askin v mckenzie
Re: askin v mckenzie
if Tom Baker fills out and gets some power he'll be some fighter..
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: askin v mckenzie
He's a tidy boxer but just doesnt have IT I reckonskanksta wrote:if Tom Baker fills out and gets some power he'll be some fighter..
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: askin v mckenzie
This fight needs IJL
Re: askin v mckenzie
Baker vs Buglioni would be a great match of styles
Think F Bug. would look outclassed early, but come back to stop Baker late..
IJL
Think F Bug. would look outclassed early, but come back to stop Baker late..
IJL
Re: askin v mckenzie
I totally forgot this card was on tonight. Is it worth catching the repeat?
Re: askin v mckenzie
Watch Mitchell Smith KO and the Ovill fight with your scorecard.
The rest can be deleted.
The rest can be deleted.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: askin v mckenzie
Not really,the main event was good but the ref spoiled it by allowing persistent fouling by Askin
Miles Shinkwin dismantling Richard Horton was excellent and Mitchell Smith's KO of Antonio Hovatic was brutal but the other 5 fights were tripe
Miles Shinkwin dismantling Richard Horton was excellent and Mitchell Smith's KO of Antonio Hovatic was brutal but the other 5 fights were tripe
Re: askin v mckenzie
Shinkwin was good - a touch of the Froch about his style.
Romeo Romaeo (sp?) was vaguely watchable
Romeo Romaeo (sp?) was vaguely watchable
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: askin v mckenzie
Baker wins 97-94
Good last couple of rounds where Greenwood had his moments but it was effectively a shite fight
Good last couple of rounds where Greenwood had his moments but it was effectively a shite fight
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: askin v mckenzie
Does Romaeo look any nearer to getting chinned??skanksta wrote:Shinkwin was good - a touch of the Froch about his style.
Romeo Romaeo (sp?) was vaguely watchable
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: askin v mckenzie
Defo. How he got away with it for the first 5 rounds is beyond me. Was blatant but effective.handsofstone wrote:The punches that landed on the back of Askin's head were mainly due to him putting his head down on McKenzie for a cuddle
BN commentary calling for a rematch. Eh no thanks.
Re: askin v mckenzie
Say what you will about the Wlad-tactics, Askin and his strategists have taken home the belts. Well done to them.
Re: askin v mckenzie
Except they didn't, unless the wrong winner was announced.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: askin v mckenzie
Have you been on the sauce for breakfast SklarSklar wrote:Say what you will about the Wlad-tactics, Askin and his strategists have taken home the belts. Well done to them.
Na as much as I was frustrated watching Askin spoil, the blame falls mainly on Marcus McDonnell who failed to enforce the rules and allowed Matty to keep fouling,it wasn't just the grappling,he was going in with the head too
Askin boxed well when letting his hands go and I was a bit surprised I had McKenzie winning when I tallied up my card at the end but he(Matty) let that get away from him
As for a rematch, no thanks,Ovill has proved himself domestically and if he can't get a title shot then an eliminator will do
Re: askin v mckenzie
Speed reading will get you nowhere.
LancashireLoyal wrote:Well done Matty British n com champ .by a round for me.
Re: askin v mckenzie
Re: askin v mckenzie
116-109
115-111
113-114
I had Ovill edging it.
115-111
113-114
I had Ovill edging it.
-
ScottDetonator
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33
Re: askin v mckenzie
I had it by about 2 points to McKenzie but I backed him to win by KO so obviously I was biased!handsofstone wrote:Not a bad tussle that,I had it 113-112 McKenzie,
Askin boxed well but got the balance wrong in some of the rounds when it came to spoiling and fighting,he'll be feeling like he let it get away but great perseverance from Ovill to claw it back
Matty should have been DQ if I'm honest but the ref let him away with it all night yet was quick to pull up McKenzie, it spoiled the fight
PS-WTF was going on with the scores? Does Mark Burdess not know what MD is and one of the scores was clearly wrong
The holding just ruined the fight and when the ref took a point from Orvil I thought it wasn't going to be his night. Managed to get 7/4 in live betting on Orvil just to win the fight around the mid-way stage, so I came out about even.
I don't like to see DQ's but Askin was, well, asking for it
Re: askin v mckenzie
Can Warren not find someone better than Burdis? He has no talent.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: askin v mckenzie
Agreed,hes woefulHorse wrote:Can Warren not find someone better than Burdis? He has no talent.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11810
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: askin v mckenzie
Look at fights from the 70's and 80's , fat bloke comes out introduced the boxers, told us who the ref was , and then that was it.
For me I blame Buffer, as everyone now tries to copy him, and fail badly
For me I blame Buffer, as everyone now tries to copy him, and fail badly
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: askin v mckenzie
Same as I got 17/10 about round 7 or 8 on Ovil. My banker was Ovil KO/TKO/DQ I was screaming for the DQScottDetonator wrote:I had it by about 2 points to McKenzie but I backed him to win by KO so obviously I was biased!handsofstone wrote:Not a bad tussle that,I had it 113-112 McKenzie,
Askin boxed well but got the balance wrong in some of the rounds when it came to spoiling and fighting,he'll be feeling like he let it get away but great perseverance from Ovill to claw it back
Matty should have been DQ if I'm honest but the ref let him away with it all night yet was quick to pull up McKenzie, it spoiled the fight
PS-WTF was going on with the scores? Does Mark Burdess not know what MD is and one of the scores was clearly wrong
The holding just ruined the fight and when the ref took a point from Orvil I thought it wasn't going to be his night. Managed to get 7/4 in live betting on Orvil just to win the fight around the mid-way stage, so I came out about even.
I don't like to see DQ's but Askin was, well, asking for it
Re: askin v mckenzie
Should be Michael Pass or the Scottish guy who has done the Frampton fights can't remember his name though.Horse wrote:Can Warren not find someone better than Burdis? He has no talent.