Jimmy Vincent

Post Reply
danal2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 101
Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 13:48

Jimmy Vincent

Post by danal2 »

Just looking through my old Boxing News and read the article by Matthew Bozeat, he struck me as real kind hearted, but tough sort of guy...
Last edited by danal2 on 23 Apr 2017, 05:01, edited 1 time in total.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Sklar »

I don't know how he's doing and would be interested to know too. I was a keen supporter of Jennings but Jimmy wasn't himself that night. I know he lost his son in 2006 and the kid may have been already diagnosed at the time of the Jenning's fight (I don't know that to be the case).
Bleak
Cruiserweight
Posts: 694
Joined: 21 Oct 2010, 17:23

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Bleak »

Remember him fighting a great fight v barnes lost by a point or 2
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by palooka »

Jimmy used to live and train up in Doncaster, he trained at the Tadcaster Arms in Armthorpe. I spoke to John Ruston recently and he speaks highly of Jimmy who took the sport seriously and was a game fighter; he turned pro young and was matched hard. I remember watching Jimmy v Gary Jacobs and the very top men were a bit too much for him, though I saw Gary a few years after and how he got down to welter I do not know. The boxers that trained alongside him speak highly of him. I hope he's doing well now.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Rexob »

Bleak wrote:Remember him fighting a great fight v barnes lost by a point or 2

Yes, I remember that fight, he got proper robbed that night.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Parson Cross »

I will never get over that robbery.
This is why some of the recent threads get my goat about "robbery".
This beats em all.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by DavidPayne »

Colin Dunne v Martin Jacobs was worst I remember.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by hurlock »

Feck off Payne!! I was there it was under par but he still won!!

As for Barnes I remember Vincent pishing it & wazza even going to the corner to urge Barnes on to pull it out the bag & Barnes was flying at that time & a real decent prospect obviously mentally weak & lacks belief now but on his day a real good kid
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by black panther »

Great value fighter was Vincent and should have been British champion. His fight with Walker was a corker as was the Barnes fight.

Hope he's doing okay now.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Parson Cross »

The Board ordered a rematch and still Wazza found a way out of it and set Jimmy up for a fall.
DAVE2005
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 259
Joined: 13 Jul 2005, 11:57

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by DAVE2005 »

Parson Cross wrote:The Board ordered a rematch and still Wazza found a way out of it and set Jimmy up for a fall.
They did,but I think Barnes vacated the title rather than have the fight again.so mike stepped in and we know the rest.
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Gazmac81 »

i believe Vincent got a shot at Eamon Magee for the commonwealth Title on a big Warren show.

so the rematch didnt need to happen , shrewd move by wazza

BArnes didnt vacate cause my Brother fought him for title not long after

DAVE2005 wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:The Board ordered a rematch and still Wazza found a way out of it and set Jimmy up for a fall.
They did,but I think Barnes vacated the title rather than have the fight again.so mike stepped in and we know the rest.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by thepocketrocket »

It was the WBU belt that Vincent ended up fighting for. Warren paid Vincent well to swerve Barnes. It was a big story at the time due to Vincent getting loads of sympathy for having his 'dreams' of being British champion shattered.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by DavidPayne »

hurlock wrote:Feck off Payne!! I was there it was under par but he still won!!

As for Barnes I remember Vincent pishing it & wazza even going to the corner to urge Barnes on to pull it out the bag & Barnes was flying at that time & a real decent prospect obviously mentally weak & lacks belief now but on his day a real good kid
Well my recollection is different Hurlock. Being there gives you a perspective, I wouldn't assume a better one than my sofa.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Parson Cross »

On the money Pocket.
Snake.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by thepocketrocket »

Parson Cross wrote:On the money Pocket.
Snake.

On the flipside, Vincent made the business decision to take the cash rather than go for the title . Unless there is anything else to the story (there may well be) then it isn't like he was shafted; we all knew what was happening.

Looking back, it was probably the first sign that Barnes was never really going to make it. I know he beat Hare later on, but that seemed the rare decent result.

And to think I rated him above Macklin back in the day.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by Parson Cross »

He didn't have a choice.
He was told he was vacating and he wouldn't get a shot at the vacant title.
Play on words - but the Board only ordered a rematch with Barnes.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Jimmy Vincent

Post by thepocketrocket »

Parson Cross wrote:He didn't have a choice.
He was told he was vacating and he wouldn't get a shot at the vacant title.
Play on words - but the Board only ordered a rematch with Barnes.
Really? Well, my bad. Even back in the day I thought Vincent had opted for cash over the title
Post Reply