tarver v haye

Post Reply
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

tarver v haye

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

Antonio has been pretty vocal about fighting Haye. He must be pretty old by now but I think it would be a ok fight, considering Haye hasn't fought in like two years now
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tarver v haye

Post by crusader »

Haye would win fairly easily in my opinion and I don't find it an interesting bout. Tarver may have beaten the uninterested Banks but it's important not to forget how he looked against Kayode, and how the latter subsequently performed against a genuine HW in Ortiz.

Haye, for all the nonsense I think he can talk, is clearly the second best guy in the division when he's on in my opinion.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: tarver v haye

Post by SenorPipino »

Haye insists that 2015 will be the "Year of the Hayemaker," so a comeback appears imminent. Claims his shoulder is apparently recovered and he's punching harder than ever.
So a matchup with Tarver could be in the offing.
Have to agree with crusader that a bout with Tarver would be a routine "get the rust out" workout for Haye.
Despite his pullouts and his infamous "little toe" escapade with Klitschko, Haye may very well be the second best heavy out there. Tarver wouldn't prove much of a comeback obstacle.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: tarver v haye

Post by Horse »

crusader wrote:Haye, for all the nonsense I think he can talk, is clearly the second best guy in the division when he's on in my opinion.
Haye hasn't fought in 2.5 years and I don't think he's clearly better than Povetkin or Fury.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: tarver v haye

Post by tiny_acres »

I am still trying to figure out how Haye has this great heavyweight resume????
He barely got the decision over Valuev.Knocked out a faded and over the hill Ruiz
and beat Chisora who everyone called a bum when Fury beat him

But some how Haye is the freaking second coming of Jesus himself according to some idiots.
He hasn't fought in 2 and a half years and is no spring chicken.We have no idea how much he
has left in the tank to begin with.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: tarver v haye

Post by tiny_acres »

fergusg wrote:
tiny_acres wrote:I am still trying to figure out how Haye has this great heavyweight resume????
He barely got the decision over Valuev.Knocked out a faded and over the hill Ruiz
and beat Chisora who everyone called a bum when Fury beat him

But some how Haye is the freaking second coming of Jesus himself according to some idiots.
He hasn't fought in 2 and a half years and is no spring chicken.We have no idea how much he
has left in the tank to begin with.
Read my carefully-worded post again and then compare his resume to the likes of Stiverne, Wilder and Fury.
Ferg I respect your opinion.But I do not agree with it.Haye has a mediocre resume as a heavyweight.
And Stiverne and Wilders resume's are pathetic.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tarver v haye

Post by crusader »

Horse wrote:
crusader wrote:Haye, for all the nonsense I think he can talk, is clearly the second best guy in the division when he's on in my opinion.
Haye hasn't fought in 2.5 years and I don't think he's clearly better than Povetkin or Fury.
That's why I added the last part of the post. If he comes back and has regressed he may no longer be the best guy after Wlad, but if he largely retains his form from his HW stint I suspect that he'd be the second best in the division. Guys like Povetkin and Fury may have stronger resumes, though Chisora is arguably Fury's best win and I thought Haye beat Chisora even more impressively, but resumes don't equate to ability.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: tarver v haye

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

I don't know if it's just me, but I don't rate fury very much. I would pick Haye over him any day
Othro
Middleweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 23 Apr 2014, 21:28

Re: tarver v haye

Post by Othro »

I think Tarver has the skill set to beat Haye but is probably too old to do so.
zorndeslammes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 537
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 00:21

Re: tarver v haye

Post by zorndeslammes »

David Haye has incredible potential as a fighter. I'd never knock that aspect about him. The Klitschko fight gave him a war chest to tend to and become a part time boxer in addition to being a horrible non-contest thanks to Haye's refusal to engage and attempt winning the fight. That will forever stain my viewpoint of Haye in my mind. Yeah, maybe that was smart on his part, I won't lie, but I don't watch boxing to see guys make brilliant business moves. After all, the smartest move is to never get hit in the head for money to begin with.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: tarver v haye

Post by Lackeos »

I also think David Haye is second best in the division if active. He's got the abilities of an all-time great, minus the resume because he's always cared more about retirement than chasing good fights. But he came a lot closer to beating Wlad than Povetkin and Pulev did, he beat Valuev, and he turned Chisora's lights off. You're not going to find anyone else with two top 10 wins and who came close to beating Wlad in his prime.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: tarver v haye

Post by cold187 »

only non klitschko fighters with better resumes are

1. povetkin - charr, takam, chambers, Byrd, chagaev
2. pulev - dimitrenko, Thompson, ustinov
3. fury - Cunningham, chisora x2, Johnson (before he came a gatekeeper)
4. Jennings - Perez, szpilka
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: tarver v haye

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Lackeos wrote:I also think David Haye is second best in the division if active. He's got the abilities of an all-time great, minus the resume because he's always cared more about retirement than chasing good fights. But he came a lot closer to beating Wlad than Povetkin and Pulev did, he beat Valuev, and he turned Chisora's lights off. You're not going to find anyone else with two top 10 wins and who came close to beating Wlad in his prime.
What are you talking about?
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: tarver v haye

Post by cold187 »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
Lackeos wrote:I also think David Haye is second best in the division if active. He's got the abilities of an all-time great, minus the resume because he's always cared more about retirement than chasing good fights. But he came a lot closer to beating Wlad than Povetkin and Pulev did, he beat Valuev, and he turned Chisora's lights off. You're not going to find anyone else with two top 10 wins and who came close to beating Wlad in his prime.
What are you talking about?
exactly

pulev came close and he was still light-years away.
Post Reply