Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post Reply

What is your opinion of the Mayweather-Maidana II undercard?

It's excellent
0
No votes
It's not bad
6
26%
It's poor, they should have made a better undercard
17
74%
 
Total votes: 23

Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by Freedom2013 »

What is your opinion of the Mayweather-Maidana II PPV undercard?

http://boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=693393
Jpreisser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 24 Jun 2010, 14:53

Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by Jpreisser »

It's weak. There are some notables, but they are largely in mismatches. I think Soto-Molina might be good.
beatdown337
Super Middleweight
Posts: 131
Joined: 21 Jun 2013, 12:20

Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by beatdown337 »

its pretty much par for the course these days.........
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by Boxing Writer »

If Molina - Soto fight wasn't there, I would say it's awful
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by Impractical Poster »

The best fight on the undercard is not even on the PPV card. Angulo/De La Rosa is the main event on the free preview. They must be hoping this match is so good it will edge the people on the fence to buy the PPV.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by stevedoc »

i hadn't realized it was so poor
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Undercard for Mayweather-Maidana II PPV

Post by Datsue »

fergusg wrote:
beatdown337 wrote:its pretty much par for the course these days.........
I agree! :TU:

People like to embellish their opinions for dramatic effect, but the fact remains the undercard is at very least on a par with the type events that Top Rank usually puts on.

Three questions mate, in light of your post:

1) are we still allowed to comment?

2) does what you've posted make it okay?

3) are you committed to playing Devil's Advocate about everything in the world? I mean, if someone was talking about the Armenian genocide, would you come along & correct them & explain how Rwanda was worse or something?

***

On-topic: Santa-Cruz's challenger is fornicate-awful. Yes, Quigg's is bad, but LSC's is terrible.
Post Reply