Fair enough Boxing News

Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Sklar »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
Horse wrote:
Boxing Prospect wrote:There was a COMPLETELY FREE card from Japan yesterday over ustream. No sign up, no nothing. No one on boxrec seemed to give two hoots. PPV is marginalising the sport but so are the fans who so often seem unable to care about the sport they claim they follow.
It wasn't worth watching.
Out of interest, did you watch it?
Hisataka Vs Kogawa was REALLY good, the 8th round would have had Max Kellerman creaming his pants, several of the undercard bouts were great, Ishida and Ishii really impressed me and Kohama has a VERY misleading record considering the skills he showed.
I can't get excited about Japanese boxing. I don't know who the fighters are and I can't relate to them. I've tried over the years without success.

Edit: the only Japenese sportsman I've ever warmed to is Sakuraba and why was that? Huge personality.
Boxing Prospect
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Sklar wrote:
I can't get excited about Japanese boxing. I don't know who the fighters are and I can't relate to them. I've tried over the years without success.
You can't get excited about talent and wars? Then that's a real shame. The likes of Arakawa, Yaegashi, Koki Eto, Kamegai, Inoue, Tanaka and Murata are all worth following intently.

Not knowing about the fighters leave you open to surprises, as Ishii and Ishida showed yesterday
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Sklar »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
Sklar wrote:
I can't get excited about Japanese boxing. I don't know who the fighters are and I can't relate to them. I've tried over the years without success.
You can't get excited about talent and wars? Then that's a real shame. The likes of Arakawa, Yaegashi, Koki Eto, Kamegai, Inoue, Tanaka and Murata are all worth following intently.

Not knowing about the fighters leave you open to surprises, as Ishii and Ishida showed yesterday
I can get excited about talent and wars but not when I don't know (or care about) the whys and wherefores. I can't invest the time it would take to get to know these fellows.
Boxing Prospect
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Sklar wrote:
Boxing Prospect wrote:
Sklar wrote:
I can't get excited about Japanese boxing. I don't know who the fighters are and I can't relate to them. I've tried over the years without success.
You can't get excited about talent and wars? Then that's a real shame. The likes of Arakawa, Yaegashi, Koki Eto, Kamegai, Inoue, Tanaka and Murata are all worth following intently.

Not knowing about the fighters leave you open to surprises, as Ishii and Ishida showed yesterday
I can get excited about talent and wars but not when I don't know (or care about) the whys and wherefores. I can't invest the time it would take to get to know these fellows.
I never got the approach of needing to know a fighter to enjoy a fight. If a fight is good then the names attached to it doesn't mean anything to me. Fred Smith fighting Yoshihiro Kaneko in a 4 round war would be more to my taste than watching Tyson Fury Vs Larryitus the Latvian bin cleaner in a mismatch.

Sorry for derailing this topic >_<
Last edited by Boxing Prospect on 11 Oct 2014, 12:59, edited 1 time in total.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22940
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by mickey1975 »

I prefer to know the fighter to be honest.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Horse »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Out of interest, did you watch it?
Hisataka Vs Kogawa was REALLY good, the 8th round would have had Max Kellerman creaming his pants, several of the undercard bouts were great, Ishida and Ishii really impressed me and Kohama has a VERY misleading record considering the skills he showed.
No, I didn't watch it. It was a sub-domestic level Japanese card.

I'm only interested in international fights when it's two top 15 world ranked boxers going at it.
Boxing Prospect
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Horse wrote:
Boxing Prospect wrote:Out of interest, did you watch it?
Hisataka Vs Kogawa was REALLY good, the 8th round would have had Max Kellerman creaming his pants, several of the undercard bouts were great, Ishida and Ishii really impressed me and Kohama has a VERY misleading record considering the skills he showed.
No, I didn't watch it. It was a sub-domestic level Japanese card.

I'm only interested in international fights when it's two top 15 world ranked boxers going at it.
So Kogawa, who probably should actually be the WBA interim Light Flyweight champion and a clear top 15 guy at 112lbs, is sub-domestic? I know the Japanese scene at Fly is insane (Ioka, Muranaka, Eto) but still...
I'll admit Hisataka isn't what he once was but it was less than a year ago that he was in a world title fight with #1 guy at 115lbs.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Horse »

Boxing Prospect wrote:So Kogawa, who probably should actually be the WBA interim Light Flyweight champion and a clear top 15 guy at 112lbs, is sub-domestic? I know the Japanese scene at Fly is insane (Ioka, Muranaka, Eto) but still...
I'll admit Hisataka isn't what he once was but it was less than a year ago that he was in a world title fight with #1 guy at 115lbs.
Kogawa is ranked 7th in Japan and Hisataka is ranked 12th. Japan has a lot of good fighters in that division so, fair enough, that fight qualifies as domestic level or higher, but the rest of the card didn't.

I also didn't know about the show, just like most others on here didn't, so I was never likely to watch.
dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by dbflex »

mickey1975 wrote:
MightyWarrior wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: They boycotted Fw shows under Claude.
I think they criticised FW one time, and had their credentials withdrawn. Then kept pretty much in line afterwards
They got stuck behind a ring post a long way back so boycotted the shows. I can't remember if it was connected but a letter from Fwank took up the full front page around that time.
Just to clarify, subsequent to that I criticised a Warren undercard and was banned from Sexton-Rogan II so we've hardly kept in line since Claude.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by reggaereggae »

dbflex wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: They boycotted Fw shows under Claude.
I think they criticised FW one time, and had their credentials withdrawn. Then kept pretty much in line afterwards
Just to clarify, subsequent to that I criticised a Warren undercard and was banned from Sexton-Rogan II so we've hardly kept in line since Claude.
Wow allegedly is such a pathetic control freak. What a tosser. And what a ridiculous long term strategy.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Counter-puncher »

@sklar: that's the bit i don't get, re back stories.

for me, 'the tall fella needs to maintain distance' or 'the southpaw needs to get his foot outside', is all the context i require.

i spent 20mins the other nite watching one of the better bareknuckle scraps, i skipped through the traditional 'His uncle fergus beat my uncle callum/ no fighting men in this county can beat a Monaghan' stuff, it wouldn't add anything that the sight of two reasonably-skilled, reasonably-prepared men trying to knock each others blocks gives me.

same goes for the fairly common argument, 'they are too small i cant relate to them', boxing would be a very small potential pool of interest if that affected me. Almost nobody in boxing can i relate to in that sense. Tall skinny white men with big noses are at something of a premium, though thinking about it i should probably treasure froch a little more whilst he is still around.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Counter-puncher »

Perhaps too simplistically i just assume, a fan of fighting is a fan of fighting, and a good fight is a good fight.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Counter-puncher »

Oh, and i also think that, if i may say so, if you did take a little time, you would find much in the Japanese boxing setup that would very much appeal to you. BP overplays the hand somewhat, now and then, as Defender of All Things Lower Weight and Japanese- its his franchise, so to say- but Japanese boxing has a quite ruthless, Darwinian, survival-of-the-fittest ethic, that i think would appeal to both your instinct and your reason.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Fair enough Boxing News

Post by Sklar »

Maybe. I bought wholesale into Pride and I've studied the Pacific Campaign in quite a bit of depth so I've not completely shut them out but their boxing has always passed me by.
Post Reply