Lackeos wrote:Ward is better than Hopkins. There is a reason why the Ring has Ward at #2 p4p and Hopkins nowhere in the top 10. There are multiple reasons why Ward tore Dawson a new one, whereas Hopkins got clearly schooled by him. Ward would have dominated Jean Pascal as well. If anyone in this thread tries to claim that Ward has a worse chance against Kovalev than Hopkins did, then they don't know sh*t about boxing. You might as well claim that Mayweather is not as good as Erislandy Lara and/or doesn't have as good of defense, or would have less of a chance of beating Alvarez.
Ward is a little bit over-rated. Note the bold print. Froch is second best in his division yet has no great boxing skill just incredible heart and even more incredible stamina. Froch is a genuine hard man but not a great boxer.
The Ring can rate whoever, whatever they like they are not god and they don't have a domination on being correct.
Ward is very, very good BUT he's far from unbeatable.
Ward would not beat Kovalev or Golovkin. Unfortunately i can't see these fights ever happening.