Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in MM2

Post Reply
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in MM2

Post by Chepppaaa »

in the Mayweather - Maidana 2 fight, maidana was never able to do were he is the most effective and thats close, inside boxing. everytime maidana was gettign close you heard "bbbrrreeeeaaakkkkkkk" from bayless.

look at the leo santa cruz fight right now, they brawl, the exchange, the fight up close and all bayless is saying is "punch out" or like in this round 3, they are head to head, up close and bayless says nothing, he lets them box according the rules, because insight boxing is a part of boxing just like boxing from outside.

so why is bayless now like this and was totaly changed in the may-mai 2 fight?

did al haymon talk do bayless. was he giving money too. did floyd talk to bayless?

buttom line is, it is illegal, you cant tell me, "yeah bayless reacts to fights different, in one he is like this, in other fights he is acting another why" no, there is just 1 way to ref fight and thats the right way and when somebody like maidana fight upclose and doesnt do any illigal stuff than you let him have his chance, just like you let floyd his chance ding what he can to win. maidana didnt got his chance, bayless was bought. if i was maidana i would make an protest the fight and althought sure those kind of paymants were made cash money, still.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by tiny_acres »

Chepppaaa wrote:in the Mayweather - Maidana 2 fight, maidana was never able to do were he is the most effective and thats close, inside boxing. everytime maidana was gettign close you heard "bbbrrreeeeaaakkkkkkk" from bayless.

look at the leo santa cruz fight right now, they brawl, the exchange, the fight up close and all bayless is saying is "punch out" or like in this round 3, they are head to head, up close and bayless says nothing, he lets them box according the rules, because insight boxing is a part of boxing just like boxing from outside.

so why is bayless now like this and was totaly changed in the may-mai 2 fight?

did al haymon talk do bayless. was he giving money too. did floyd talk to bayless?

buttom line is, it is illegal, you cant tell me, "yeah bayless reacts to fights different, in one he is like this, in other fights he is acting another why" no, there is just 1 way to ref fight and thats the right way and when somebody like maidana fight upclose and doesnt do any illigal stuff than you let him have his chance, just like you let floyd his chance ding what he can to win. maidana didnt got his chance, bayless was bought. if i was maidana i would make an protest the fight and althought sure those kind of paymants were made cash money, still.
Please tie a pork chop to your neck and play with your neighbor's pitbull :OhYes:
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Chepppaaa »

when you cant make an quality answer, you start talking shi/)t........you learned quick from floyd :lol: when you get a uncomfortable question or statemant, you dont answer reasonable but talk talking nonsense, well done retard
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by tiny_acres »

Chepppaaa wrote:when you cant make an quality answer, you start talking shi/)t........you learned quick from floyd :lol: when you get a uncomfortable question or statemant, you dont answer reasonable but talk talking nonsense, well done retard
You have never once made a quality post.Good job troll :TU:
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Chepppaaa »

tiny_acres wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:when you cant make an quality answer, you start talking shi/)t........you learned quick from floyd :lol: when you get a uncomfortable question or statemant, you dont answer reasonable but talk talking nonsense, well done retard
You have never once made a quality post.Good job troll :TU:

i make always quality posts. just like this one. the leo fight proves that bayless does he ref job different. in one fight he does not allow a guy boxing from inside, in other he lets them fight inside. inside boxing is part of boxing, you dont break it as soon as they come close. that easy. and when you dont, than there is a problem.
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17431
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Baby Face Finster »

tiny_acres wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:in the Mayweather - Maidana 2 fight, maidana was never able to do were he is the most effective and thats close, inside boxing. everytime maidana was gettign close you heard "bbbrrreeeeaaakkkkkkk" from bayless.

look at the leo santa cruz fight right now, they brawl, the exchange, the fight up close and all bayless is saying is "punch out" or like in this round 3, they are head to head, up close and bayless says nothing, he lets them box according the rules, because insight boxing is a part of boxing just like boxing from outside.

so why is bayless now like this and was totaly changed in the may-mai 2 fight?

did al haymon talk do bayless. was he giving money too. did floyd talk to bayless?

buttom line is, it is illegal, you cant tell me, "yeah bayless reacts to fights different, in one he is like this, in other fights he is acting another why" no, there is just 1 way to ref fight and thats the right way and when somebody like maidana fight upclose and doesnt do any illigal stuff than you let him have his chance, just like you let floyd his chance ding what he can to win. maidana didnt got his chance, bayless was bought. if i was maidana i would make an protest the fight and althought sure those kind of paymants were made cash money, still.
Please tie a pork chop to your neck and play with your neighbor's pitbull :OhYes:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
demon1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 63
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 13:27

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by demon1 »

getting paid off is a bit much but yes i thought the same thing that Bayless let them fight out a lot more than Mayweather - MM. He was crazy quick to break them (Money vs MM) out of inside fighting.
I'm more willing to believe that Mayweathers corner plants a seed in his head about dirty inside fighting by MM during the ref instructions.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Chepppaaa »

demon1 wrote:getting paid off is a bit much but yes i thought the same thing that Bayless let them fight out a lot more than Mayweather - MM. He was crazy quick to break them (Money vs MM) out of inside fighting.
I'm more willing to believe that Mayweathers corner plants a seed in his head about dirty inside fighting by MM during the ref instructions.

yeah sounds logic. but still a world class ref like bayless, who had had such an great career as an ref should not buy into that.

he should ref according the rules. if maidana had boxed dirty, than i would have understood him breaking often. but letting maidana no chance to come upclose is just ridcioulus. because i said it a hundred times, maidana is most effective up close. as soon as he came in it was either floyd crabbing and holding (illegal, but yet never a warning) or it was "bbrreeaaakkkkkkkk" yelling from bayless.. total shit job. and to be quiet honest, before that fight, for me bayless was the best ref in the world.
kidbazooka1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 959
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:56

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by kidbazooka1 »

Was there ever any doubt.

Fuuuck Bayless
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Badhusker »

Chepppaaa wrote:
demon1 wrote:getting paid off is a bit much but yes i thought the same thing that Bayless let them fight out a lot more than Mayweather - MM. He was crazy quick to break them (Money vs MM) out of inside fighting.
I'm more willing to believe that Mayweathers corner plants a seed in his head about dirty inside fighting by MM during the ref instructions.

yeah sounds logic. but still a world class ref like bayless, who had had such an great career as an ref should not buy into that.

he should ref according the rules. if maidana had boxed dirty, than i would have understood him breaking often. but letting maidana no chance to come upclose is just ridcioulus. because i said it a hundred times, maidana is most effective up close. as soon as he came in it was either floyd crabbing and holding (illegal, but yet never a warning) or it was "bbrreeaaakkkkkkkk" yelling from bayless.. total poo job. and to be quiet honest, before that fight, for me bayless was the best ref in the world.
The thing is, Maidana HAD boxed dirty in the first fight, and would have done it again if Bayless allowed it. Maidana's dirty tactics were the worst I had seen in many years, and possibly all time. Bayless did break them early and often, and did it purposely because he wanted a clean fight. Maidana's only chance was to get it into a type of fight where he could use illegal tactics like he did in the first.

Please quit whining about Floyd winning a fair fight. You could say he over-did it because Weeks didn't do his job in the first fight.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Chepppaaa »

Badhusker wrote:
Chepppaaa wrote:
demon1 wrote:getting paid off is a bit much but yes i thought the same thing that Bayless let them fight out a lot more than Mayweather - MM. He was crazy quick to break them (Money vs MM) out of inside fighting.
I'm more willing to believe that Mayweathers corner plants a seed in his head about dirty inside fighting by MM during the ref instructions.

yeah sounds logic. but still a world class ref like bayless, who had had such an great career as an ref should not buy into that.

he should ref according the rules. if maidana had boxed dirty, than i would have understood him breaking often. but letting maidana no chance to come upclose is just ridcioulus. because i said it a hundred times, maidana is most effective up close. as soon as he came in it was either floyd crabbing and holding (illegal, but yet never a warning) or it was "bbrreeaaakkkkkkkk" yelling from bayless.. total poo job. and to be quiet honest, before that fight, for me bayless was the best ref in the world.
The thing is, Maidana HAD boxed dirty in the first fight, and would have done it again if Bayless allowed it. Maidana's dirty tactics were the worst I had seen in many years, and possibly all time. Bayless did break them early and often, and did it purposely because he wanted a clean fight. Maidana's only chance was to get it into a type of fight where he could use illegal tactics like he did in the first.

Please quit whining about Floyd winning a fair fight. You could say he over-did it because Weeks didn't do his job in the first fight.

it wasnt a fair fight. when your best weapon is boxing inside and a referee takes that away from you, than it is over. boxing inside and unleashing short hooks to the body or overhand rights to the side of the head is no illegal boxing, it is legal and the ref should have let him do his stuff. if somebody did something illegal, than it was floyd, for excessive holding and crabbing and bayless rarely said something to him about it. and all of the sudden in the leo fight he always says "punch out" instead of "bbreeaaakkkkkk"....
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Badhusker »

he should ref according the rules. if maidana had boxed dirty, than i would have understood him breaking often. but letting maidana no chance to come upclose is just ridcioulus. because i said it a hundred times, maidana is most effective up close. as soon as he came in it was either floyd crabbing and holding (illegal, but yet never a warning) or it was "bbrreeaaakkkkkkkk" yelling from bayless.. total poo job. and to be quiet honest, before that fight, for me bayless was the best ref in the world.[/quote]

The thing is, Maidana HAD boxed dirty in the first fight, and would have done it again if Bayless allowed it. Maidana's dirty tactics were the worst I had seen in many years, and possibly all time. Bayless did break them early and often, and did it purposely because he wanted a clean fight. Maidana's only chance was to get it into a type of fight where he could use illegal tactics like he did in the first.

Please quit whining about Floyd winning a fair fight. You could say he over-did it because Weeks didn't do his job in the first fight.[/quote]


it wasnt a fair fight. when your best weapon is boxing inside and a referee takes that away from you, than it is over. boxing inside and unleashing short hooks to the body or overhand rights to the side of the head is no illegal boxing, it is legal and the ref should have let him do his stuff. if somebody did something illegal, than it was floyd, for excessive holding and crabbing and bayless rarely said something to him about it. and all of the sudden in the leo fight he always says "punch out" instead of "bbreeaaakkkkkk"....[/quote]

Are you saying that Maidana didn't do anything illegal in the first fight?
demon1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 63
Joined: 09 Nov 2008, 13:27

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by demon1 »

Badhusker wrote:Are you saying that Maidana didn't do anything illegal in the first fight?
I would call it rough and ugly but not illegal to the point where it would warrant a break all the time.
Are you saying world class ref Tony Weeks blatantly let MM fight with illegal tactics for 12 rounds straight?
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Badhusker »

demon1 wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Are you saying that Maidana didn't do anything illegal in the first fight?
I would call it rough and ugly but not illegal to the point where it would warrant a break all the time.
Are you saying world class ref Tony Weeks blatantly let MM fight with illegal tactics for 12 rounds straight?
Yes I would. Arm twisting, rabbit punches, tackling, multiple low blows to thighs and groin, head butt. What Maidana was doing was illegal. So yes, Weeks allowed it. Floyd didn't fight totally clean either, I admit that, with his forearm pushing, but what Maidana did was over the top.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Leo fight right now is the proof Bayless got paid-off in

Post by Chepppaaa »

Badhusker wrote:
demon1 wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Are you saying that Maidana didn't do anything illegal in the first fight?
I would call it rough and ugly but not illegal to the point where it would warrant a break all the time.
Are you saying world class ref Tony Weeks blatantly let MM fight with illegal tactics for 12 rounds straight?
Yes I would. Arm twisting, rabbit punches, tackling, multiple low blows to thighs and groin, head butt. What Maidana was doing was illegal. So yes, Weeks allowed it. Floyd didn't fight totally clean either, I admit that, with his forearm pushing, but what Maidana did was over the top.
if a boxer does some illegal stuff, you know what the ref has to do? warn, warn a second time, deduct a point and than dq. that easy. but you dont break all the time, to the advantage of the fighter, who prefers to box from outside (mayeather) and give the boxer who like to box from inside a big disadvantage. that is simply not correct. maidana fought rough and it was not illegal tactic, neither was floyd illegal in the first fight, sometimes he holded, or wrestled a litle bit, or worked with the elbow, but both fighter never went to a point, were you could say that they are fighting illegal. floyd is just a straight out puss&y who wants every advantage on his side, even going this war to truly doing some criminal stuff and this is paying out bayless to ref like the way he did. and if he didnt than shame on bayless for being so influenced by al haymon, who pretty much told him, dont let maidana box from inside, because he is dirty. this is boxing, not pillow fighting.
Post Reply