The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Butcher695
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2
Joined: 17 Nov 2012, 05:29

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Butcher695 »

Ah that's what that was
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by digzee »

Would Nelson beat TB with 6 months training?
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

PPl asking for refund on twitter. Some report a crime.
the truth
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 12 Dec 2009, 11:54

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by the truth »

That fight was crap, cleverly clearly hand a problem
With his hand he must of needed the money , what a pile of tosh
jenko21
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 125
Joined: 27 Feb 2012, 12:32

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jenko21 »

I heard the fight was the Hagler-hearns of the cruiserweight division
Exoddus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1517
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 10:30

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Exoddus »

Bellew couldn't do anything to a bloke fighting with one hand. Overall I thought the PPV was terrible. Would have been a decent Sky Sports card but not box office :shame:.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27520
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by stujones »

Paul Smith world title shot?
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by ALI »

Any word on what went wrong with Cleverlys right hand?
gazza8
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by gazza8 »

SICK

sick cause i prob bought the hype. . . . . . :doh:

Johnny Nelson beats both these bums. . . . and id pay for that

Cleverly shouldnt have been back in a ring amd Bellew has found his level
Last edited by gazza8 on 22 Nov 2014, 20:55, edited 1 time in total.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32994
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Sky sports just tweeted that Cleverly didn't have a hand injury. So why the fvck wasn't he throwing the right hand?? Tactical decision?!? Bah, I'm going to bed, this isn't even worth my fvcking disappointment.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by reggaereggae »

ALI wrote:Any word on what went wrong with Cleverlys right hand?
he never mentioned it in the interview, right?

Can't wait for the 3rd fight..... I think they should charge £37.95
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27520
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by stujones »

ALI wrote:Any word on what went wrong with Cleverlys right hand?
Apparently Sky's reporter went into the Cleverly's changing room backstage and they reported no problem with hand..... Nobody seemed to believe it though.
mrbishi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 19:13

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by mrbishi »

A 3rd fight wouldn't fill rodney parade let alone the millennium stadium
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27520
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by stujones »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Sky sports just tweeted that Cleverly didn't have a hand injury. So why the fvck wasn't he throwing the right hand?? Tactical decision?!? Bah, I'm going to bed, this isn't even worth my fvcking disappointment.
That just shows what a shit tactical decision it was - the fact that everyone thought something had happened to his hand says it all.

His strength is his combinations, his engine throwing multiple COMBINATIONS!
Tangerine
Middleweight
Posts: 1306
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 17:33

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Tangerine »

im glad clev jabbed like a bitch,im glad it was a shlt fight.The bumlicking retweet crew will be giving poor Eddie and Sky plenty after this.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by MarkMcBurney »

jenko21 wrote:I heard the fight was the Hagler-hearns of the cruiserweight division
More 'Hearn-Earns'...
Wa1nuts
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 515
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 10:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Wa1nuts »

mrbishi wrote:A 3rd fight wouldn't fill rodney parade let alone the millennium stadium

I bet it would, Sky will just build it up even more and mugs will turn up and buy the PPV again. According to the commentators, it "really caught fire", in the last four rounds. I thought it was shocking. Bellew throwing slow punches against someone who can barely stand up.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5196
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Looks like the Kovalev loss ended Cleverly as an ambitious fighter. He's all about the money now.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by reggaereggae »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
jenko21 wrote:I heard the fight was the Hagler-hearns of the cruiserweight division
More 'Hearn-Earns'...
hahhahaha lol...

Oh well, cant wait for the 'clamour' in Hearns' column next week for fight 3
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Manchester Hitman »

I'm just about to email sky with a complaint demanding a refund or I will be cancelling
My subscription - I will post the responce.

this night was a disgrace and Adam Smith and co need to know that they have let the public down big time with this horrendous 'event'.
mrbishi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 177
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 19:13

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by mrbishi »

Manchester Hitman wrote:I'm just about to email sky with a complaint demanding a refund or I will be cancelling
My subscription - I will post the responce.

this night was a disgrace and Adam Smith and co need to know that they have let the public down big time with this horrendous 'event'.
You knew what you were getting in for.
jenko21
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 125
Joined: 27 Feb 2012, 12:32

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by jenko21 »

reggaereggae wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:
jenko21 wrote:I heard the fight was the Hagler-hearns of the cruiserweight division
More 'Hearn-Earns'...
and the winner fights ovill mckenzie in a world title eliminator.

hahhahaha lol...

Oh well, cant wait for the 'clamour' in Hearns' column next week for fight 3
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32994
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Manchester Hitman wrote:I'm just about to email sky with a complaint demanding a refund or I will be cancelling
My subscription - I will post the responce.

this night was a disgrace and Adam Smith and co need to know that they have let the public down big time with this horrendous 'event'.
Yeah, good luck with that mate. I believe Sky's unofficial corporate mantra is "Caveat emptor".
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by expe »

handsofstone wrote:
expe wrote:
handsofstone wrote:I dont think anyone else will have my 119-110 card for Tony but Nathan was shockingly poor and i just didnt like none of his offensive work to give him barely anything

Not a close fight IMO,but im not arsed,i just dont want to see that again
I just can't see how you could score it by 9 rounds to Bellew. Cleverly didn't land much other than jabs, but apart from the last 4 rounds, Bellew hardly landed anything, even in 9 and 12 he didn't land much. Cleverly's defence alone won him rounds for me.
Just the lack of anything but a poor pawing jab swayed me,i was impressed with Cleverly's defence as i said but as the first 8 rounds were so similar i suppose thats why my card is wide then with Bellews strong finish with Nathans workrate dropped to zero cemented it

I tipped Cleverly but his hand clearly must be hurt,i seen none of they slappy combinations
Preferred Cleverly's jab to Bellew landing nothing. Even in the last 4 rounds when Bellew supposedly came on strong I had Cleverly winning 2 of them, covered up well on the ropes and landed some good counters, Bellew wasn't landing anything clean, but Halling and Watt were giving him the rounds purely because he showed some attacking intent IMO, rather than him actually punching Cleverly.
vargas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 191
Joined: 19 Dec 2005, 10:46

Re: The official Cleverly v Bellew in play discussion thread

Post by vargas »

No one really comes out of that fight with any credit to be honest. Cleverly was as it turns out a blown up LHW. Bellew and his self proclaimed power at CW, couldn't stop a one armed man even with 12 minutes of punches at a static target.

Don't think Bellew can beat any of the belt holders at CW. Would be interesting to see him in with Ola Afolabi though.
Post Reply