All we need is AJ vs Zack Page and Groves vs Brian Magee... Defo PPVRexob wrote:Cleverly trying to set up a 3rd match at the millennium stadium?
The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
That fight was pretty mediocre to say the least!
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
I just can't see how you could score it by 9 rounds to Bellew. Cleverly didn't land much other than jabs, but apart from the last 4 rounds, Bellew hardly landed anything, even in 9 and 12 he didn't land much. Cleverly's defence alone won him rounds for me.handsofstone wrote:I dont think anyone else will have my 119-110 card for Tony but Nathan was shockingly poor and i just didnt like none of his offensive work to give him barely anything
Not a close fight IMO,but im not arsed,i just dont want to see that again
-
wesley05
- Heavyweight

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
To be fare if you break it down it's only £1.00 per fight ish and the only bug bear was the main event 
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Worst Sky PPV since I've been a boxing fan (that includes Haye-Harrison, Magnificent 7, Groves-Degale etc). Completely uncompetitive undercard and a terrible main event between two guys who are no way good enough to be headlining a PPV.
If the Hearns can't admit they got this one wrong they'll have gone down in my estimation.
And if their answer is "it sold well", that's not an acceptable riposte.. How many people who forked out 17 quid tonight will have thought they got value for money? Haye-Harrison sold extremely well but it also did a lot of damage to boxing in the medium term. Hope they can learn from that and make sure this is a one-off mistake.
If the Hearns can't admit they got this one wrong they'll have gone down in my estimation.
And if their answer is "it sold well", that's not an acceptable riposte.. How many people who forked out 17 quid tonight will have thought they got value for money? Haye-Harrison sold extremely well but it also did a lot of damage to boxing in the medium term. Hope they can learn from that and make sure this is a one-off mistake.
Last edited by Jack B on 22 Nov 2014, 20:33, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
I want to know about Nathan's right hand/arm. Bellew was going on about the "great athlete" and the "great engine" - seemed to be like Cleverly was at 50% and for that reason, I would like to see the rematch.
Not on PPV, but I think there is unfinished business there - that is if there is something up with Nathan's hand/arm.
Not on PPV, but I think there is unfinished business there - that is if there is something up with Nathan's hand/arm.
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
rossij8 wrote:Feel I've being robbed watching a free stream
As a normal nights boxing it wasn't too dreadful..... But shameful for a PPV.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
I'd rather watch Mickey Bey rematch Miguel Vazquez live on TV when i have work at 7:30 am
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
haha!rossij8 wrote:Feel I've being robbed watching a free stream
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Eddie Hearn says that the belt holders want a piece of bellew. Of course they do.
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Can't blame Cleverly for trousering a few quid for the rematch but to be made to look so ordinary by Bellew gives you some sort of indication of how bad he was tonight. Just don't think he really wanted it.
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Frochy came as close as he could there to saying it was a shitty fight.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32993
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
At the Millenium Stadium?? Don't be ridiculous mate...has to be Wembley!danconnollyeire wrote:All we need is AJ vs Zack Page and Groves vs Brian Magee... Defo PPVRexob wrote:Cleverly trying to set up a 3rd match at the millennium stadium?
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Seriously? Bunch of one-sided rubbish and by the sounds of it a crap main event that ended unsatisfactorily.wesley05 wrote:To be fare if you break it down it's only £1.00 per fight ish and the only bug bear was the main event
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
jim watt asked the question in commentary "are these jabs actually being counted as scoring shots?" well yeh they were for me and bellew was allowing him to get away with it.why change tactics it was winning him rounds.clev got caught in the 9th and never ecovered bellew just had enough rounds left to catch up and win by two.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Maybe as a warm up fightmrbishi wrote:Eddie Hearn says that the belt holders want a piece of bellew. Of course they do.
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Catch weight will settle this
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Just the lack of anything but a poor pawing jab swayed me,i was impressed with Cleverly's defence as i said but as the first 8 rounds were so similar i suppose thats why my card is wide then with Bellews strong finish with Nathans workrate dropped to zero cemented itexpe wrote:I just can't see how you could score it by 9 rounds to Bellew. Cleverly didn't land much other than jabs, but apart from the last 4 rounds, Bellew hardly landed anything, even in 9 and 12 he didn't land much. Cleverly's defence alone won him rounds for me.handsofstone wrote:I dont think anyone else will have my 119-110 card for Tony but Nathan was shockingly poor and i just didnt like none of his offensive work to give him barely anything
Not a close fight IMO,but im not arsed,i just dont want to see that again
I tipped Cleverly but his hand clearly must be hurt,i seen none of they slappy combinations
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Usyk, Mchunu or Huck knock both of them silly. Rubbish fight. Clev should of never went up.
-
Fortynineandout
- Heavyweight

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
Absolute tosh ! Exactly as predicted by the majority of fight fans why it should not have been a PPV event .
Interested .. yes ...PPV absolutely not !
Stream not even an enjoyable nights entertainment.
Please no third fight - especially not as a PPV .
Interested .. yes ...PPV absolutely not !
Stream not even an enjoyable nights entertainment.
Please no third fight - especially not as a PPV .
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
I wasn't far off...only gave Cleverly 2 rounds.handsofstone wrote:I dont think anyone else will have my 119-110 card for Tony but Nathan was shockingly poor and i just didnt like none of his offensive work to give him barely anything
Not a close fight IMO,but im not arsed,i just dont want to see that again
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5195
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
rossij8 wrote:Feel I've being robbed watching a free stream
same here
-
Butcher695
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 17 Nov 2012, 05:29
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
3rd fight? When was the 2nd one?
Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread
about 15 minutes ago mate