Totally agree with everything said but, as you also say, it wasn't always this way with him and I firmly believe in his inherent goodness. Their was plenty of vitriol spouted against all of the above mentioned boxers, but we forget that the proliferation of such media’s as this one and thousands more where the venting of opinions from absolutely everyone from all sides just did not exist to a greater or lesser extent back then.bripez wrote:This does sound like a troll post to me .....
However, to answer the question .... Amir Khan had massive public support following the Olympics.
So did Audley Harrison, although both have seen a decline in their popularity - even though Khan has been successful.
Previous comments have indicated possible reasons, and I genuinely do not think that it is a race issue. When you look back over the last 10 years or so and see which boxers have transcended the sport and had massive crossover appeal you are looking at Hatton, Audley, Khan, Naz, Nigel Benn, Chris Eubank, Frank Bruno etc. etc. so you can't tell me that race/colour/religion is a factor.
At the end of the day, Khan constantly comes across as a proper bell end, and this is the reason his popularity has declined.
I'm afraid to say most definitely that Benn and Eubank and Bruno would tell you of race/colour being a strong negative factor in their careers as all have all openly discussed this and written about it. For sure Errol Christie and Herol Graham would, and recently have, add to the argument.
It's easy to look back and maybe forget the initial dislike shown for those that eventually became national treasures.
There is no reason that with continued good showings, that a turn of affections both for Amir Khan and from Amir Khan cannot happen.