Looking back at the Super Eight

Post Reply
Cloutov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 10:21

Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by Cloutov »

Poor Andre Ward, even if the tourney bring him to the P4P status, he should wished it never happen. I think the tournament was bad and the reason is quite simple. It clean out the division for 5 years and maybe more. At the time we where talking about the deepest division and now we have a clear no 1 who rules on a division where the no 2 guy is fighting because we all know no body can beat no 1. Now Andre will be force to go at light heavy to make money.
Looking On
Super Middleweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by Looking On »

OP, name all the boxers who competed, then youll see your first mistake.

Although yeah the general idea of what your saying makes sense...
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4091
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by black panther »

Looking On wrote:OP, name all the boxers who competed, then youll see your first mistake.

Although yeah the general idea of what your saying makes sense...

Mikkel Kessler
Carl Froch
Arthur Abraham
Andre Dirrell
Andre Ward
Jermain Taylor
Sakio Bika
Glencoffee Johnson

:D
ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by ReggieDiggs »

Thats one of the underappreciated negative byproducts with boxing tournaments at the elite level. I can only think of two bigger top tier tournaments (more than 4 boxers) & thats the Super Six & the HBO HW tournament in the 80's (edit: actually I think there was another tournament back when Ali lost his title too iirc). With these type of tournaments you crown "the champion" obviously. You also create a new top ten that is filled with guys the champion has already beaten or guys who are getting pushing to the front of the line quicker.

I enjoy bigger tournaments at the lower levels more then the higher levels for these reasons.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by Chepppaaa »

so much crap just in 1 post :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:
Looking On
Super Middleweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 12 Oct 2012, 13:50

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by Looking On »

black panther wrote:
Looking On wrote:OP, name all the boxers who competed, then youll see your first mistake.

Although yeah the general idea of what your saying makes sense...

Mikkel Kessler
Carl Froch
Arthur Abraham
Andre Dirrell
Andre Ward
Jermain Taylor
Sakio Bika
Glencoffee Johnson

:D
:lol: fair enough, but you understood what i meant , Bika and Johnson were additions.
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by CheckHook »

Ward could've gone straight in after the tournament against the recognised #2 in the division, in Bute, but decided to let Froch have that fight. If he was active he could've found opponents and build up a bunch of title defences and raised his profile. There are lots of ways Ward could've capitalised on his tournament victory, but for whatever reason, didn't. Lets not forget Froch lost that fight and seemed to go on and build a decent career for himself. It was a great tournament and great platform to build from. Right now there are plenty of challengers out there, most of which are likely to be squaring off against each other this year (Both Dirrells vs Degale/ Groves). Oh, and really, if there are no fights out there for you, moving up 7lb to find quality opposition shouldn't really be considered all that much of a monumental task.
Cloutov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 10:21

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by Cloutov »

And i obviously count the added guys!!
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23088
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by handsofstone »

Looking On wrote:
black panther wrote:
Looking On wrote:OP, name all the boxers who competed, then youll see your first mistake.

Although yeah the general idea of what your saying makes sense...

Mikkel Kessler
Carl Froch
Arthur Abraham
Andre Dirrell
Andre Ward
Jermain Taylor
Sakio Bika
Glencoffee Johnson

:D
:lol: fair enough, but you understood what i meant , Bika and Johnson were additions.
As was Allan Green :DDD
Cloutov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 10:21

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by Cloutov »

Ya maybe he could but the way he went threw the tourney put an en on what is the main attraction in boxing. Can he lost the fight and nobody in the top 10 SMW would of make him lost. So what s the point?
Last edited by Cloutov on 24 Mar 2015, 14:54, edited 1 time in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Looking back at the Super Eight

Post by crusader »

CheckHook wrote:Ward could've gone straight in after the tournament against the recognised #2 in the division, in Bute, but decided to let Froch have that fight. If he was active he could've found opponents and build up a bunch of title defences and raised his profile. There are lots of ways Ward could've capitalised on his tournament victory, but for whatever reason, didn't. Lets not forget Froch lost that fight and seemed to go on and build a decent career for himself. It was a great tournament and great platform to build from. Right now there are plenty of challengers out there, most of which are likely to be squaring off against each other this year (Both Dirrells vs Degale/ Groves). Oh, and really, if there are no fights out there for you, moving up 7lb to find quality opposition shouldn't really be considered all that much of a monumental task.
I agree.
Post Reply