TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Who would you retire?

Terry O'Connor
33
59%
Howard Foster
17
30%
Another British Referee (please name & acclaim)
6
11%
 
Total votes: 56

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by crusader »

I think he put his hands up and gave a brief 'WTF are you doing' look, but no, he didn't protest vehemently.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by crusader »

lefty wrote:Ian John Lewis is by far the worse. These two make some clangers at times but he's in a league of his own.
His stoppage of McKenzie-Enzo I is the worst stoppage I've seen.

If I recall correctly he's also a poor judge.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23182
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by mickey1975 »

Howard is quite good, Terry has made some legendary blunders. IJS once came up with a literally impossible score in a PF fight, I can't remember which one.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by taffytoon »

crusader wrote:I think he put his hands up and gave a brief 'WTF are you doing' look, but no, he didn't protest vehemently.
Was this before he staggered back to his corner?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by crusader »

You can see him put his hands up yourself, which comes shortly after he got up almost immediately from the KD. He didn't seem to be staggering back to his corner to me, and I think he only seemed clearly unsteady when he was getting up and Foster had his hand on him. Boxing is a rough sport and I don't think fights should be called off simply because someone's legs weren't steady. In fact, in Periban's last bout prior to fighting Degale he had his opponent down and seemingly in much more trouble, yet the opponent got up, recovered, and eventually won. Periban not only didn't get that chance, he didn't even get a chance to beat a count.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MH3I--Ozbw
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by taffytoon »

Doesn't play in the UK
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by crusader »

Too bad. You should be able to find other videos showing the point I mean.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

taffytoon wrote:Doesn't play in the UK
You're in denial.

Explain Amir Khan being allowed to continue after the first Prescott KD when he went reeling backwards to his corner?

Explain Carl Froch being allowed to continue when he went down heavily versus Groves and looked totally out of it?

The inconsistency is baffling to boxing fans.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by taffytoon »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
taffytoon wrote:Doesn't play in the UK
You're in denial.

Explain Amir Khan being allowed to continue after the first Prescott KD when he went reeling backwards to his corner?

Explain Carl Froch being allowed to continue when he went down heavily versus Groves and looked totally out of it?

The inconsistency is baffling to boxing fans.
Well if you're talking boxing fans that is you out of the equation.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2727
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by Flump »

crusader wrote:You can see him put his hands up yourself, which comes shortly after he got up almost immediately from the KD. He didn't seem to be staggering back to his corner to me, and I think he only seemed clearly unsteady when he was getting up and Foster had his hand on him. Boxing is a rough sport and I don't think fights should be called off simply because someone's legs weren't steady. In fact, in Periban's last bout prior to fighting Degale he had his opponent down and seemingly in much more trouble, yet the opponent got up, recovered, and eventually won. Periban not only didn't get that chance, he didn't even get a chance to beat a count.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MH3I--Ozbw
The point is, if that he'd been DeGale he would have been allowed to continue. I don't think there's much argument there.

Btw I think Howard is a good ref usually.
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by taffytoon »

This video is not available in your country.

Sorry about that
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
taffytoon wrote:Doesn't play in the UK
You're in denial.

Explain Amir Khan being allowed to continue after the first Prescott KD when he went reeling backwards to his corner?

Explain Carl Froch being allowed to continue when he went down heavily versus Groves and looked totally out of it?

The inconsistency is baffling to boxing fans.

Froch did not look out of it at all - that's utter cobblers. His eyes were clear, and his legs were steady, if you watch the KD, as soon as his back hits the canvas, he begins getting up.

I agree with Khan, that was ludicrously biased - Khan was given every conceivable chance, despite the fact he was completely out on his feet. Similarly, Barrera was well and truly shafted, despite the fact that his cut hadn't worsened at all, it was suddenly deemed after four rounds he couldn't continue - a cynic might conclude, that this was in no small part due to the fact that due that 4 rounds had to be completed before it could go to the score cards.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by rhino222 »

Howard Foster is still good quality in my book, IJL is questionable but TO'C is farcical!!
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by brian13 »

mickey1975 wrote:Howard is quite good, Terry has made some legendary blunders. IJS once came up with a literally impossible score in a PF fight, I can't remember which one.
Wasnt a fighter got knocked down and he gave that fighter 30 points over the three rounds?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27519
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by stujones »

Lets not forget IJL refereed Shannon Briggs into a hospital bed vs Klitchsko.
SMALL AXE1
Middleweight
Posts: 233
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 09:40

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by SMALL AXE1 »

lefty wrote:Ian John Lewis is by far the worse. These two make some clangers at times but he's in a league of his own.
Agree. Idiot John Lewis by a mile.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by handsofstone »

Ive never seen Mark Green ref for ages,if thats even his name

Im sure Victor Loughlin's had a few bad days at the office but i cant remember any off the top of my head

The best officials are the ones you hardly see or hear from ,just going quietly about their job
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by Finn »

handsofstone wrote:
billy nelson wrote:Howard would be in my top 2 refs in the UK
Victor Loughlin's THE man
Richie Davis is shit hot.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by Dan Dares »

lefty wrote:Ian John Lewis is by far the worse. These two make some clangers at times but he's in a league of his own.
The way he let Vitali carry on kicking the shyte out of Briggs was disgraceful, and how he managed to score 78-76 for Tom Dallas against Zack Page was a fkin mystery to me.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by handsofstone »

Finn wrote:
handsofstone wrote:
billy nelson wrote:Howard would be in my top 2 refs in the UK
Victor Loughlin's THE man
Richie Davis is poo hot.
I forgot about Davies he good too,takes no poo, i remember him bollocking Bellew within about 20 seconds of a fight,just to warn him he better not start any monkey bizz

Might have been the first Cleverly fight
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4500
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by dookus »

brian13 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Howard is quite good, Terry has made some legendary blunders. IJS once came up with a literally impossible score in a PF fight, I can't remember which one.
Wasnt a fighter got knocked down and he gave that fighter 30 points over the three rounds?
That's quite possible under the ten point must system because the winner of a round always gets ten points (subject to point deductions by the referee). So if you suffer a flash knockdown but spend the remainder of the round using the opponent's head as a speedball you can still win the round 10-9 (or draw the round 10-10) despite having been knocked down once.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

How many of us would be happy to see Terry and Howard referee the Fury and Eubank fights this weekend?
GooalaShooola
Super Middleweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by GooalaShooola »

crusader wrote:
lefty wrote:Ian John Lewis is by far the worse. These two make some clangers at times but he's in a league of his own.
His stoppage of McKenzie-Enzo I is the worst stoppage I've seen.

If I recall correctly he's also a poor judge.
I'm still reeling from that one. There isn't another ref on the planet (actually scrap that, person on the planet) who would've stopped that fight then but he let the reputations of both fighters get in his head. I'd be a lot more bitter about it if Enzo hadn't been able to avenge it though! :box:

And yes, in case you couldn't tell, my vote in the poll goes to IJL.
Last edited by GooalaShooola on 26 Nov 2014, 08:29, edited 1 time in total.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13361
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by MightyWarrior »

Yes IJL ..dear oh dear, he's made some right clangers and under his watch Briggs ended up in intensive care. He doesn't seem the sharpest tool in the box either.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23242
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: TERRY O'CONNOR vs HOWARD FOSTER: WHO SHOULD RETIRE?

Post by handsofstone »

"When i say bweak i want you to bweak cwean"
Post Reply