Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
For me its another example of the clever booking of Fury's career, he'll get another easy win & be totally unprepared for the step up in class when he gets in there with Wlad & gets destroyed.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Clever in one sense ( he's already landed a mandatory title shot and has earned decent money and will get the payday that comes with the title shot ) but stupid in another ( as you say, leaves him totally unprepared for someone like Wlad )moogie101 wrote:For me its another example of the clever booking of Fury's career, he'll get another easy win & be totally unprepared for the step up in class when he gets in there with Wlad & gets destroyed.
Looking through his record it's clear as day that he has been kept away from anyone deemed to have even decent power. I hope that's just a cocincidence!
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Course it's not.lillywhite14 wrote:
Clever in one sense ( he's already landed a mandatory title shot and has earned decent money and will get the payday that comes with the title shot ) but stupid in another ( as you say, leaves him totally unprepared for someone like Wlad )
Looking through his record it's clear as day that he has been kept away from anyone deemed to have even decent power. I hope that's just a cocincidence!
He got knocked over by Steve Cunningham, ffs. He's gonna get his head knocked off if he fights somebody of a similar height, or who can bang.
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Cos Erkan Teper (guy who kayoed Sprott and Rogan in 1rnd) has been made mandatory for EBU.Expect Fury to vacate in the next few weeksTHEBUTCH wrote:Why is Fury not defending his EBU title against Hamer?
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.
Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Gawd. Imagine if we had a fast six footer under 18 stone with long reach who could bob and weave under a jab and punch with major authority. He'd put an end to all these awkward giants. Unfortunately, it looks like lumbering giants from here on.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23181
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Is Haye not classed as a puncher now?Tuan_Jim wrote:When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.
Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Filler in fight.
Active always help you, other than that out here no one cares.
I like Fury the man ... he's mad funny for me culturally.
Sometimes Fury is rude and obscene which he needs to get a handle on the global audience, but from geezer to geezer I get his humour.
Active always help you, other than that out here no one cares.
I like Fury the man ... he's mad funny for me culturally.
Sometimes Fury is rude and obscene which he needs to get a handle on the global audience, but from geezer to geezer I get his humour.
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
There are a couple of million reasons why that's different. They've taken the path of least resistance with Tyson and got him where they have. I understand why the purists complain about soft matchmaking but if they'd thrown him in with bangers would he be on the cusp of a title shot and the huge payday that goes with it?mickey1975 wrote:Is Haye not classed as a puncher now?Tuan_Jim wrote:When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.
Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23181
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
Possibly, yes. He's got up to stop whoever put him down. Who are these huge bangers he should have been put in with? Please don't say Price because Fury's chin and heart are infinitely better than his. Price would lose that fight at the press conference.Sklar wrote:There are a couple of million reasons why that's different. They've taken the path of least resistance with Tyson and got him where they have. I understand why the purists complain about soft matchmaking but if they'd thrown him in with bangers would he be on the cusp of a title shot and the huge payday that goes with it?mickey1975 wrote:Is Haye not classed as a puncher now?Tuan_Jim wrote:When punchers come, Fury vacates. God knows how he would react to being hit on the chin by Wlad or Wilder.
Fury vs Chagaev for the WBA's illustrious 33.99999% partial ordinary lower super heavyweight championship of the world, anyone?
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury v Hammer Thoughts
There's a reason why he pulled out of the Price fight when it was ordered. Too much risk, not enough reward. The risk being getting knocked spark out. Can't blame him for that. Since then Price has been exposed to a degree ( plenty of us already knew his chin was weak ) but even now, when Fury would be a big favourite, it wouldn't happen ( he's not on the same level etc...oh and Hammer is? )
As mentioned above, it's savvy to only entertain a 'banger' when it's financially rewarding. Still doesn't ignore the fact they have yet to eye up a fight with a 'puncher'. I'm hoping it's a coincidence but it's unlikely to be. Tyson himself would fight anybody, of that I have no doubt. His team are a little 'safer' though.
As mentioned above, it's savvy to only entertain a 'banger' when it's financially rewarding. Still doesn't ignore the fact they have yet to eye up a fight with a 'puncher'. I'm hoping it's a coincidence but it's unlikely to be. Tyson himself would fight anybody, of that I have no doubt. His team are a little 'safer' though.