Gavin v Skeete

Post Reply
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Gavin v Skeete

Post by ste1983 »

Now confirmed on the Fury/Chisora undercard
Last edited by ste1983 on 23 Sep 2014, 08:16, edited 1 time in total.
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by bigB »

Think Frankie will box rings around him
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by Gazmac81 »

Good fight now as Skeete has been on decent run and Gavin coming off a tough loss

Pity Gavin vs Bundu couldnt have got made
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by Counter-puncher »

christ. stylewise, this is, god.......
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by black panther »

Counter-puncher wrote:christ. stylewise, this is, god.......

Haha yeah thrill a minute! Or not... :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz:
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by stevedoc »

this is a massive jump up in class for bradley i guess he has nothing to lose and all to gain
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32996
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by Boxerbeetle »

black panther wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:christ. stylewise, this is, god.......

Haha yeah thrill a minute! Or not... :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz:
Agreed. On paper it's a decent fight, in reality it could be dire.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by JimJim2009 »

I have been trying to figure out why Fwank would match two of his own fighters at this level. If Frankie loses, its knackered his career and ended his world title plans. If Skeete loses, that's three years of careful building down the pan.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by lefty »

Counter-puncher wrote:christ. stylewise, this is, god.......
See, personally i'd quite enjoy this matchup but then I enjoy the pure sweet science more than I do slug fests.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by JimJim2009 »

Bradley Skeete is the British Tommy Hearns.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by ste1983 »

JimJim2009 wrote:I have been trying to figure out why Fwank would match two of his own fighters at this level. If Frankie loses, its knackered his career and ended his world title plans. If Skeete loses, that's three years of careful building down the pan.
Because hes a promoter and part of promoter is building cards with competitive interesting fights which this is (granted I accept stylewise it might not come off but on paper its a very good fight).

If Hearn ever (which is doubtful) put two fighters he had in similar positions against each other people would be ranting and raving over how great it is they are going in together, but when Warren does it people question the motives?
righthook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by righthook »

i wonder if you can have a bet that skeete wont win a single round for how ever long it lasts??????
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by JimJim2009 »

ste1983 wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:I have been trying to figure out why Fwank would match two of his own fighters at this level. If Frankie loses, its knackered his career and ended his world title plans. If Skeete loses, that's three years of careful building down the pan.
Because hes a promoter and part of promoter is building cards with competitive interesting fights which this is (granted I accept stylewise it might not come off but on paper its a very good fight).

If Hearn ever (which is doubtful) put two fighters he had in similar positions against each other people would be ranting and raving over how great it is they are going in together, but when Warren does it people question the motives?
All promoters are cautious about doing it, which is common sense, it isn't a go at Fwank. I just don't see the point of building a fighter and putting him in with one of your own, if you can help it. You can build a card with competitive interesting fights without sacrificing your own prospects. I think the answer to my own question is that the board mandated the fight and Frankie won't vacate, so it has to happen.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1949
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by The Law »

This card is looking better by the day! Skeete v Gavin might surprise a few people and end up being an entertaining fight. Both of them have a decent fanbase, so it will sell tickets.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by JimJim2009 »

The Law wrote:This card is looking better by the day! Skeete v Gavin might surprise a few people and end up being an entertaining fight. Both of them have a decent fanbase, so it will sell tickets.
The cynic in me thinks the card is being stacked because even the promoter expects the inevitable cancellations. I hope it holds together though, (a) for the fans and (b) for the promoter, he's had his fair share of stick. I heard he got an ovation from the assembled media for holding together the Manchester show after Chisora and Fury separately withdrew. I'm sure nobody wanted to see the fight happen more than him.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:
The Law wrote:This card is looking better by the day! Skeete v Gavin might surprise a few people and end up being an entertaining fight. Both of them have a decent fanbase, so it will sell tickets.
The cynic in me thinks the card is being stacked because even the promoter expects the inevitable cancellations. I hope it holds together though, (a) for the fans and (b) for the promoter, he's had his fair share of stick. I heard he got an ovation from the assembled media for holding together the Manchester show after Chisora and Fury separately withdrew. I'm sure nobody wanted to see the fight happen more than him.
I'm not particularly worried about Fury and Chisora, neither have any major record for pulling out of fights, Sykes and Walsh should go ahead, although Walsh has pulled out of a fair few fights in the last few years and I don't think there will be many problems when it comes to Gavin-Skeete. I'm not sure whether Saunders-Eubank happens though, I can see Eubank's team pulling him out of the fight with a bullshit excuse, it's a big step up for him to make at this stage.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23243
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by handsofstone »

JimJim2009 wrote:Bradley Skeete is the British Tommy Hearns.
:lol:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23243
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by handsofstone »

JimJim2009 wrote:Bradley Skeete is the British Tommy Hearns.
:lol:
johnnygreaves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 910
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 07:41

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by johnnygreaves »

I always said to and about Bradley. He would start looking better against lads coming to beat him. Didn't start off looking great but that was because lads only came to mess him about.youve got to say he's looked more powerful in the last few fights.heard people saying he's fighting midgets but not many look big stood up next too him.fornicate. He hit me with the first jab & I thought he was miles away.id like to think I've been in with some punchers but brad hit me hard enough let me tell ya
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

You've got one overhyped fighter against one underrated, quite fancy Skeete here.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by expe »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:You've got one overhyped fighter against one underrated, quite fancy Skeete here.
I prefer to see it as a fighter at European/World level, as his last fight showed, against a fighter unproven at domestic level. It's a complete mismatch, Skeete has nothing to trouble Gavin with and it will show on the night.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by Boxing Prospect »

lefty wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:christ. stylewise, this is, god.......
See, personally i'd quite enjoy this matchup but then I enjoy the pure sweet science more than I do slug fests.
I don't mind the sweet science but...god Skeete bores the pants of me and Gavin has shown his ability to do the same.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Gavin v Skeete

Post by ste1983 »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
lefty wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:christ. stylewise, this is, god.......
See, personally i'd quite enjoy this matchup but then I enjoy the pure sweet science more than I do slug fests.
I don't mind the sweet science but...god Skeete bores the pants of me and Gavin has shown his ability to do the same.
Skeete hasn't really been boring since the Lynes fight has he. The 'Skeete's boring' tag frankly is boring now.

Still don't think he troubles Frankie though.
Post Reply