next scottish challengres

JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by JamieM »

There is no guarentee of anything when it comes to politics, always what I was taught
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by lefty »

Alex Salmond is a sly old dog. Scots need to be wary of him. A good talker no doubt but would sell the scottish people down the river if it was good for him no doubt.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by lefty »

Alex Salmond is a sly old dog. Scots need to be wary of him. A good talker no doubt but would sell the scottish people down the river if it was good for him no doubt.
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

Ronnie Clark wrote:I don't need no belts I have plenty of them ;) I can still fight the champions :)

P.S belts are only for holding up ur trousers x
im sure that bronze masters belt holds yore trousers up great lol i could have guesed youd vote yes too so you can have more excuses. dont worry im sure kris hughes will beat you for scottish title aftre gettin beat from troy james. your not even the best fightre in dundee. i watched the light middlweght mike towel and he is fast and can punch. a relly exciting prospect from dundee
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by JamieM »

Most politicians are ! English ones are just as bad if not worse,
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

JamieM wrote:Ronnie vote no so you can fight for a British title, idiots , more to life than a boxing title
lol vote yes and what exactly will we get. someone else spendin my hard earned cash that doesnt have to work for it. maybe you know more on this subject but you dont know boxing and i doubt you know the ins and outs of what votin yes might do to the country. but im sure if you keep watchin braveheart it will make everything make sense :doh:
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by lefty »

JamieM wrote:Most politicians are ! English ones are just as bad if not worse,
Wont argue with that.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by expe »

Sklar wrote:
keirw wrote:If Scotland becomes independent later this month will Scotish fighters still be able to fight for the Lonsdale belt?
I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.
Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by JamieM »

Your the billy big bollocks on here mouthing off about a boxer hiding behind a user name, more
Like no bollocks, have you achieved anything in boxing a part from winning a ticket in a raffle or something? It's ok having an opinion but your on here personally insulting
someone from behind a screen! Your a troll
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by daviddee »

Haha voting Yes has nothing to do with boxing.. Do you think the BBofBC are gonna say we don't want your licence fees anymore from all Scottish boxers.. Ha more chance of David Cameron being popular in Scotland.. As for your list of fighters most would probably admit themselves that Ronnie is ahead of them and is a good boxer.. Seems to be some kind of problem here your name is boxing brain and you seem to lack brains.. Ronnie has beat everyone who has been put in front of him. And in most peoples opinion he beat Walsh and Hughes.. Ronnie would fight anyone that's fact. Your pushing Michael Roberts so I'm guessing you either are him or your his old man.. Ronnie has tried to get that fight for years had always been refused.. I have seen everyone of Ronnie's pro fights and been at them all live.. The ones you have seen both came to survive and hold on against Ronnie.. He won both confortably. My advice to you is change your name on here you look a tad silly
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Sklar »

expe wrote:
Sklar wrote:
keirw wrote:If Scotland becomes independent later this month will Scotish fighters still be able to fight for the Lonsdale belt?
I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.
Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.
That's up for debate. As I understand it the current legal position is that in the event of a 'yes' vote, Scots will be able to maintain dual nationality, as will the unborn children of all Scots alive at the time of the vote. The children of those children will not be British, however, as dual nationality may only be passed down one generation.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by lefty »

Sklar wrote:
expe wrote:
Sklar wrote:
I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.
Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.
That's up for debate. As I understand it the current legal position is that in the event of a 'yes' vote, Scots will be able to maintain dual nationality, as will the unborn children of all Scots alive at the time of the vote. The children of those children will not be British, however, as dual nationality may only be passed down one generation.
That seems like having your cake and eating it to me.
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

daviddee wrote:Haha voting Yes has nothing to do with boxing.. Do you think the BBofBC are gonna say we don't want your licence fees anymore from all Scottish boxers.. Ha more chance of David Cameron being popular in Scotland.. As for your list of fighters most would probably admit themselves that Ronnie is ahead of them and is a good boxer.. Seems to be some kind of problem here your name is boxing brain and you seem to lack brains.. Ronnie has beat everyone who has been put in front of him. And in most peoples opinion he beat Walsh and Hughes.. Ronnie would fight anyone that's fact. Your pushing Michael Roberts so I'm guessing you either are him or your his old man.. Ronnie has tried to get that fight for years had always been refused.. I have seen everyone of Ronnie's pro fights and been at them all live.. The ones you have seen both came to survive and hold on against Ronnie.. He won both confortably. My advice to you is change your name on here you look a tad silly
i aint michael or michael snr lol i would love that match up though because michaels boxing skillz would make ronnie look silly. maybe they can fight when ronnie has somethin worth fightin for because he brings nothin to the table. so you are tellin me that only the fights ive seen are the ones he looked bad :doh: what woulkd be the odds on that but the ones i havent seen he is a slick amazin boxer lol you are unreal
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by daviddee »

Boxing Brains wrote:i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
He would beat everyone you have mentioned.. Some aren't even at his weight. You don't have a clue. You have your own agenda which is fair enough but your coming over like a silly troll
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by daviddee »

Boxing Brains wrote:
daviddee wrote:Haha voting Yes has nothing to do with boxing.. Do you think the BBofBC are gonna say we don't want your licence fees anymore from all Scottish boxers.. Ha more chance of David Cameron being popular in Scotland.. As for your list of fighters most would probably admit themselves that Ronnie is ahead of them and is a good boxer.. Seems to be some kind of problem here your name is boxing brain and you seem to lack brains.. Ronnie has beat everyone who has been put in front of him. And in most peoples opinion he beat Walsh and Hughes.. Ronnie would fight anyone that's fact. Your pushing Michael Roberts so I'm guessing you either are him or your his old man.. Ronnie has tried to get that fight for years had always been refused.. I have seen everyone of Ronnie's pro fights and been at them all live.. The ones you have seen both came to survive and hold on against Ronnie.. He won both confortably. My advice to you is change your name on here you look a tad silly
i aint michael or michael snr lol i would love that match up though because michaels boxing skillz would make ronnie look silly. maybe they can fight when ronnie has somethin worth fightin for because he brings nothin to the table. so you are tellin me that only the fights ive seen are the ones he looked bad :doh: what woulkd be the odds on that but the ones i havent seen he is a slick amazin boxer lol you are unreal
I've seen Ronnie spar Michael Roberts and he wasn't made to look silly. Michael is a good boxer but Ronnie too big and strong for him. As for nothing to the table? Ronnie is the top ranked super feather in Scotland at the minute. That's why he's in a eliminator. Fighters like Ricky Burns and Kid Galahad don't ask for sparring from rubbish boxers
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

daviddee wrote:
Boxing Brains wrote:i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
He would beat everyone you have mentioned.. Some aren't even at his weight. You don't have a clue. You have your own agenda which is fair enough but your coming over like a silly troll
most of the boxers would fight ronnie at super feather. i have spoke to most of them and i can only tel wht has been said to me. you have your own agenda of stickin up for him but wait till he needs to fight some of these guys. real boxers born and bred lol
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by daviddee »

Boxing Brains wrote:
daviddee wrote:
Boxing Brains wrote:i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
He would beat everyone you have mentioned.. Some aren't even at his weight. You don't have a clue. You have your own agenda which is fair enough but your coming over like a silly troll
most of the boxers would fight ronnie at super feather. i have spoke to most of them and i can only tel wht has been said to me. you have your own agenda of stickin up for him but wait till he needs to fight some of these guys. real boxers born and bred lol
Ha you have spoke to them?? I've been there when fights offered to their managers.. Ask yourself why the fights haven't happened im not away to bad mouth fighters. I actually like most of the ones you have said but in fairness you have no idea of levels. Boxers think they can beat other boxers. It's all bravado it's the sport.. Proofs in the pudding
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

i aint michael or michael snr lol i would love that match up though because michaels boxing skillz would make ronnie look silly. maybe they can fight when ronnie has somethin worth fightin for because he brings nothin to the table. so you are tellin me that only the fights ive seen are the ones he looked bad :doh: what woulkd be the odds on that but the ones i havent seen he is a slick amazin boxer lol you are unreal[/quote]

I've seen Ronnie spar Michael Roberts and he wasn't made to look silly. Michael is a good boxer but Ronnie too big and strong for him. As for nothing to the table? Ronnie is the top ranked super feather in Scotland at the minute. That's why he's in a eliminator. Fighters like Ricky Burns and Kid Galahad don't ask for sparring from rubbish boxers[/quote]

ive been told from billy on more than one occasion that ricky easily beat ronnie up in sparrin and had to take it light with him. different leagues pal maybe he was only one whio would spar with glahad but the ingles dont like head sparrin anyway so maybe just wanted movement sparrin. if ronnie didnt run over to tommy gilmore he could have fought michael on sky his dad and the rest of his team wanted the fight
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by JamieM »

Listen you are now quoting these boxers and you clearly don't know ronnie as he isn't a troll like you, he will pull everyone if the fighters up
In public and ask if they want the fight, surely you can say who you are if you want to quote conversations? Ronnie has performed poor in many fights but that born and bred that you mentions he has, do you? Ryan Walsh is the worst he has fought Nd still should have won, would Michael Roberts fight Ryan Walsh? Featherweight now I guarentee he wouldn't
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

youve been there when the managers have been offered the fights. are you ronnies manager? because inly the managers woul dtalk about that to each other not in front of randoms. even if they did offer to managers obviusly the cash wasnt good enough to make the fight because all of these guys wold fight him for the right money its their jobs.
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by JamieM »

Michael Roberts wanted the fight? Away and boil your head you idiot, if you can't disclose who you are don't talk any further name dropping the lot, did you ever witness ronnie
Spar with Roberts or burns? Because I did and David did, man v
Boy when it comes to Roberts! Ronnie far to big for
Him
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by lefty »

How do you fellas think Ronnie would do against Simpson?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by expe »

Sklar wrote:
expe wrote:
Sklar wrote: I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.
Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.
That's up for debate. As I understand it the current legal position is that in the event of a 'yes' vote, Scots will be able to maintain dual nationality, as will the unborn children of all Scots alive at the time of the vote. The children of those children will not be British, however, as dual nationality may only be passed down one generation.
Anyone born before the referendum will be allowed to keep their British passport, normal citizenship rules will apply for anyone born after.

There's no debate at all, it's basic geography, England, Scotland and Wales form the island of Great Britain, whether they are in a political union or not. There's a difference between the UK and Britain, Northern Ireland is in the UK, but it isn't in Britain. After a yes vote Scotland won't be in the UK, but it will still be a part of Britain.
Boxing Brains
Super Welterweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Sep 2014, 11:59

Re: next scottish challengres

Post by Boxing Brains »

JamieM wrote:Listen you are now quoting these boxers and you clearly don't know ronnie as he isn't a troll like you, he will pull everyone if the fighters up
In public and ask if they want the fight, surely you can say who you are if you want to quote conversations? Ronnie has performed poor in many fights but that born and bred that you mentions he has, do you? Ryan Walsh is the worst he has fought Nd still should have won, would Michael Roberts fight Ryan Walsh? Featherweight now I guarentee he wouldn't
that will be tough of him. pull them up in public lol im sure that would get him a fight withg them :doh: if he really thought that he would have joined up with alex and not tommy but deep down he knew he would have to fight these guys soonr rather than later
Post Reply