Mismatches!
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Mismatches!
Just had a look on bet365 and £100 on all the favourites for tonight's Matchroom show pays £161.28, that's for 7 bouts-
Moreno (1/33) [For what it's worth it's great to see Moreno over here]
Smith (1/100) [Really don't understand this bout]
Gavin (1/100)
Etches (1/3) [Solid match up, even if the odds don't really reflect it]
McDonnell (1/10)
Yafai (1/100)
and Brook (1/16) [Mandatory]
Hmmmm
Moreno (1/33) [For what it's worth it's great to see Moreno over here]
Smith (1/100) [Really don't understand this bout]
Gavin (1/100)
Etches (1/3) [Solid match up, even if the odds don't really reflect it]
McDonnell (1/10)
Yafai (1/100)
and Brook (1/16) [Mandatory]
Hmmmm
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Mismatches!
Remind me who is Moreno fighting?
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Mismatches!
Robbie TurleyCounter-puncher wrote:Remind me who is Moreno fighting?
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Mismatches!
He was listed to fight Robbie Turley, they'd void the bet meaning the 6-fold would return £156.54!Counter-puncher wrote:Remind me who is Moreno fighting?
When was it canned? :(
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Mismatches!
Really? Most bizarre match in, how long? I mean Christ on a bike abner fkin mares, if you took away the dirty tactics, could barely hit Moreno with the proverbial bag of sand. Am i going out on a limb if i say Turley is no abner mares?
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23241
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Mismatches!
I just noticed on the Matchroom site that this fight was missing,I was looking forward to seeing Moreno over here tooBoxing Prospect wrote:He was listed to fight Robbie Turley, they'd void the bet meaning the 6-fold would return £156.54!Counter-puncher wrote:Remind me who is Moreno fighting?
When was it canned? :(
Re: Mismatches!
Was pulled sometime last week, some sort of issue on Moreno's side, although from what I'd read, the board weren't too keen on the fight, so it might have something to do with that. They shoved Stephen Smith on in an 8 rounder as a replacement.handsofstone wrote:I just noticed on the Matchroom site that this fight was missing,I was looking forward to seeing Moreno over here tooBoxing Prospect wrote:He was listed to fight Robbie Turley, they'd void the bet meaning the 6-fold would return £156.54!Counter-puncher wrote:Remind me who is Moreno fighting?
When was it canned? :(
Re: Mismatches!
The odds for McDonnell and Yafai look to be the wrong way round, Yafai's opponent may be no world beater but he looks much better than McDonnell's opponent (who won 7 of his fights vs debutante and hasn't fought since 2013).Boxing Prospect wrote:Just had a look on bet365 and £100 on all the favourites for tonight's Matchroom show pays £161.28, that's for 7 bouts-
Moreno (1/33) [For what it's worth it's great to see Moreno over here]
Smith (1/100) [Really don't understand this bout]
Gavin (1/100)
Etches (1/3) [Solid match up, even if the odds don't really reflect it]
McDonnell (1/10)
Yafai (1/100)
and Brook (1/16) [Mandatory]
Hmmmm
Re: Mismatches!
Gav McDonnels fight for the Euro is a joke.
Looking forward to Etches v Khomitsky though
Looking forward to Etches v Khomitsky though
Re: Mismatches!
Well the bookies got the Ethes fight wrong,bookies odds are not always a true reflection of a fights competitiveness the bookies just give no value to the home fighter in these fights all British fights sre usually the better fight for betting.no way should Etches been 1-3 saying that backing the away fighter can be good in these fights.
Re: Mismatches!
The bookies odds are merely a reflection of the bets placed, their objective is to minimise their exposure / maximise their returns rather than to correctly predict the result of a fight - it could be that Etches is a decent ticket ticket seller and quite a few bet him to win whereas very few bet his opponent to win.ashedward wrote:Well the bookies got the Ethes fight wrong,bookies odds are not always a true reflection of a fights competitiveness the bookies just give no value to the home fighter in these fights all British fights sre usually the better fight for betting.no way should Etches been 1-3 saying that backing the away fighter can be good in these fights.
Re: Mismatches!
Exactly, that's why it annoys me when people use the odds to shit on a fight.It makes for a poor argument but some people think that the bookies odds is gospel.bripez wrote:The bookies odds are merely a reflection of the bets placed, their objective is to minimise their exposure / maximise their returns rather than to correctly predict the result of a fight - it could be that Etches is a decent ticket ticket seller and quite a few bet him to win whereas very few bet his opponent to win.ashedward wrote:Well the bookies got the Ethes fight wrong,bookies odds are not always a true reflection of a fights competitiveness the bookies just give no value to the home fighter in these fights all British fights sre usually the better fight for betting.no way should Etches been 1-3 saying that backing the away fighter can be good in these fights.