The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

57-57. But McDonnell is just too big. It shows an importance of weight management in the modern boxing.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

67-66 McDonnell
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13360
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by MightyWarrior »

nick Halling is a major league dork
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

77-75 McDonnell
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

brilo33 wrote: tell me when you see morales v pacquiao you diddnt think what pride these men have
Yeah but in a post fight interview they asked Morales what he thought of Barry McGuigan and he said 'who?'

I chucked my sofa out the window and left.
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Neil Gee »

I've not been keeping score because I keep expecting McDonnell to completely take over. He has all the tools to dismantle this guy but he's not managing to do it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?

the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?

as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

86-85 McDonnell
Last edited by Horse on 28 Mar 2015, 17:18, edited 2 times in total.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

jameswilson wrote:
brilo33 wrote: tell me when you see morales v pacquiao you diddnt think what pride these men have
Yeah but in a post fight interview they asked Morales what he thought of Barry McGuigan and he said 'who?'

I chucked my sofa out the window and left.
:bow: so much more succinctly than i managed thank you
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

Watts card was so shocking that even Hallings biased ass complained. Fight is close.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?

the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?

as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
When Churchill said 'we shall fight them on the beaches' he was referring to Morales v Pacquiao.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by brilo33 »

Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?

the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?

as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
i agree but in are on minds we make are own heroes. but when someone comes out and tells it straight it burst a bubble is all i am saying
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

96-95 McDonnell
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

95-95. Yegorov is not doing anything spectacular but still manages to hang in the fight.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

jameswilson wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?

the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?

as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
When Churchill said 'we shall fight them on the beaches' he was referring to Morales v Pacquiao.
hitler was actually a useful lightweight in his day

he overdid it with the home cooking though
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13497
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by jameswilson »

All the pecker heads saying this was a god awful fight seem to have gone quiet.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

105-105 Even
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by reggaereggae »

Counter-puncher wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?

the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?

as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
When Churchill said 'we shall fight them on the beaches' he was referring to Morales v Pacquiao.
hitler was actually a useful lightweight in his day

he overdid it with the home cooking though
:lol: :lol:

He had an advantage though in making weight. He only had one ball. Boom boom
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by crusader »

jameswilson wrote:All the pecker heads saying this was a god awful fight seem to have gone quiet.
That type of judgment shouldn't be based on what happens. Someone can intentionally try to create a mismatch and it can look as such based on available info even if it doesn't end up being one-sided.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

115-114 Yegorov
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

I cant take any more of these Nick Hallings crap. He cant even tell which fighter is busier.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Counter-puncher »

brilo33 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Brilo- when McDonnell dug in and took the last 2.rounds against Ceja, did you really not see pride in that? Do you think Manny pacquiao or Morales for that matter knows who, say, emile Griffith was? Or bob foster?

the blokes getting punched in the face for your entertainment isn't that enough for you?

as for fighting for his country? You really think in the corner round 12 to come at the end.of a torrid battle some geezers thinking 'i'm tired here but eh, queen and country, cant let the.memory of Winston Churchill down'? If you feel they are fighting for, what did you say, something about blood and country? I strongly suspect.that is a.delusion of your own choosing and that fighters fight for themselves and their family etc and that the idea.of fighting for 60 million strangers is utter bollocks, but to each their own i guess
i agree but in are on minds we make are own heroes. but when someone comes out and tells it straight it burst a bubble is all i am saying
i don't quite get it, so you'd rather they lied and said 'yeah massive fan of boxing me, student of the game, have been ever since i saw Alan 'six fingers' Atkins beat Reggie 'the ladykiller' Rogers for the central area middleweight title back in '79, big influence on me was Alan being a local boy and all, and as for Reggie what a warrior'
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Horse »

Tarkus wrote:I cant take any more of these Nick Hallings crap. He cant even tell which fighter is busier.
I think Watt might have been worse there.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by Tarkus »

Horse wrote:
Tarkus wrote:I cant take any more of these Nick Hallings crap. He cant even tell which fighter is busier.
I think Watt might have been worse there.
No man his ignorance and endless overstatements are excruciating. I would fire Watt. Halling I would hang. :D
blanca
Middleweight
Posts: 1868
Joined: 21 May 2014, 13:15

Re: The official Brook v Dan fight night discussion thread

Post by blanca »

These mcdonnell lads are ugly fuckers, yet theyve both got decent lookin lasses..shows what a bit of money and fame does for the fickle ladies!
Post Reply