Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

punchdrunkgench
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 22 Feb 2010, 08:20

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by punchdrunkgench »

handsofstone wrote:I'm no sleuth but I have a sneaky feeling Sky might be trying to set up a clash between Campbell and Coyle
Whatever gave u that idea
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12070
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Taansend »

expe wrote:
skanksta wrote:Let's be fair to Coyle - big balls, GSOH, exciting tryer.

Campbell will matador him for a while before taking him out clinically a la Zolani Tete vs Butler.
Sounds like a dating ad.
Fantastic.
MR T
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 09:06

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by MR T »

punchdrunkgench wrote:That interview just put me right off coyle he was so trying sell the Campbell fight it became painful to watch
For Coyle its a cash out, its the only real money fight for him as he's probably not above British Level so can see why he is doing it. For campbell its a lot of money for an easy fight.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Stuarty »

I can't wait til Campbell disposes of Coyle and his 'coconut' balls
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by skanksta »

expe wrote:
skanksta wrote:Let's be fair to Coyle - big balls, GSOH, exciting tryer.

Campbell will matador him for a while before taking him out clinically a la Zolani Tete vs Butler.
Sounds like a dating ad.

My man-crush - busted !

:roll: :oops: :roll:
MR T
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 09:06

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by MR T »

handsofstone wrote:I'm no sleuth but I have a sneaky feeling Sky might be trying to set up a clash between Campbell and Coyle
:OhYes: :OhYes: :OhYes:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by handsofstone »

Coyle done well to box himself back into that fight but its clear it was more to do with Gethin's non existent workrate

BTW Tommy doing a good job of selling the good guy/bad guy angle
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Horse »

handsofstone wrote:Coyle done well to box himself back into that fight but its clear it was more to do with Gethin's non existent workrate

BTW Tommy doing a good job of selling the good guy/bad guy angle
Who's the good guy?
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by skanksta »

Alex Arthur won't be invited back on Sky - "I can't even pretend it will be a competitive fight"

Shhh !
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by expe »

skanksta wrote:Alex Arthur won't be invited back on Sky - "I can't even pretend it will be a competitive fight"

Shhh !
McCrory's gone rogue recently too, been telling it like it is.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Horse »

How long are they going to talk about this fight?
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by skanksta »

Good for McCrory - depressing how often a "real 50/50 fight" is 1/20 8/1 @ the bookies

:witzend:
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Boxing Prospect »

"It's talk about a lot in Hull"...is there really nothing going on in Hull recently?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I admire Coyles heart but I kinda can't stand him a bit! I try my best to like every Brit guy but I'm finding it hard with Coyle!
I prefer him to Campbell.
I don't see how to be honest but it takes all types to make a world! Campbell is respectful and humble where Coyle just engages his mouth before consulting his brain. I think he's good to watch but nowhere near the level of Luke Campbell.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:I don't see how to be honest but it takes all types to make a world! Campbell is respectful and humble where Coyle just engages his mouth before consulting his brain. I think he's good to watch but nowhere near the level of Luke Campbell.
Campbell seems like a bit of a git. Something about him winds me up, at least Coyle is entertaining in the ring.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by ScottDetonator »

Boxing Prospect wrote:"It's talk about a lot in Hull"...is there really nothing going on in Hull recently?
"Have you heard the news? About that lad that won a gold medal at the Olympics? He's going to be facing a below domestic level lad from up the road in a boxing match! Going to sell 20 thousand tickets so they say, be pay-per-view on sky sports because the fight can only happen that way and make us all proud to be Hullian's in the process!"

Dream on Eddie.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Horse »

Were people more interested in Coyle vs Campbell before the big hype train got going for this fight?

Hearn might have damaged this fight with his irritating antics trying to force this fight down everyone's throat.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by ScottDetonator »

If Gethin had gone down in the same manner as Coyle did tonight, who else thinks the ref would've stopped it? Coyle is a good watch but very poor overall.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Horse »

ScottDetonator wrote:If Gethin had gone down in the same manner as Coyle did tonight, who else thinks the ref would've stopped it? Coyle is a good watch but very poor overall.
Coyle's not very poor, he's a decent contender at British title level.

He's overhyped by Sky, but he's got some ability.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by ScottDetonator »

Horse wrote:
ScottDetonator wrote:If Gethin had gone down in the same manner as Coyle did tonight, who else thinks the ref would've stopped it? Coyle is a good watch but very poor overall.
Coyle's not very poor, he's a decent contender at British title level.

He's overhyped by Sky, but he's got some ability.
In the context of a PPV fighter, he is very poor. That is my point. Coyle v Campbell is a one sided fight.

He has got some ability though - mainly the ability to hit the canvas like a sack of spuds against any domestic level opposition...
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by milpool »

Sat in the Indian after being at the Hull Arena. We're all a bit deflated with the Tommy Coyle fight. It just all ended a bit too sudden.

I also have a confession to make...got my picture taken with Eddie.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Horse »

milpool wrote:I also have a confession to make...got my picture taken with Eddie.
Shame on you.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by ScottDetonator »

Horse wrote:
milpool wrote:I also have a confession to make...got my picture taken with Eddie.
Shame on you.
Did he charge you £60?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32993
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by Boxerbeetle »

rossij8 wrote:
handsofstone wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Watt had that spot on

4 rounds a piece, with the KD's being the difference

Anyone disagree?
Not me
If there was only one KD Ochieng would have lost?
I'd be interested to know the stats of how many 'draws' have taken place on Matchroom cards over the last couple of years. Seems to be the default result whenever the house fighter has clearly lost on points.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Hull bill discussion thread 7th March 2015

Post by ElJefe »

Campbell vs Coyle should have happened last summer, Luke would have won every round then and he'd do it even more clearly now. Hearn is wasting Luke's time. Letting Campbell box Brizuela's ears off was a shocking decision, showed that he's levels above Coyle.

The only reason the fight is happening in the first place is because Hearn wants to make a few quid out of Coyle. Campbell doesn't need him at all.
Post Reply