38 fight is a pretty solid number for amateur experience regardless of the division tbqh.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Will we ever see

Post by crusader »

fergusg wrote:
man wrote:wilder.
Surely Deontay Wilder doesn’t count, does he? He doesn’t match the criteria defined in the first post in this thread. :-? :??

His amateur record was 29-5 and also won the National Golden Gloves and US Championships, as well as being an Olympic Bronze medallist, before turning professional only three weeks after his 23rd birthday. :TU:
What's your source on his amateur record? I know of only four losses (Zimnoch, Romanov, Acosta, and Russo) and believe that he closer to 40 wins.
He didn't have much experience though.
Wilder hadn't boxed for long prior to turning pro but he fought very good opponents in the amateurs. I imagine that only a small proportion of pros fight such good amateur opposition.
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Will we ever see

Post by ReggieDiggs »

crusader wrote:
fergusg wrote:
man wrote:wilder.
Surely Deontay Wilder doesn’t count, does he? He doesn’t match the criteria defined in the first post in this thread. :-? :??

His amateur record was 29-5 and also won the National Golden Gloves and US Championships, as well as being an Olympic Bronze medallist, before turning professional only three weeks after his 23rd birthday. :TU:
What's your source on his amateur record? I know of only four losses (Zimnoch, Romanov, Acosta, and Russo) and believe that he closer to 40 wins.
He didn't have much experience though.
Wilder hadn't boxed for long prior to turning pro but he fought very good opponents in the amateurs. I imagine that only a small proportion of pros fight such good amateur opposition.
The amateur stuff is debatable & I would lean towards your opinion but Deontay is DQ'd from this debate based on age. Not to mention he hasn't won a belt yet.
Last edited by ReggieDiggs on 22 Aug 2014, 07:21, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply