Punch stats

Post Reply
Matt Teague
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 322
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19

Punch stats

Post by Matt Teague »

Did anyone see the punch stats for the Bellew clev fight please ?

Bellew acuracy was poor, however due to the fact clev was slipping shots well. Just curious to see the stats in this over hyped fight.... What a stinker
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Punch stats

Post by magwitch »

Bellew needed to stand off and shift his feet, give himself an angle and go round the sides, like Hatton used to. This is just my enthusiast's perspective :OhYes: ... Nathan was presenting a stationary target at times last night and Bellew bless him boxed down to Nathan's level. He was probably expecting a much harder fight. He needed to throw less volume, take a breather, and throw more quality, as Cleverly was allowing him the time to do so. Still, well done on the win Tony.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Punch stats

Post by Rexob »

From what I remember they both had less than 20% connecting? which is pretty shite.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Punch stats

Post by Finn »

Rexob wrote:From what I remember they both had less than 20% connecting? which is pretty shite.
Bellew was 15% cleverly was 14% is was very poor quality over 700 shots thrown each.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Punch stats

Post by Rexob »

Finn wrote:
Rexob wrote:From what I remember they both had less than 20% connecting? which is pretty shite.
Bellew was 15% cleverly was 14% is was very poor quality over 700 shots thrown each.
Yeah pretty awfull tbf.
Matt Teague
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 322
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19

Re: Punch stats

Post by Matt Teague »

14/15% yeah terrible. Thanks guy roll on the third fight :o
Post Reply