Deontay Wilder Haters

Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Tarkus »

Win or loose, always make sure you lay down THE HATE like bricks thick and fast. :doh:
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Chepppaaa »

crusader wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:
crusader wrote:It seems to me like today skepticism and reasonable criticism are often conflated with hating.

I was impressed by how he boxed in a disciplined manner for 12 rounds, but beating Stiverne--a good fighter but nonetheless an underdog whose best wins were a come from behind victory over Ray Austin and the pair of wins over Arreola--isn't enough for me to be confident that he'll ever rule the division. I think he's top 5 for sure though, and I'm looking forward to seeing him fight more good opponents of various styles and sizes.

sorry, but that stupid. if there was a ton of guys like tyson, holyfield or bowe today, than i also would truly be skeptical of wilder would rule the division as clear cut #1.

but as of todays heavyweight reality, there is little doubt that he is the future. him or jushua. top 5 is total bullcrap.

povetkin couldnt ko a cruiserweight and was almost losing, some say lost to a guy like huck, a guy wilder would in 2 rounds
stiverne was rated 4 at boxrec and was in most everybodys top 4 and he won like 2 rounds and basicly got chredded
glazkov, a guy who got a SD against scott :doh:
fat solis :doh:
jennings, who is flatfooted and by far not as powerful or athletic as wilder.....
slow, limited, unathletic pulev...... :doh:

there is wlad, fury, wilder. wlad, i dont list him even as a boxer, because he is a wrestler and should be dq in every fight. fury is totaly overrated, just happens to be lucky he is tall. but against somebody close as tall as him and much more athletic he wont have a chance.
This showing isn't enough for me to be convinced that he will consistently impress against and beat top fighters to an extent that can be considered ruling the division. In the first place, performances fluctuate for better or worse based on many factors, and it tends to be in the long-run when equilibrium is found. I'm thus very reluctant to make such strong claims about a fighter when they've beaten a grand total of one top ten opponent, and even tonight you could see that Wilder wasn't as potent as he was against his previous foes; he has a 97 percent KO ratio overall, but a 0 percent KO ratio against top ten opponents.

Second, and I mentioned this several times before the fight, but I think Stiverne was significantly overrated. Despite much of the talk of Wilder's weak resume, Stiverne's was largely filled with mediocre opponents, he lost to one of them and drew with another, and his two most notable victims are Austin and Arreola, both of whom were ahead when they were stopped. To me Wilder beating Stiverne as he did tonight was not much more impressive than Fury recently shutting out and stopping Chisora, a fighter with a deeper resume and comparable ability to Stiverne in my opinion.

Third, Stiverne is undersized for a HW and I think it's unlikely that the style Wilder used tonight would work as effectively against people closer to his height, which includes fighters like Wlad, Fury, Joshua, and Pulev. I also believe that Povetkin, who is roughly Stiverne's size, has more tools to beat Wilder than Stiverne does, not to mention that to rule a division one must be consistent enough that they avoid significant upsets that aren't seen coming, such as those Wlad and Stiverne himself incurred. Wilder has yet to show his dominance against such a range of top opponents and that he'll consistently turn away lower rated but arguably dangerous foes such as Wach and Price.

I am not doubting that Wilder is a good fighter who is generally fun to watch and adding excitement to the HW scene, but at this point there isn't enough evidence for me to be confident that he ever rules the division. I think there are several fighters in the division who have decent chances of beating him and more good fighters who are not currently on my radar may soon emerge. I think it's reasonable to favor Wilder over almost everyone in the division as you do, but he can hardly be considered an inevitable ruler until he consistently shows his dominance against the best HWs in the world. Wlad has done this for years, yet some people think a decision over Bermane Stiverne outweighs all that.

most heavyweight are undersized, thats why you rate them on the same level as wilder and putm in a top 5
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Blodhemn »

Badhusker wrote:
Blodhemn wrote:World champion? Stiverne was gifted a vacant belt against a guy he previously beat.
I get your point, but it's not Stiverne's fault he beat who they said he had to beat to get the title. Its not like he avoided anyone to get there. Wasn't he in line to fight Vitali for a year or two? My point is, I was just saying he was the world champ, and is definitely better than just an average fighter. Whether he was worthy of the title or not is an opinion. There are vacant titles all the time that are "gifted" to undeserving guys I guess.
He should've gotten a shot at Vitali if Vitali cared less about the situation in Ukraine, and everybody knows how that'd turn out. Stiverne would be called an undeserving bum after getting pummeled. He's very average and got rated solely from beating Arreola.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by crusader »

Cheppa-The only HWs I rank above him now are 6'6" Wlad, 6'9" Fury, and 6'2" Povetkin, the latter of whom I believe is better than Stiverne.
He should've gotten a shot at Vitali if Vitali cared less about the situation in Ukraine, and everybody knows how that'd turn out. Stiverne would be called an undeserving bum after getting pummeled. He's very average and got rated solely from beating Arreola.
Yes, I doubt that there would be much praise for either Klitschko were they to decision Stiverne in a bout that many had 9-3/8-4. I think there would be ample talk of Stiverne being overweight though.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Syntax Error »

And the prize for the most ridiculous thread ever started goes to................................................! :witzend:

Whoever coined the word 'hater' should be doing 45 to life, if they're not dead already: they sure have a lot to answer for! :roll:
Last edited by Syntax Error on 18 Jan 2015, 10:15, edited 1 time in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by crusader »

Syntax Error wrote:And the prize for the most ridiculous thread ever started goes too................................................! :witzend:

Whoever coined the word 'hater' should be doing 45 to life, if they're not dead already: they sure have a lot to answer for! :roll:
Must be another dumb Euro

(just jokes)
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Badhusker »

crusader wrote:Cheppa-The only HWs I rank above him now are 6'6" Wlad, 6'9" Fury, and 6'2" Povetkin, the latter of whom I believe is better than Stiverne.
He should've gotten a shot at Vitali if Vitali cared less about the situation in Ukraine, and everybody knows how that'd turn out. Stiverne would be called an undeserving bum after getting pummeled. He's very average and got rated solely from beating Arreola.
Yes, I doubt that there would be much praise for either Klitschko were they to decision Stiverne in a bout that many had 9-3/8-4. I think there would be ample talk of Stiverne being overweight though.
I think there is a valid argument that Stiverne was at least as good as the last several guys that Vitali did fight though.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by crusader »

There definitely is, but Vitali got virtually no credit for beating those opponents and I highly doubt that Wlad would get much credit for beating Stiverne as Wilder did tonight. I suspect that some of the people who are lauding Wilder and declaring him Wlad's future conqueror would be criticizing Wlad for failing to halt and arguably dropping 4 rounds to an overweight opponent who was losing to Austin and Arreola when he stopped them, though admittedly there is bias on both sides.
zorndeslammes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 537
Joined: 01 Jul 2007, 00:21

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by zorndeslammes »

I stand by a previous statement made that Anthony Joshua is the true future. I have nothing against Wilder and think he's a great athlete. I also haven't seen anything from him yet that indisputably makes me thing I should elevate him well above Tyson Fury as a heavyweight contender. Both guys have size, limitations in craft, and are great interviews. We're richer to have them, even if I don't think either can be a long time usurper to the heavyweight throne.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Cap »

Deontay Klitschko...uh...Wilder won decisively over a guy that many fans, including myself, thought would knock him out. Got to give the guy credit. The Canadian judge generously awarded him every single round. I mean, I understand being polite, it's a great Canadian tradition, but objectivity would be more welcome. The key to Wilder's victory was that nice straight left jab. It was like watching a Klitschko fight, and we now know what would've happened to Stiverne if he had won last night and then fought Wlad.

Three cheers for Wilder!
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9186
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Controversial »

I was quite impressed with Wilder. I could never really understand the hatred he got but like many I was wondering if he would fall over from the first decent big punch he's hit with. He fought a good fight, didn't rush, good jab and straight right. I would have like to have seen more body punches and uppercuts though. Considering he's very inexperienced he done well. My one concern is he pulled away with his hands down a few times almost inviting a huge hook, they should work on that. He seems very light for his height too, maybe he could add more weight. His chin still not really tested either but he done better than I expected.
Last edited by Controversial on 18 Jan 2015, 11:25, edited 2 times in total.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24717
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Tony1244 »

diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.


Diddy has caught a lot of flak for the above but there are people like that; they do exist in all colors. But of course most Europeans aren't like that.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by diddy »

Cent0089 wrote:
diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
It is similar how black americans hates Wladimir Klitschko :box:
I'm white. Wlad is the man. I think he could hang in any era.

That said if you don't think a lot of the Wilder backlash from euros is divided on racial and country lines you are kidding yourself. Many euros refused to give him any credit when he was wiping dudes out. Refusing to recognize his obvious skills. Bottom line is boxing is like "the baby" to many foreignors. Just like soccer. A rare sport they can hold somewhat over the head of Americans and say "see you don't have all the best athletes". When an American reigns over the most prestigious division in the sport it hurts their soul. You know it's true you just cant admit it. And wont admit it.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by diddy »

Butterbean wrote:
diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
Man in the mirror...
Idiot. Why on earth do you have the idea that europeans, and especially european boxing fans has anything against black fighters ?
You have issues with your self, your selfesteam and your background. Get help, but somewhere else please.
Again, I'm white. And this is a mainly-euro posting board. Perhaps you have missed all the scoffing of Wilder on here, as well as Andre Ward. Open your eyes to the truth, pal.
Last edited by diddy on 18 Jan 2015, 11:32, edited 1 time in total.
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by kidbazooka1 »

diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
Im a wilder fan and believe he will destroy wlad but please dont bring up cuz hes black excuse.

African Americans have pretty much always ruled hw up until recently ofcourse.

Leave that excuse to the real guys that get discriminated in this sport, blacks are NOT one of them.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17431
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Baby Face Finster »

diddy wrote:
Cent0089 wrote:
diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
It is similar how black americans hates Wladimir Klitschko :box:
I'm white. Wlad is the man. I think he could hang in any era.

That said if you don't think a lot of the Wilder backlash from euros is divided on racial and country lines you are kidding yourself. Many euros refused to give him any credit when he was wiping dudes out. Refusing to recognize his obvious skills. Bottom line is boxing is like "the baby" to many foreignors. Just like soccer. A rare sport they can hold somewhat over the head of Americans and say "see you don't have all the best athletes". When an American reigns over the most prestigious division in the sport it hurts their soul. You know it's true you just cant admit it. And wont admit it.
Wilder does not reign over the most prestigious division in the sport, he simply won a belt. The king is Wlad, and until someone dethrones him or he retires, he is who reigns over the most prestigious division in boxing.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by ikorolev »

His over-cautious matching in the first 32 fights definitely contributed to people's doubts. When somebody is fighting punching bags for years, it raises valid questions.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by diddy »

BFF,

Read first post again. I said when Wlad retires.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17431
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by Baby Face Finster »

diddy wrote:BFF,

Read first post again. I said when Wlad retires.
I disagree with you. I don't think Wilder will hold onto his belt too long much less reign over the division once Wlad retires. Time will tell.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by diddy »

Baby Face Finster wrote:
diddy wrote:BFF,

Read first post again. I said when Wlad retires.
I disagree with you. I don't think Wilder will hold onto his belt too long much less reign over the division once Wlad retires. Time will tell.
Ha. Have you seen the heavyweight landscape? Wilder has things that can't be taught. That size, athleticism, jab and power aren't going away any time soon.

Joshua would probably be his toughest opponent down the line when Wlad is gone.
KBB
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2809
Joined: 11 Oct 2014, 23:33

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by KBB »

Congrats to Wilder, I'm not a Wilder hater I just didn't see enough in him against opponents in order to see what he really had in his tank and he showed it last night. I wasn't even sure he could go 12 rounds but he proved me wrong, I'm not ready to throw in all the cards and say that he'll rule the division because you still have Jennings and a few others out there to test him but he does look promising.

We'll just have to see what the rest of his career and future bouts will make him look like.
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by davie »

diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
Sorry mate, I just can't help it.
I think it must have something to do with the fact that there are no black people in Europe that makes our entire continent such intolerant racists.

We really should take a lead from America, they have such a good reputation for treating their black people with respect and fairness.

How did you manage to eradicate racism in your land???
PsychoGamerTwo
Super Welterweight
Posts: 526
Joined: 09 Oct 2014, 18:04

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by PsychoGamerTwo »

Badhusker wrote:
sendo wrote:
diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
You are hilarious, all that s**t talking about how UK fighters overrate their fighters, then come out with this absolute guff about Wilder :D

Stiverne was an average fighter who fought a poor fight, yet Wilder still couldn't put him away.


Stiverne is just an average fighter now? Whatever. I re-watched Stiverne's only other loss, and it was a very controversial stoppage. There are no average fighters that become World Champions. At least give Stiverne props for having a world champion chin.
Wilder gets no credit because he couldn't put Stiverne away? :roll:
Wilder predicted it, if he beats Stiverne he's been a bum. 6 months ago, Stiverne would have knocked him out... now he's a bum.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by diddy »

davie wrote:
diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
Sorry mate, I just can't help it.
I think it must have something to do with the fact that there are no black people in Europe that makes our entire continent such intolerant racists.

We really should take a lead from America, they have such a good reputation for treating their black people with respect and fairness.

How did you manage to eradicate racism in your land???
The president of the United States...is a black man. Have you seen his policies? Apparently not. Apparently it is still 1940 in America according to you. Who knew?
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Deontay Wilder Haters

Post by davie »

diddy wrote:
davie wrote:
diddy wrote:He's a heavyweight and black and american so he can't be any good. Right, idiots?

Friggin thick headed Europeans.

It really chaps their asses that a black american will rule the division when Wlad retires.
Sorry mate, I just can't help it.
I think it must have something to do with the fact that there are no black people in Europe that makes our entire continent such intolerant racists.

We really should take a lead from America, they have such a good reputation for treating their black people with respect and fairness.

How did you manage to eradicate racism in your land???
The president of the United States...is a black man. Have you seen his policies? Apparently not. Apparently it is still 1940 in America according to you. Who knew?


No, it's definitely 2014 and your police still seem hell bent on shooting inordinate numbers of black people. Just because they no longer have to sit in different seats on the bus doesn't mean there's no longer an issue, but that's just the opinion of a dumb European looking in.

Ps can you see no hypocrisy when indiscriminately criticising an entire continent of people and in the same breath talking of racism?
Post Reply