Who shot Frank?

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 22 Dec 2005, 18:01

The interviewer asked him if he knew who shot him, he said he did but wouldn't reveal the name.

He said he wasn't sure at the time but is now and that the person was a sad loser and always has been in everything they've done in their life.

I reckon he believes it was Marsh, when asked later what he thought of Marsh he said he was just another 'average fighter'. I don't think Warren would say that about an ex-fighter of his if there was no real grudge.

Should be able to download the whole 1 hour program in mp3 format tomorrow when they put it on-line at http://www.bbc.co.uk/fivelive

koomey · Post by **koomey** » 22 Dec 2005, 19:10

I think it's common knowledge that Marsh (allegedly) pulled the trigger, but of course there has been no proof.

This will stay secret along with the 'Mabeline' incident with Tyson...

Koomey

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 22 Dec 2005, 20:23

He also said a couple of years ago on the BBC documentary that he knows who done it, but it wasn't a boxer or boxing related.

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 22 Dec 2005, 20:26

Really? Interesting, if so then in quite clearly wasn't Marsh in his opinion.

Detective Goz.

E · Post by E » 22 Dec 2005, 22:21

Goz wrote:Really? Interesting, if so then in quite clearly wasn't Marsh in his opinion.

Detective Goz.

Or, frankly he may have been telling porkies....

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 22 Dec 2005, 22:39

stujones wrote:He also said a couple of years ago on the BBC documentary that he knows who done it, but it wasn't a boxer or boxing related.

Why did Marsh get the blame then?

pasty_spud · Post by **pasty_spud** » 23 Dec 2005, 03:18

well lets be careful cos marsh has sued afew people about this

BunglesFingers · Post by **BunglesFingers** » 23 Dec 2005, 05:39

From my recollection (a bit hazy) the case against Marsh was pretty weak and he wasn't the first or last person to have a dispute with FW.
I haven't read Marsh's autobiography yet, is it worth a look?

KO Artist · Post by **KO Artist** » 23 Dec 2005, 07:01

Goz wrote:Really? Interesting, if so then in quite clearly wasn't Marsh in his opinion.

Detective Goz.

A boyfriend of the flower girl, Nicola Tarrant did it.

Loftgroov · Post by **Loftgroov** » 23 Dec 2005, 07:20

Marsh may have been “behind it”, but I highly doubt he was the hitman. If you want that done you would go to someone who knows how, not just get hold of a handgun and attempt it yourself.

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 23 Dec 2005, 07:44

Goz wrote:The interviewer asked him if he knew who shot him, he said he did but wouldn't reveal the name.

He said he wasn't sure at the time but is now and that the person was a sad loser and always has been in everything they've done in their life.

That pretty much rules out Marsh I reckon - he was a winner all the way, never lost a fight.

Anyway, careful what you say people - allegedly is a v useful word...

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 23 Dec 2005, 07:58

Yes, no way could Marsh be described as a loser, and I doubt if Warren would have described him as such given his achievements. Perhaps Warren believed that Marsh paid someone else to do his dirty work?

It's a bit like who shot Jr all this innit?

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 23 Dec 2005, 08:07

Lee Harvey Oswald.

john2345 · Post by **john2345** » 23 Dec 2005, 08:17

This reminds me of a very old story (almost certainly wholly untrue) that Joe Erskine's wife or ex-wife's boyfriend was beaten up, and with Joe being such a light puncher rumour began to circulate that he'd hired Dick Richardson to do the job.... I should emphasise that all of this was probably no more than gossip at the time, so you can insert the word "alleged" where relevant!

J

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 23 Dec 2005, 08:31

Colonel Mustard.

mrbassie · Post by **mrbassie** » 23 Dec 2005, 10:25

Rocky Balboa · Post by **Rocky Balboa** » 23 Dec 2005, 11:12

I have heard from reliable sources that it was not a boxer who shot Frank!

Make no mistake, Warren knows who shot him, but he cannot do anything or have 'anything done', as he is 'small time' to the people responsible!

I am not naming any names, but I believe what I heard is the truth! Warren knows who shot him, yet he will not mention the purpetrator's name!

That says it all!

Cuban Lion · Post by **Cuban Lion** » 23 Dec 2005, 11:26

So a gangster did it?

Nels · Post by **Nels** » 23 Dec 2005, 12:00

So a gangster did it?

Doctor Dre?

hammer · Post by **hammer** » 23 Dec 2005, 12:08

one word micky duff.

Nels · Post by **Nels** » 23 Dec 2005, 12:10

one word micky duff.

What? Mickey Duff shot Doctor Dre? When?

steve689 · Post by **steve689** » 23 Dec 2005, 12:21

mrbassie wrote:TBA

Nah, TBA and Allegedly are both still on good working terms so i doubt it

Goz · Post by **Goz** » 23 Dec 2005, 12:28

Micky Duff is two words by the way.

Terence - Yes, I used to post on the BM forum, still look in from time to time but I don't like the format of it, you have to scroll through so much bollocks to weed out any good posts that may (or may not) exist.

Loftgroov · Post by **Loftgroov** » 24 Dec 2005, 07:54

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yes, no way could Marsh be described as a loser, and I doubt if Warren would have described him as such given his achievements. Perhaps Warren believed that Marsh paid someone else to do his dirty work?

It's a bit like who shot Jr all this innit?

No, because we know who shot JR...

hitman_hatton1 · Post by **hitman_hatton1** » 01 Jan 2006, 11:18

Goz wrote:Micky Duff is two words by the way.

Terence - Yes, I used to post on the BM forum, still look in from time to time but I don't like the format of it, you have to scroll through so much bollocks to weed out any good posts that may (or may not) exist.

BM was the first forum i started posting on. shame trish went and ruined it.

Who shot Frank?

Who shot Frank?

Re: Who shot Frank?