Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
On the BoxRec Super Bantamweight rankings that is... Seems rather random lol
Last edited by PokerRob on 13 Oct 2014, 14:23, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relagated to number 3?
very strange ,i was just checking the p4p ratings and kell brook is rated @12 and rigo @ 48 ..... hows that work
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relagated to number 3?
Ward hasn't either. Is his rating dropping ?fergusg wrote:My guess… Guillermo Rigondeaux hasn't boxed an opponent with a rating of at least 50% of his own rating points within 18 months… and today is that anniversary (i.e. versus Nonito Donaire on the 13th April, 2013), which may be the reason why he dropped 200 points since his last fight.
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
Cool. Where are you finding old point counts ?
-
ttornado
- Heavyweight

Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
I hadn't tried that before, good tip.fergusg wrote: Enable "ratings" on each fighters bout list page to view their points history and then compare the stats to the current points totals in the P4P page.
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relagated to number 3?
Quillin's last fight against an opponent with a rating of at least 50% of his own rating in October of 2010, but I don't see that his rating has fallen.fergusg wrote:My guess… Guillermo Rigondeaux hasn't boxed an opponent with a rating of at least 50% of his own rating points within 18 months… and today is that anniversary (i.e. versus Nonito Donaire on the 13th April, 2013), which may be the reason why he dropped 200 points since his last fight.
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
fergusg is learning the way of the points well. Perhaps I will no longer have to answer all of these ratings questions by myself.
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
Nah, he missed the fact that 18 months is not always 568 days :)Lackeos wrote:fergusg is learning the way of the points well. Perhaps I will no longer have to answer all of these ratings questions by myself.
Re: Why did Guillermo Rigondeaux just get relegated to number 3?
It's actually never 568 days. I'm pretty sure 18 months can never be more than 550 days, and, on average, is about 548.ikorolev wrote:Nah, he missed the fact that 18 months is not always 568 days :)Lackeos wrote:fergusg is learning the way of the points well. Perhaps I will no longer have to answer all of these ratings questions by myself.