BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post Reply
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by dalcumly »

The current Board Rule book states " Persons acting as Second to a boxer must wear a clean white, shirt, sweater or jacket. Coloured track suits may be worn."

Eubank Snr was wearing a black 'outdoor' suit.

Aside from the fact that he contributed nothing to his son's chances of beating Saunders, he made himself and the corner look like fools. So who was it who granted dispensation to Eubank Snr to flout the Boards rules.

If this particular rule is seen nowadays as being outdated -then lets get it changed - but until then the Rules should be enforced equally across the country.
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by DazDiCanio »

Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 777
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by REEVE »

i dont like the fact hes in the ring - i know myself that theres no way my trainer would let anyone else in the ring putting off the boxer while hes trying to corner (ex world champion, dad or otherwise) this is boxing :box: not wwf!
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by bripez »

DazDiCanio wrote:Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
He is doing what he wants and is getting away with it - therefore, is he pretending ?
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by tobyh5 »

bripez wrote:
DazDiCanio wrote:Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
He is doing what he wants and is getting away with it - therefore, is he pretending ?
Very good point
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by thepocketrocket »

bripez wrote:
DazDiCanio wrote:Carl Greaves tweeted about this also. Time they stopped pretending they're bigger than the sport.
He is doing what he wants and is getting away with it - therefore, is he pretending ?
That is why the board need to take action.

Still it is pretty funny. If Euwank Jnr had a proper trainer saying proper things in the first four rounds he may have won!!
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by Parson Cross »

I know it was bad - but nothing compared to the number of people chewing Liam Walsh's ear in the corner ! All shouting over each other. Mayhem.
whiteboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 19:48

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by whiteboy »

Snr mentioned after the previous fight where he got into the ring that he had cleared it with the board...
cobbler80
Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 04:42

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by cobbler80 »

The worst bit was when Ronnie Davies was told to stop talking when he was telling Jr he needed to knock him out

I'd have walked off there and then if i was Ronnie. He deserves better than being mugged off like that
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by dalcumly »

Although I'm being critical of Eubank snr in this thread it doesn't take away from my view that he is one of the best British boxers in the last 50 or so years, he was certainly one of the toughest.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by palooka »

It was all part of the illusion/marketing that Jnr was a natural, didn't need advice and that Snr and Ronnie Davies had so much confidence in his ability they didn't need to be concerned with giving advice and direction. That has been shown to be a conceit; Jnr is not the second coming of Charlie Burley and the set up for other boxers at his level and above ought to be good enough for him; people put a lot of time and effort into being accredited so they can be in the ring and deliver advice, if Snr wants to do that he ought to go through the same process.
Gaz_73
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 54
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:29

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by Gaz_73 »

dalcumly wrote:The current Board Rule book states " Persons acting as Second to a boxer must wear a clean white, shirt, sweater or jacket. Coloured track suits may be worn."

Eubank Snr was wearing a black 'outdoor' suit.
Aside from the fact that he contributed nothing to his son's chances of beating Saunders,
he made himself and the corner look like fools. So who was it who granted dispensation to Eubank Snr to flout the Boards rules.

If this particular rule is seen nowadays as being outdated -then lets get it changed - but until then the Rules should be enforced equally across the country.
Harsh.

There was a remarkable improvement in Junior's sitting, after Snr's interjection.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by palooka »

Gaz_73 wrote:
dalcumly wrote:The current Board Rule book states " Persons acting as Second to a boxer must wear a clean white, shirt, sweater or jacket. Coloured track suits may be worn."

Eubank Snr was wearing a black 'outdoor' suit.
Aside from the fact that he contributed nothing to his son's chances of beating Saunders,
he made himself and the corner look like fools. So who was it who granted dispensation to Eubank Snr to flout the Boards rules.

If this particular rule is seen nowadays as being outdated -then lets get it changed - but until then the Rules should be enforced equally across the country.
Harsh.

There was a remarkable improvement in Junior's sitting, after Snr's interjection.
:)
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by broomy7s »

Dave Coldwell also tweeted....

'Dear BBBofC - please don't tell me I have to wear tracksuit bottoms in the corner again.'
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by Rexob »

Who gives a toss, I though it was pretty funny him posing and his son 5 rounds down hilarious!
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by handsofstone »

I remember in 1 of Jr's earlier fights when Sr started entering the ring,he was told to change before he got in and he did

So i dont know why now he's getting away with it
Slim Cockney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 03 Apr 2013, 16:04

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by Slim Cockney »

The Board's rules apply to the lesser people.

New rules, a new administration and a new outlook is required.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5195
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Eubank Sr is the only person who Chris Jr. will listen to im sure.

Once Eubank Sr actually started talking to him and telling him what to do in the second half of the fight, I thought Eubank Jr dominated.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by gobbles »

Who cares? I take it that mean you can't wear T-shirts either, as many do
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8646
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by coneye »

palooka wrote:It was all part of the illusion/marketing that Jnr was a natural, didn't need advice and that Snr and Ronnie Davies had so much confidence in his ability they didn't need to be concerned with giving advice and direction. That has been shown to be a conceit; Jnr is not the second coming of Charlie Burley and the set up for other boxers at his level and above ought to be good enough for him; people put a lot of time and effort into being accredited so they can be in the ring and deliver advice, if Snr wants to do that he ought to go through the same process.
Very true , and what they did was convince everyone except Jnr ,, because for the first 6 rnds he looked like a rabbit in the headlights , , he actually looked like he did'nt want to be there , he was stiff slow ponderous , Then at sometime he woke up and decided to have a go , if he had done that in the first 6 he may have won , but then again he may off gassed out .

What he needed to be told from his dad , because he obviously will not listen to anyone else , was apply the pressure . But Dad was too busy posturing in the corner , thinking its about him not Jnr .
TopGun
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 24 Jun 2012, 05:27

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by TopGun »

I wish everyone would stop moaning, it makes it more entertaining. I love the whole Eubank Snr story. I love the fact he doesn't say anything in the corner, it's great TV!! :bag:
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8646
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: BBB of C Rule Number 3.12 (Chris Eubank Snr)

Post by coneye »

Thats excatly what it is GREAT TV ,, but its not what you pay for GREAT BOXING MATCHES , . . i want great tv i'll watch reruns of the Simpsons . Enjoy it while it lasts , because the way Jnr fights and the way snr acts , i doubt if promoters will want to work with them for much longer , UNLESS jnr learns how to box better.

Then if you want to watch comedy you will have to go hang around Brighton on sunday mornings , and wait for the monoculed one to do his daily strutt up the esplanade
Post Reply