askin v mckenzie

rubberneck · Post by **rubberneck** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:33

handsofstone wrote:Anyone watching this card?

Romeo Romaeo stopped Michael Mooney in the 5th,Romao was exact same as I've seen him in every other fight,inaccurate bursts and taking far too much in return

Cracking stoppage though,Romaeo caught Mooney with a peach of a right hook out of nowhere which sent Michael staggering back against the ropes where the ref stepped in with the follow up flurry from Romeo

Cracking right hook

That's a good result. Mooney comes to win, is fit and hard as nails. Picked up a few upset wins on his travels.

handsofstone · Post by **handsofstone** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:45

Corcoran wins 78-76,he might be predictable and one dimentional and he's not a massive puncher but he's strong as an ox and doesn't stop throwing or take a backward step,respect to Jones, he's a tough lad who had the odd success

Mitchell Smith vs Antonio Horvatic coming up

handsofstone · Post by **handsofstone** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:46

rubberneck wrote:
handsofstone wrote:Anyone watching this card?

Romeo Romaeo stopped Michael Mooney in the 5th,Romao was exact same as I've seen him in every other fight,inaccurate bursts and taking far too much in return

Cracking stoppage though,Romaeo caught Mooney with a peach of a right hook out of nowhere which sent Michael staggering back against the ropes where the ref stepped in with the follow up flurry from Romeo

Cracking right hook
That's a good result. Mooney comes to win, is fit and hard as nails. Picked up a few upset wins on his travels.

He never looked like getting stopped until that shot ,landed

Boxing Prospect · Post by **Boxing Prospect** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:49

...what was the purpose of this bout? Just keep Smith ticking over?

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:52

Did you know that all of Antonio Horvatic's wins have been at the Joker Gym , and of those 6 wins the oppnents have a combined record of 3-27. WTF is Mitchell going to learn here tonight?
I'm rapidly losing interest in these undercards that pitch decent home boxers against these imports. You don't take much notice of these wins when reported in BN, as its so hard to know if any of these imports are any good.

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:54

Smith has some lovely moves and picks his shots expertly, it'll be good to see him in s proper fight.

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:55

What a punch! Jason Rowland has got a good fighter there.

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:55

BBBoC should hang their heads for allowing that to go ahead

Tangerine · Post by **Tangerine** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:55

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:56

Jesus just turned it on, what a knockout that was.

handsofstone · Post by **handsofstone** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:58

Smith KO's Horvatic in 3 and it was a beauty of a 3 punch combo,left right left,ref didn't even bother to count

Welcome addition to a pretty boring card so far

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 27 Mar 2015, 16:59

Reminiscent of Ray Leonard's ko of Dave boy green - wowza

Though unlike the sugar man, he missed the last punch thank god

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:01

Yeah the knockout a highlight reel, but look at the level of the opponent. He's never won a fight outside of his home gym

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:02

I'll tell you what, Francis Warren comes across really well.

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:02

And i say this as a fan of Smith, he sells tickets by the bucket load,

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:03

Well I can confirm I've never heard a fighter say "I've got a terrible fan base" so far

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:03

Old bones Ian wrote:Yeah the knockout a highlight reel, but look at the level of the opponent. He's never won a fight outside of his home gym

I agree. Heavy KO but hard for me to give Smith much credit considering how bad his opponent is. The previous time I saw him he was in with a Hungarian who could fight a bit and he didn't impress me.

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:05

MightyWarrior wrote:Well I can confirm I've never heard a fighter say "I've got a terrible fan base" so far

Matthew Barney?

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:05

Yeah I've never even heard of the guy, nor the dude he just beat, but that is definitely what you call doing it in style.

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:07

palooka wrote:
MightyWarrior wrote:Well I can confirm I've never heard a fighter say "I've got a terrible fan base" so far

Matthew Barney?

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:08

Ughhhh....not another one of these fights.

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:10

Really looking forward to the main event but prospect vs hopeless import match-ups just don't do it for me, regardless of how heavy the KO's may be.

handsofstone · Post by **handsofstone** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:11

Ovill's actually admitted he hasn't got a fan base

Lloyd Ellett v Raimonds Sniedze

Never seen Ellett before

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:15

crusader wrote: prospect vs hopeless import match-ups just don't do it for me,

Your're watching England v Lithuania ?

Boxing Prospect · Post by **Boxing Prospect** » 27 Mar 2015, 17:19

MightyWarrior wrote:
crusader wrote: prospect vs hopeless import match-ups just don't do it for me,
Your're watching England v Lithuania ?

It's been more competitive than the Burnett fight

askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie

Re: askin v mckenzie