Would this fight be on
Would this fight be on
Is manny pacquaio playing cat and mouse,, I have no doubt that pacquaio could have finished algieri off if he wanted, the same goes for Bradley but why didn't he, has this got to do with mayweathers perception of pacquaio, would this fight be happening if pacquaio had stopped both of those opponents, is this fight happening now due to mayweather thinking pacquaio has slipped enough to be a safe fight for him, there has been so many conflicting statements coming from pacquaios team, super confident, a very hard fight, not as hard as cotto, de la Hoya or margarito, I think roach and pacquaio both realised long ago that floyd wouldn't fight until he was very confident of winning, has this fight been engineered by a very crafty team over a number of years, lureing floyd into the fight with a much more dangerous opponent than he actually realises, I have a funny feeling the answer is yes
Re: Would this fight be on
You should get that funny feeling seen to.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Would this fight be on
Yeah Pacquiao got knocked on by Marquez on purpose just so he could get Mayweather in the ringPureist wrote:Is manny pacquaio playing cat and mouse,, I have no doubt that pacquaio could have finished algieri off if he wanted, the same goes for Bradley but why didn't he, has this got to do with mayweathers perception of pacquaio, would this fight be happening if pacquaio had stopped both of those opponents, is this fight happening now due to mayweather thinking pacquaio has slipped enough to be a safe fight for him, there has been so many conflicting statements coming from pacquaios team, super confident, a very hard fight, not as hard as cotto, de la Hoya or margarito, I think roach and pacquaio both realised long ago that floyd wouldn't fight until he was very confident of winning, has this fight been engineered by a very crafty team over a number of years, lureing floyd into the fight with a much more dangerous opponent than he actually realises, I have a funny feeling the answer is yes
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: Would this fight be on
The master plan to get Floyd in the ring:

Don't KO your last 9 opponents going back to 2009
Yea seems legit
I think OP has been watching too much pro wrestling.
Maybe just maybe Manny is simply a human whos aged like we all do.

Don't KO your last 9 opponents going back to 2009
Yea seems legit
I think OP has been watching too much pro wrestling.
Maybe just maybe Manny is simply a human whos aged like we all do.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Would this fight be on
It does not make sense to you because you forgot to put on yourReggieDiggs wrote:The master plan to get Floyd in the ring:
Don't KO your last 9 opponents going back to 2009
Yea seems legit![]()
I think OP has been watching too much pro wrestling.
Maybe just maybe Manny is simply a human whos aged like we all do.
aluminum foil hat and where your official Illuminati ring.
Some of these people are nuttier than a squirrel turd if they truly believe it.
Re: Would this fight be on
I know you guys have a hard time looking past floyds nutbag, but try thinking for once, the Ko would have had roach looking for the biggest payday for pacquaio possible, mayweather, mayweather himself said in an interview regarding fighting pacquaio that his health was more important, so how do you make the fight happen, you make mayweather think he has slipped substantially, where else would he get a payday like this like all you nuthuggers keep reminding everyone about, not to hard to understand if you actually think about it, if floyd does get battered, what will the nuthuggers say, floyd has a lot more to lose than pacquaio
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Would this fight be on
You sir are totally insane.Pureist wrote:I know you guys have a hard time looking past floyds nutbag, but try thinking for once, the Ko would have had roach looking for the biggest payday for pacquaio possible, mayweather, mayweather himself said in an interview regarding fighting pacquaio that his health was more important, so how do you make the fight happen, you make mayweather think he has slipped substantially, where else would he get a payday like this like all you nuthuggers keep reminding everyone about, not to hard to understand if you actually think about it, if floyd does get battered, what will the nuthuggers say, floyd has a lot more to lose than pacquaio
Seek professional help.It may save your life.
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: Would this fight be on
So Manny is so good he is incapable of declining in skill at 36 years old & 60+ fights? It has to be him faking like he's declining in skill?Pureist wrote:I know you guys have a hard time looking past floyds nutbag, but try thinking for once, the Ko would have had roach looking for the biggest payday for pacquaio possible, mayweather, mayweather himself said in an interview regarding fighting pacquaio that his health was more important, so how do you make the fight happen, you make mayweather think he has slipped substantially, where else would he get a payday like this like all you nuthuggers keep reminding everyone about, not to hard to understand if you actually think about it, if floyd does get battered, what will the nuthuggers say, floyd has a lot more to lose than pacquaio
Re: Would this fight be on
Do you think he could have stopped algieri and Bradley, he boxes better now, he played with them
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: Would this fight be on
So Manny is so good he is incapable of declining in skill at 36 years old & 60+ fights? It has to be him faking like he's declining in skill?Pureist wrote:Do you think he could have stopped algieri and Bradley, he boxes better now, he played with them
Didn't answer the question.
And no I don't think he coulda KO'd them. Mainly I think he's lost that killer instinct he used to have. Idk if its the religion stuff or making millions upon millions of dollars, but I doubt either is conducive to ones killer instinct. I also think like Floyd his skills have diminished. Neither guy is the same guy we've seen even just 3 or so years ago.
Re: Would this fight be on
Reflexes and footwork on both yes, your taking a lack of killer instinct from those fights and that's exactly what I'm saying, if pacquaio had of stopped them this fight would never have been made, for arguement sake, if pacquaio wins, what will be your reasoning?
-
ReggieDiggs
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3126
- Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37
Re: Would this fight be on
I don't think you can turn on & off your killer instinct. And if you can than I'd say you've still definitely lost something cuz they do call it a killer INSTINCT. Its not something you consciously decide to do or not do. Manny had that. He doesn't anymore. Can't blame him for losing it. When you're getting millions of dollars it can't be an easy thing to keep plugged in with that level of automatic aggression.Pureist wrote:Reflexes and footwork on both yes, your taking a lack of killer instinct from those fights and that's exactly what I'm saying, if pacquaio had of stopped them this fight would never have been made, for arguement sake, if pacquaio wins, what will be your reasoning?
If Manny wins it'll be on volume of punches imho. Manny throws a ton of punches. Floyd pot shots & keeps the action slow. When he's had his toughest fights its been vs volume punchers who keep it close. I could see Manny taking rounds &/or hijacking closer rounds off of his superior volume.
Re: Would this fight be on
In fact it is the exact reverse. You Floyd s haters are so piss to have nothing to bite on that you invade boxing forum to fabulate about how this fight is fix, how Manny is faking, how is going the cherry picking..Pureist wrote:I know you guys have a hard time looking past floyds nutbag, but try thinking for once, the Ko would have had roach looking for the biggest payday for pacquaio possible, mayweather, mayweather himself said in an interview regarding fighting pacquaio that his health was more important, so how do you make the fight happen, you make mayweather think he has slipped substantially, where else would he get a payday like this like all you nuthuggers keep reminding everyone about, not to hard to understand if you actually think about it, if floyd does get battered, what will the nuthuggers say, floyd has a lot more to lose than pacquaio
Great stuff guys, by the time now we all know you don't like the guy and you ll never have a fair thought about him. It s all good you can go on with your life.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Would this fight be on
My argument if Pacquiao wins?Pureist wrote:Reflexes and footwork on both yes, your taking a lack of killer instinct from those fights and that's exactly what I'm saying, if pacquaio had of stopped them this fight would never have been made, for arguement sake, if pacquaio wins, what will be your reasoning?
He was the better man that night. Same argument I would make if Floyd wins.
Re: Would this fight be on
Do folks forget how halfway thru the rematch, Bradley and Pac were dead even and at times it looked like Tim was going to stop Manny?
If feather-fisted Tim doesn't gas-out, things may have been REALLY interesting.
I will say it again...folks are going to be shocked how much of this fight takes place in the middle of the ring or with Manny on his back foot.
If feather-fisted Tim doesn't gas-out, things may have been REALLY interesting.
I will say it again...folks are going to be shocked how much of this fight takes place in the middle of the ring or with Manny on his back foot.
Re: Would this fight be on
Who said I'm a Floyd hater to start with, I've put a notion forward that pacquaio has been idling on purpose for the last 2 fights to make this fight happen, no one answered the first question asked, would this fight be happening if he stopped those 2 opponents, why would roach bring up declining testosterone amongst other things, doesn't it sound odd coming from a trainer as experienced as roach, don't you think pacquaio would have had blood tests to check his levels, don't you think roach would know exactly what those levels were, do you think he'd tell the truth to the media, really I'm a fan of both, Floyd, exceptional skills, pacquaio, freakishly fast with both feet and hands, but you nuthuggers really have blinkers on, if you were in pacquaio a position, knowing how much money could be made from this fight and all you had to do was win but not too well against a couple of opponents, what would you do, killer instinct can be easily controlled for the sake of 150 million I thinkCloutov wrote:In fact it is the exact reverse. You Floyd s haters are so piss to have nothing to bite on that you invade boxing forum to fabulate about how this fight is fix, how Manny is faking, how is going the cherry picking..Pureist wrote:I know you guys have a hard time looking past floyds nutbag, but try thinking for once, the Ko would have had roach looking for the biggest payday for pacquaio possible, mayweather, mayweather himself said in an interview regarding fighting pacquaio that his health was more important, so how do you make the fight happen, you make mayweather think he has slipped substantially, where else would he get a payday like this like all you nuthuggers keep reminding everyone about, not to hard to understand if you actually think about it, if floyd does get battered, what will the nuthuggers say, floyd has a lot more to lose than pacquaio
Great stuff guys, by the time now we all know you don't like the guy and you ll never have a fair thought about him. It s all good you can go on with your life.
Re: Would this fight be on
I LOL to all the ASS-umptions you made in your totally biased statement but to answer them for entertainment sakes then I'll address each separately:Pureist wrote:Is manny pacquaio playing cat and mouse,, I have no doubt that pacquaio could have 1. finished algieri off if he wanted, the same goes for Bradley but why didn't he, has this got to do with 2. mayweathers perception of pacquaio, would this fight be happening if pacquaio had stopped both of those opponents, 3. is this fight happening now due to mayweather thinking pacquaio has slipped enough to be a safe fight for him, there has been so many conflicting statements coming from pacquaios team, super confident, a very hard fight, not as hard as cotto, de la Hoya or margarito, I think roach and pacquaio both realised long ago that floyd wouldn't fight until he was very confident of winning, has this fight been engineered by a very crafty team over a number of years, lureing floyd into the fight with a much more dangerous opponent than he actually realises, I have a funny feeling the answer is yes
1. I'm not sure what makes you so sure he wasn't trying to finish him off, it sure looked that way to all of us and let's just do what you did and disregard the fact that Manny hasn't had a KO in a longer time since Floyd.
2. What perception is that? Are you again Ass-uming that Mayweather even has a perception of Pacquiao? I guess it couldn't even be possible that Floyd has carried his own thought (not what you've posted here) that he could or would beat any version of Pacquiao regardless of what has happened to him or not.
3. This has to be the worst of your ridiculously biased and false claims, we all know that Manny ducked this bout back in 2010 crying about needles and having blood drawn but for you to come here and make it seem as though Mayweather avoided him and that's why we didn't have the fight sooner is evident that you don't know what really happened or you ignore the truth just as the rest of Pacquiao's fans do.
Re: Would this fight be on
3 So if mayweather didn't like something in a contract would he sign it, NO, but you see nothing wrong with that because it's floyd, obviously you think the rules should be different for pacquaio, I don't think so. 2 you are such a nut hugger that you can't see any possible way pacquaio can win, as I said, you nuthuggers have blinkers on 1 if you can't see he was idling, well I can't help you with that. I see you stayed away from the testosterone comments, couldn't think of an answer why roach bought that up I guessKBB wrote:I LOL to all the ASS-umptions you made in your totally biased statement but to answer them for entertainment sakes then I'll address each separately:Pureist wrote:Is manny pacquaio playing cat and mouse,, I have no doubt that pacquaio could have 1. finished algieri off if he wanted, the same goes for Bradley but why didn't he, has this got to do with 2. mayweathers perception of pacquaio, would this fight be happening if pacquaio had stopped both of those opponents, 3. is this fight happening now due to mayweather thinking pacquaio has slipped enough to be a safe fight for him, there has been so many conflicting statements coming from pacquaios team, super confident, a very hard fight, not as hard as cotto, de la Hoya or margarito, I think roach and pacquaio both realised long ago that floyd wouldn't fight until he was very confident of winning, has this fight been engineered by a very crafty team over a number of years, lureing floyd into the fight with a much more dangerous opponent than he actually realises, I have a funny feeling the answer is yes
1. I'm not sure what makes you so sure he wasn't trying to finish him off, it sure looked that way to all of us and let's just do what you did and disregard the fact that Manny hasn't had a KO in a longer time since Floyd.
2. What perception is that? Are you again Ass-uming that Mayweather even has a perception of Pacquiao? I guess it couldn't even be possible that Floyd has carried his own thought (not what you've posted here) that he could or would beat any version of Pacquiao regardless of what has happened to him or not.![]()
3. This has to be the worst of your ridiculously biased and false claims, we all know that Manny ducked this bout back in 2010 crying about needles and having blood drawn but for you to come here and make it seem as though Mayweather avoided him and that's why we didn't have the fight sooner is evident that you don't know what really happened or you ignore the truth just as the rest of Pacquiao's fans do.
Re: Would this fight be on
Pureist wrote:3 So if mayweather didn't like something in a contract would he sign it, NO, but you see nothing wrong with that because it's floyd, obviously you think the rules should be different for pacquaio, I don't think so. 2 you are such a nut hugger that you can't see any possible way pacquaio can win, as I said, you nuthuggers have blinkers on 1 if you can't see he was idling, well I can't help you with that. I see you stayed away from the testosterone comments, couldn't think of an answer why roach bought that up I guessKBB wrote:I LOL to all the ASS-umptions you made in your totally biased statement but to answer them for entertainment sakes then I'll address each separately:Pureist wrote:Is manny pacquaio playing cat and mouse,, I have no doubt that pacquaio could have 1. finished algieri off if he wanted, the same goes for Bradley but why didn't he, has this got to do with 2. mayweathers perception of pacquaio, would this fight be happening if pacquaio had stopped both of those opponents, 3. is this fight happening now due to mayweather thinking pacquaio has slipped enough to be a safe fight for him, there has been so many conflicting statements coming from pacquaios team, super confident, a very hard fight, not as hard as cotto, de la Hoya or margarito, I think roach and pacquaio both realised long ago that floyd wouldn't fight until he was very confident of winning, has this fight been engineered by a very crafty team over a number of years, lureing floyd into the fight with a much more dangerous opponent than he actually realises, I have a funny feeling the answer is yes
1. I'm not sure what makes you so sure he wasn't trying to finish him off, it sure looked that way to all of us and let's just do what you did and disregard the fact that Manny hasn't had a KO in a longer time since Floyd.
2. What perception is that? Are you again Ass-uming that Mayweather even has a perception of Pacquiao? I guess it couldn't even be possible that Floyd has carried his own thought (not what you've posted here) that he could or would beat any version of Pacquiao regardless of what has happened to him or not.![]()
3. This has to be the worst of your ridiculously biased and false claims, we all know that Manny ducked this bout back in 2010 crying about needles and having blood drawn but for you to come here and make it seem as though Mayweather avoided him and that's why we didn't have the fight sooner is evident that you don't know what really happened or you ignore the truth just as the rest of Pacquiao's fans do.
1. Idling for what?? No I can't see, will you help me take the blinders off??
2. I do see a way for Pacquiao to win, if he lands a one punch KO then he will be able to win, otherwise he will not outbox, outwork or outsmart Floyd.
3. Mayweather did sign the contract they had, I'm sure he didn't like that proposed penalty that Manny had in the original contract back in 2010 that stated he (Money) would have to pay a penalty of 10 million for every pound over the limit. Not only that, he agreed to everything else that Pacquiao demanded but then he asked for only one thing (random testing) and what happened???
Maybe you are the one who is the nuthugger if you are too afraid to admit the truth, as far as what Freddie stated about testosterone then please enlighten me because I did not see what he said.
Re: Would this fight be on
So now I know your level of boxing knowledge, Floyd will outwork pacquaio, that's one of the funniest thinks I've ever heard, floyd has a terrible work rate, king nuthugger, no one even comes close to you, if I see a pair of shoelaces hanging out of floyds arse I now know who owns them, outwork, what a laugh
