tv coverage

Photocopier-the revenge! · Post by **Photocopier-the revenge!** » 21 Dec 2005, 14:10

i have followed chat on this and other forums for a couple of years. i have never been concerned enough to post on here but due to the current state of things i feel compelled to speak out.

are the current tv channels that show boxing being offered a good product from the promoter?

is the tv coverage up to the standard we would expect and hope for?

are we happy with the viewing times?

are we happy with the characters that present / panel these shows?

Spud · Post by **Spud** » 21 Dec 2005, 14:46

You are a pr*ck!!!

A very sad pr*ck!!!

Foggy · Post by **Foggy** » 21 Dec 2005, 14:51

pepsi wrote:You are a pr*ck!!!

A very sad pr*ck!!!

Fairly harsh

JimmyJamJerusalem · Post by **JimmyJamJerusalem** » 21 Dec 2005, 21:53

I don't know if Photocopier is trying to wind wrists up directly, but I must say I was NOT impressed at shelling out £15 odd quid for the Hatton bill!!! It was an awful undercard. I complained to Sky, and they basically told me to f**k off.

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 22 Dec 2005, 09:19

JimmyJamJerusalem wrote:I don't know if Photocopier is trying to wind wrists up directly, but I must say I was NOT impressed at shelling out £15 odd quid for the Hatton bill!!! It was an awful undercard. I complained to Sky, and they basically told me to f**k off.

You were right to feel done - next to no live boxing other then the main event and a replay from a week ago. Sky took the pi55 with that one IMO.

Its not like they are new to PPV - they have no excuses.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 22 Dec 2005, 09:27

It was a very poor bill, it must be said.

rhino222 · Post by **rhino222** » 22 Dec 2005, 15:04

pepsi wrote:You are a pr*ck!!!

A very sad pr*ck!!!

ha ha.....you need some chill pills spudly !!