Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Hearn suggesting the fight will be in Las Vegas, who we think it'll be against ?
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
I was thinking Mickey Bey but he's not ranked in ibf.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
is he going back to LW or staying at LWW?
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Lightweight is my guess and it's an Al Haymon fighter.
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
I reckon its John Molina.He's lost his last couple at Light welter and lost against Soto for a vacant ranking belt.That fight was also in Vegas aswell.Maybe Anthony Peterson but I'm sure he's moved up now.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13497
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Which lightweights are actually managed/advised by Al Haymon.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
This on the McDonnell Vs Tomoki Kameda card?
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Molina would be such a risk, I think Burns would get beat.LancashireLoyal wrote:I reckon its John Molina.He's lost his last couple at Light welter and lost against Soto for a vacant ranking belt.That fight was also in Vegas aswell.Maybe Anthony Peterson but I'm sure he's moved up now.
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
A clue it's none of the mentioned
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
In atlantic city. Him and his team bottled it. Gavin rees got the shot instead. Broner was an animal at 135, unbeatable imo.G0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
Last edited by rio on 08 Dec 2014, 22:13, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
rio wrote:In atlantic city. Him and his team bottled it. Gavin rees got the poo instead. Broner was an animal at 135, unbeatable imo.G0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
I thought he got an offer at 130, then vacated - then did the same at 135 for a unification?
This is why it's imperative to make fights when they are red hot, such as Fury vs Price etc - because nobody cares when one is derailed.
And usually when they derail, its a fight they are expected to win and for a fraction of the money.
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
I think a prime Duran might have had a shot.....rio wrote:In atlantic city. Him and his team bottled it. Gavin rees got the poo instead. Broner was an animal at 135, unbeatable imo.G0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Fed to the lions for 'life changing money' ....and don't forget the tv rights
Is my guess
Is my guess
-
David McAllister
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 05:27
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
I just wonder if it might be Denis Shafikov? He is still rated highly and is boxing in Vegas this weekend.
-
ScottDetonator
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
I'd think Shafikov would absolutely batter Ricky tbh.David McAllister wrote:I just wonder if it might be Denis Shafikov? He is still rated highly and is boxing in Vegas this weekend.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Haymon doesn't handle the sort of opponent you'd put Ricky in with if you were rebuilding him in this country.
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Broner was mandatory at super feather, they moved up, then they were offered it at 6-7 weeks notice at lightweight, turned it down, Rees took the shot instead.G0mez wrote:rio wrote:In atlantic city. Him and his team bottled it. Gavin rees got the poo instead. Broner was an animal at 135, unbeatable imo.G0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
I thought he got an offer at 130, then vacated - then did the same at 135 for a unification?
This is why it's imperative to make fights when they are red hot, such as Fury vs Price etc - because nobody cares when one is derailed.
And usually when they derail, its a fight they are expected to win and for a fraction of the money.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Ossie or Roberto?Loynesy wrote:I think a prime Duran might have had a shot.....rio wrote:In atlantic city. Him and his team bottled it. Gavin rees got the poo instead. Broner was an animal at 135, unbeatable imo.G0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Loynesy wrote:I think a prime Duran might have had a shot.....rio wrote:In atlantic city. Him and his team bottled it. Gavin rees got the poo instead. Broner was an animal at 135, unbeatable imo.G0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
& Broner's always been Broner, his defence has always been flawed & exploitable & his lack of experience just as marked; it's just below welter he was probably fifteen pounds heavier than the poor bastards he was being fed (& in the case of Escobedo, he didn't even bother to make the weight at the weigh-in nor the rearranged "safety" check weigh-in, so fvck-knows how many pounds he had on Vicente. The pudendum).
I personally think a properly great lightweight would fvck him up no matter how much he outweighed them by, & if they levelled the playing field & he had to actually make 9st 9lbs properly, he'd do fvck-all & keel over after a few rounds versus someone proper.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
This.G0mez wrote:quote]
:OhYes:
& Broner's always been Broner, his defence has always been flawed & exploitable & his lack of experience just as marked; it's just below welter he was probably fifteen pounds heavier than the poor bastards he was being fed (& in the case of Escobedo, he didn't even bother to make the weight at the weigh-in nor the rearranged "safety" check weigh-in, so fvck-knows how many pounds he had on Vicente. The pudendum).
I personally think a properly great lightweight would fvck him up no matter how much he outweighed them by, & if they levelled the playing field & he had to actually make 9st 9lbs properly, he'd do fvck-all & keel over after a few rounds versus someone proper.
Imagine what 135lb Mosley would have done to him, or Corrales, or Castillo, or Stevie Johnston. Believed his own hype too much.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
no he didn't get offered telephone number, no life changing money at allG0mez wrote:Didn't he get offered telephone numbers to fight Broner in Vegas once ?
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
DavidPayne wrote:This.G0mez wrote:quote]
![]()
& Broner's always been Broner, his defence has always been flawed & exploitable & his lack of experience just as marked; it's just below welter he was probably fifteen pounds heavier than the poor bastards he was being fed (& in the case of Escobedo, he didn't even bother to make the weight at the weigh-in nor the rearranged "safety" check weigh-in, so fvck-knows how many pounds he had on Vicente. The pudendum).
I personally think a properly great lightweight would fvck him up no matter how much he outweighed them by, & if they levelled the playing field & he had to actually make 9st 9lbs properly, he'd do fvck-all & keel over after a few rounds versus someone proper.
Imagine what 135lb Mosley would have done to him, or Corrales, or Castillo, or Stevie Johnston. Believed his own hype too much.
Should have made myself clearer. ...I meant broner at 135 was unbeatable against the current crop of fighters at taht weight.....bay, abril, velasquz, mitchell, crolla , burns ect
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Good point mate, sorry for jumping on it.rio wrote:Should have made myself clearer. ...I meant broner at 135 was unbeatable against the current crop of fighters at taht weight.....bay, abril, velasquz, mitchell, crolla , burns ectDavidPayne wrote:This.G0mez wrote:quote]
![]()
& Broner's always been Broner, his defence has always been flawed & exploitable & his lack of experience just as marked; it's just below welter he was probably fifteen pounds heavier than the poor bastards he was being fed (& in the case of Escobedo, he didn't even bother to make the weight at the weigh-in nor the rearranged "safety" check weigh-in, so fvck-knows how many pounds he had on Vicente. The pudendum).
I personally think a properly great lightweight would fvck him up no matter how much he outweighed them by, & if they levelled the playing field & he had to actually make 9st 9lbs properly, he'd do fvck-all & keel over after a few rounds versus someone proper.
Imagine what 135lb Mosley would have done to him, or Corrales, or Castillo, or Stevie Johnston. Believed his own hype too much.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Ricky Burns next opponent ?
Crawford would outbox him so badly you would actually see broner's brain fart