Matchroom boxing

Post Reply

Do Matchroom do a good job?

Yes
28
47%
No
32
53%
 
Total votes: 60

WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Matchroom boxing

Post by WelshJack »

I think they do a decent job with the bills they put together, especially as you have atleast 5 50/50 fight coming up in January after a good bill in Hull and Dublin at the back end of this year. Forget PPV, do you think they do a good job.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by rd350lc »

agree it's got to be a good thing that there is more competition promotions wise, but Eddie don't half get carried away bigging up his fighters
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by expe »

WelshJack wrote:I think they do a decent job with the bills they put together, especially as you have atleast 5 50/50 fight coming up in January after a good bill in Hull and Dublin at the back end of this year. Forget PPV, do you think they do a good job.
I can only see 1 50/50 in January and the Dublin show was shite, full of mismatches and nothing fights.

They do ok on the whole, but most shows are either bad or average, it's not often we see a really good bill and with the fighters they have and Sky behind them, they should do better than that.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by cold187 »

eddie made a comment on boxingnews he is wrong

Saunders vs eubank is a 50-50 fight, he said what if it ends in a 2 round 1 sided beatdown, then its not 50-50 is it

he is wrong

if a 50-50 fight is one sided it shows a "excellent performance" from the dominating guy.
a 50-50 fight is based on people views/polls before and also on bookmakers

what happens in the ring is a different matter.
GooalaShooola
Super Middleweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 11 May 2013, 18:40

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by GooalaShooola »

There are a lot of things I dislike about Matchroom but ultimately I think the answer has to be Yes. They've raised the profile of boxing in this country significantly and it wasn't so long that Sky fight nights would be taking place in half full leisure centres instead of the arenas that host now.

I dislike that they have the monopoly of boxing on Sky Sports, I dislike that they are slowly but surely devaluing the British title by having so many of their boxers simply skip past it and I loathe the fact that the shambles on Saturday night was considered a Pay Per View.

Taking all that into consideration though, I still think British boxing would be far worse off without them.
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by WelshJack »

expe wrote:
WelshJack wrote:I think they do a decent job with the bills they put together, especially as you have atleast 5 50/50 fight coming up in January after a good bill in Hull and Dublin at the back end of this year. Forget PPV, do you think they do a good job.
I can only see 1 50/50 in January and the Dublin show was shite, full of mismatches and nothing fights.

They do ok on the whole, but most shows are either bad or average, it's not often we see a really good bill and with the fighters they have and Sky behind them, they should do better than that.
Jenkins v Limond
Crolla v Abril
Rose v Jones
Martin v Boylan
Goodjohn v Hibbert

Any of those 50/50?
longshot
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 11:53

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by longshot »

Do you really think Goodjohn vs Hibbert/Rose vs Jones are anything near 50/50 ? :lol: WOW
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by WelshJack »

longshot wrote:Do you really think Goodjohn vs Hibbert/Rose vs Jones are anything near 50/50 ? :lol: WOW
I think Hibbert and Jones will win, but they aren't one sided are they?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by expe »

WelshJack wrote:
expe wrote:
WelshJack wrote:I think they do a decent job with the bills they put together, especially as you have atleast 5 50/50 fight coming up in January after a good bill in Hull and Dublin at the back end of this year. Forget PPV, do you think they do a good job.
I can only see 1 50/50 in January and the Dublin show was shite, full of mismatches and nothing fights.

They do ok on the whole, but most shows are either bad or average, it's not often we see a really good bill and with the fighters they have and Sky behind them, they should do better than that.
Jenkins v Limond
Crolla v Abril
Rose v Jones
Martin v Boylan
Goodjohn v Hibbert

Any of those 50/50?
20/80
10/90
75/25
60/40
50/50
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by WelshJack »

You think Limond v Jenkins is 80/20 in Limonds favour?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by expe »

WelshJack wrote:You think Limond v Jenkins is 80/20 in Limonds favour?
Limond's a clear favourite, levels above Jenkins, don't see a reason to see it any way other than that.
MR T
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 09:06

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by MR T »

Jenkins will beat limond comfortably
WelshJack
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1332
Joined: 29 Mar 2013, 13:43

Re: Matchroom boxing

Post by WelshJack »

expe wrote:
WelshJack wrote:You think Limond v Jenkins is 80/20 in Limonds favour?
Limond's a clear favourite, levels above Jenkins, don't see a reason to see it any way other than that.
Haha you are in for a massive shock then mate and I hope the bookies are as clueless as you should be about 9/2 then?
Post Reply