Lomachenko/Walters
-
pugilisticprofessor
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 208
- Joined: 19 Nov 2003, 02:02
Re: Lomachenko/Walters
Or if the guy is 20 pounds heavier.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Lomachenko/Walters
So, are we talking that he has the potential of being the caliber of Leonard then? Because as of now, he is not. But yes, it is still early in his career. Therefore, the statement sticks.Baby Face Finster wrote:I disagree. Any fighter can lose early in their career if they are matched up too hard.Impractical Poster wrote:A fighter the caliber of Leonard doesn't lose to Salido. Ever.victor-romeo wrote: I didn't say like I said caliber. My definition of caliber is level. I don't think their fighting styles are the same at all.
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17433
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Lomachenko/Walters
I am not agreeing that Lomachenko can or can not ever reach Sugar Ray Leonard's level but that basing it on an early loss is not logical because Leonard did not face as stiff a test early in his career as Lomachenko has.Impractical Poster wrote:So, are we talking that he has the potential of being the caliber of Leonard then? Because as of now, he is not. But yes, it is still early in his career. Therefore, the statement sticks.Baby Face Finster wrote:I disagree. Any fighter can lose early in their career if they are matched up too hard.Impractical Poster wrote:
A fighter the caliber of Leonard doesn't lose to Salido. Ever.
Lomachenko fought a world champion in his 8th pro fight if you count the AIBA World Series of Boxing bouts as pro fights. Leonard fought for his first world title fight in his 26th fight. You can't compare the two. If Ray had fought for a world title in his 8th pro fight I think he would have stood a good chance of losing.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Lomachenko/Walters
I see what you're saying. We are looking at it in different aspects. I assumed the poster was gauging Lomanchenko at the caliber of a prime Leonard. I agree with your assessment.Baby Face Finster wrote: I am not agreeing that Lomachenko can or can not ever reach Sugar Ray Leonard's level but that basing it on an early loss is not logical because Leonard did not face as stiff a test early in his career as Lomachenko has.
Lomachenko fought a world champion in his 8th pro fight if you count the AIBA World Series of Boxing bouts as pro fights. Leonard fought for his first world title fight in his 26th fight. You can't compare the two. If Ray had fought for a world title in his 8th pro fight I think he would have stood a good chance of losing.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Lomachenko/Walters
I don't think Ray Leonard fought that level of fighter as Salido that early in his career.Impractical Poster wrote:A fighter the caliber of Leonard doesn't lose to Salido. Ever.victor-romeo wrote:I didn't say like I said caliber. My definition of caliber is level. I don't think their fighting styles are the same at all.Evander wrote:^
He's not like Sugar Ray Leonard.