Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitschko?
-
hulkmaniac
- Middleweight
- Posts: 399
- Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 21:56
Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitschko?
Both are getting up there in age and both have things going on in their personal life that might take away from their focus. Also their opponents are both undefeated and hungry. Who do you think has the greater chance of losing his upcoming fight?
Last edited by hulkmaniac on 13 Nov 2014, 23:27, edited 1 time in total.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1635
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
Pac More likely to lose, Although I would say Pulev is an intriguing opponent and don't put this down as a slam dunk win for Wlad.
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
Pacquiao. He is facing a taller unbeaten opponent in Chris Aligeri who is determined to make a splash in the Welterweight division.
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
If I had to pick one or the other it would be Pacquiao. Don't think that will happen though.
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
Wladimir.
He's 38 and Pulev is a big boy.
He's 38 and Pulev is a big boy.
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
I can see the arguement you are going with however. Despite Wladimir being 38 he is still quite fresh as he has not been in many tough fights.JCS wrote:Wladimir.
He's 38 and Pulev is a big boy.
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
Pulev is arguably the number 2 or 3 in the division right now, has a solid if not great resume to match a decent skillset.
Algieri has a good skillset, but very, very little to show on his resume so far.
Wlad fight is 60/40
Pac 70/30
Algieri has a good skillset, but very, very little to show on his resume so far.
Wlad fight is 60/40
Pac 70/30
-
PsychoGamerTwo
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 526
- Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 18:04
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
80/20Yes We Can wrote:Wlad fight is 60/40
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
I agree with this, however Pulev isn't a highly skilled boxer and Algieri is and on the same token Pulev is a great puncher and Chris Algieri isn't.Coldko wrote:Pac wins 90%....wlad-pulev is closer fight
The deciding factor will be if MP can land a punch on Algieri that puts him to sleep, I'm not sure if Pulev gets that opportunity vs Wlad.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
Since when is Pulev considered GREAT PUNCHER?KBB wrote:I agree with this, however Pulev isn't a highly skilled boxer and Algieri is and on the same token Pulev is a great puncher and Chris Algieri isn't.Coldko wrote:Pac wins 90%....wlad-pulev is closer fight
The deciding factor will be if MP can land a punch on Algieri that puts him to sleep, I'm not sure if Pulev gets that opportunity vs Wlad.
Re: Who is more likely to lose this month Pacquiao or Klitsc
tiny_acres wrote:Since when is Pulev considered GREAT PUNCHER?KBB wrote:I agree with this, however Pulev isn't a highly skilled boxer and Algieri is and on the same token Pulev is a great puncher and Chris Algieri isn't.Coldko wrote:Pac wins 90%....wlad-pulev is closer fight
The deciding factor will be if MP can land a punch on Algieri that puts him to sleep, I'm not sure if Pulev gets that opportunity vs Wlad.
I didn't realize I left off the "er" at the end of that meaning that he is a greater puncher than Algieri.