Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Sklar »

What do people think of this match-up? It looks okay to me, Hammer is obviously another relatively short opponent and isn't a high level banger but for a marking time fight it'll do. Agree?
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by JimJim2009 »

I think it's a gift for fury. Hammer would be a gift for most decent heavyweights, I'd take price and Joshua to stop him. He lost to bidenko, and wach stopped him. Very clever match making and ultimately an easy nights work for Tyson.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by rio »

Crap fight, furys wins anytime he feels like it.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by mullenman »

Decent fight
hammer is wbo number four so very creditable opponent
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Rexob »

It's going to be a complete an utter wipe out, with a few wobbles along the way.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Tuan_Jim »

mullenman wrote:Decent fight
hammer is wbo number four so very creditable opponent
Surely sarcasm?

Since when did a WBO ranking mean credibility? Hammer is awful.
sammy95
Middleweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 16:18

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by sammy95 »

Fury wins comfortably, but Hammer wont roll over having not lost in 4 years.

Fury has had 3 of his last 4 fights cancelled or postponed and needs to get out regularly before he fights for a world title. Fighting guys like this is perfect for what he needs, rounds against credible and ranked opponents.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Andrew »

This fight is fine.

Tyson is WBO mandatory and has been very in active over the past couple of years.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by crusader »

I think Hammer is tailor-made for Fury, but I don't have a problem with it considering that Fury is Wlad's mandatory and could've just sat on a title shot.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by lillywhite14 »

Airich took Hammer the distance, just about says it all regarding how dangerous he is for Fury.

Weakest 'decent' option available I reckon. Keeps Tyson busy though so better than not fighting at all
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by pyenest77 »

Dont rate hammer in the slightest. Fury will toy with him then take him out any time he likes.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by ScottDetonator »

I wouldn't be so hard on Hammer, I'd rate him as, having a bit of something....

A Fury win though but another fight I wouldn't back against going the distance.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Christian Hammer is USA Network journeyman heavyweight cannon fodder in the 1990s.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by ILikeBeer »

IT'S HAMMER TIME!!!!

Sorry, couldn't resist.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by whiskey »

Given Tyson Fury is a devout man of god...

..this opponent has a great name if he wins.

But you will have more chance of hell freezing over.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by ILikeBeer »

G0mez wrote:Given Tyson Fury is a devout man of god...

..this opponent has a great name if he wins.

But you will have more chance of hell freezing over.
Now you mention it, his name does make you think that he'll administer the wrath of God, doesn't it? :lol:
Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Baboon »

Great name.....not so great fight. I guess it serves a purpose in keeping Fury active and Hammer isn't terrible, but it doesn't exactly help in preparation for Klitschko or Wilder....in fairness though finding an opp to perform that role is pretty difficult. Would prefer to see Fury fighting guys with more height in prep though.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Crease »

Hammer is currently ranked 11th in the world, with that ranking you'd have to rate him as a top contender.

Still fancy a Fury victory.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Gonna get hammered
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by black panther »

Decent enough marking time fight IMO. Fury just need activity after all the BS he's been through. I think we'll see the best of him if he remains active. I'd like to see him at least 15lbs lighter than the Chisora fight.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Hammer will at least turn up and Tyson will bank some rounds and get some much needed-activity.....but with Wilder potentially around the next corner I'd much prefer Tyson to be facing another genuinely tall lad rather than a relatively short, chunky East European warhorse. If some target practice is in order then pick a rangy, tall lad with a bit of reach to negotiate and get used to punching straight rather than down? But Peter F knows his business and Tyson spars with his tall cousins....so perhaps not such a big deal and Hammer will give it a whirl without being dangerous.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1719
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by Shirow »

No interest for me but as has been said he needs activity. Just going through another training camp will be more significant than the fight. He has seemed to improve in the past in between fights despite crap opponents so it's positive for his career and bank account.

I won't help fund it however.
david1963
Super Welterweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 24 Jan 2015, 01:44

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by david1963 »

I expect this to go the same way as Fury's second fight with Chisora. The top tall heavyweights all seemed to have figured out how to beat dangerous shorter opponents, and Fury is better at keeping those kind of boxers at bay than most.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6654
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by THEBUTCH »

Hamer gave it a good go against the huge Wach before getting nailed.

I'm looking forward to this fight, should be entertaining, and great to see Fury getting the momentum back.

Why is Fury not defending his EBU title against Hamer?
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3189
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts

Post by deadpan »

Fury won't be in the best shape and will not respect Hammer's power and accordingly may well make another of his early rounds canvas visits before forcing a possibly early ref stoppage in 5.
Post Reply