Golovkin is too small for him
Maybe we will see Ward whooping his a$$ again though.
Froch has it all to lose in the GGG fight. If he wins he just beat a MW (and not even a big MW). IF he loses it could be his last fight, going out on a loss isn't ideal. And again, he would be losing to a MW which wouldn't do his legacy any favours.ikorolev wrote:http://www.livefight.com/news.php?news_ ... =2015&m=03
Golovkin is too small for him![]()
![]()
Carl keeps trying to dismiss the GGG fight.
Maybe we will see Ward whooping his a$$ again though.
I couldn't imagine Froch having a case of the ducksies but I guess it's true! All these ducks are chickening out of the fight with GGGikorolev wrote:http://www.livefight.com/news.php?news_ ... =2015&m=03
Golovkin is too small for him![]()
![]()
Carl keeps trying to dismiss the GGG fight.
Maybe we will see Ward whooping his a$$ again though.
He isn't slick and doesn't look obviously skilled but the beauty of boxing is there is no fixed way to fight. Froch is as awkward as eff and that in itself needs plenty of boxing ability.closer wrote:Froch lacks boxing ability , just has a good chin, no wonder hes afraid of GGG
He's already schooled him!lillywhite14 wrote:Martin Murray took a lot of shots against GGG and walked forward. Obviously they took their toll towards the end but ( a prime ) Froch is a bigger, better, tougher and far more awkward version of Murray. Anyone thinking GGG ( or anyone else ) has an easy night against a fit and firing Froch is a little deluded.
Before those with poor memories bring it up, no, not even Ward had an easy night against Froch. Andre was blowing out of his arse come the end of that fight and looked as uncomfortable as I have seen and as likely as we are going to see, him over the last 3/4 rounds. Andre beats him 10 times out of 10 no doubt but he doesn't 'school' him once.
The only way anyone enjoys an easy ride against Carl is if he is over the hill, which could well be the case.
So, why can't Hearn organize a Wembley bout against GGG with £10m for Froch and whatever Groves earned for GGG ?fergusg wrote: If Froch was given £10m to face Gennady Golovkin, like he earned against George Groves, with the Kazakh competing on foreign soil, then I'm sure the fight could be made.
Because that sort of money isn't there for a fight against Golovkin.ikorolev wrote:So, why can't Hearn organize a Wembley bout against GGG with £10m for Froch and whatever Groves earned for GGG ?fergusg wrote: If Froch was given £10m to face Gennady Golovkin, like he earned against George Groves, with the Kazakh competing on foreign soil, then I'm sure the fight could be made.
danamba7 wrote:Froch has it all to lose in the GGG fight. If he wins he just beat a MW (and not even a big MW). IF he loses it could be his last fight, going out on a loss isn't ideal. And again, he would be losing to a MW which wouldn't do his legacy any favours.ikorolev wrote:http://www.livefight.com/news.php?news_ ... =2015&m=03
Golovkin is too small for him![]()
![]()
Carl keeps trying to dismiss the GGG fight.
Maybe we will see Ward whooping his a$$ again though.
Some people have said it before, if anyone deserves to pick and choose his last 1 or 2 fights, it's Froch. What more do we want from him!?
expe wrote:He's already schooled him!lillywhite14 wrote:Martin Murray took a lot of shots against GGG and walked forward. Obviously they took their toll towards the end but ( a prime ) Froch is a bigger, better, tougher and far more awkward version of Murray. Anyone thinking GGG ( or anyone else ) has an easy night against a fit and firing Froch is a little deluded.
Before those with poor memories bring it up, no, not even Ward had an easy night against Froch. Andre was blowing out of his arse come the end of that fight and looked as uncomfortable as I have seen and as likely as we are going to see, him over the last 3/4 rounds. Andre beats him 10 times out of 10 no doubt but he doesn't 'school' him once.
The only way anyone enjoys an easy ride against Carl is if he is over the hill, which could well be the case.
So, it was there for a "super star" Groves, but it is not there for Golovkin ? I doubt that it is true. If it is, isn't it promoter's work to actually promote a fight educating people that Golovkin is a much bigger name than Groves and that Froch vs GGG will be fireworks for as long as it lasts ?expe wrote:Because that sort of money isn't there for a fight against Golovkin.ikorolev wrote:So, why can't Hearn organize a Wembley bout against GGG with £10m for Froch and whatever Groves earned for GGG ?fergusg wrote: If Froch was given £10m to face Gennady Golovkin, like he earned against George Groves, with the Kazakh competing on foreign soil, then I'm sure the fight could be made.
GGG would take a Froch fight at 168 if he gets millions like Groves did. He clearly stated that he will go up or down for a PPV fight.Tristram Shandy wrote:GGG isn't an option, having stated more than once he isn't ready to move to 168lbs, so why does Froch keep rattling on about him? (for what it's worth I reckon he'd lose in a similar fashion to Murray)
So Froch doesn't want GGG (not a factor anyway) doesn't want Ward, doesn't want Degale, DID want Hopkins then changed his mind, it will be f*cking hilarious if he gets him dream fight with Fatty Chavez and ends up getting battered.
I would laugh, long and hard ... yes
Golovkin isn't a bigger name than Groves here, that's the point. They can hype it up as much as they want, it won't do anywhere near the sort of numbers the second fight did.ikorolev wrote:So, it was there for a "super star" Groves, but it is not there for Golovkin ? I doubt that it is true. If it is, isn't it promoter's work to actually promote a fight educating people that Golovkin is a much bigger name than Groves and that Froch vs GGG will be fireworks for as long as it lasts ?expe wrote:Because that sort of money isn't there for a fight against Golovkin.ikorolev wrote:
So, why can't Hearn organize a Wembley bout against GGG with £10m for Froch and whatever Groves earned for GGG ?
Froch was schooled for 10 rounds, then won the last two as Ward faded, until then though it was one sided, Ward beat Froch at his own game, stronger than him up close and picked him off all fight while one of his hands was broken. I agree with you on Naz and Barrera, it wasn't anywhere near a shutout, but Naz was put in his place by Barrera and it gets called a schooling when Naz won 3-5 rounds in that fight.lillywhite14 wrote:expe wrote:He's already schooled him!lillywhite14 wrote:Martin Murray took a lot of shots against GGG and walked forward. Obviously they took their toll towards the end but ( a prime ) Froch is a bigger, better, tougher and far more awkward version of Murray. Anyone thinking GGG ( or anyone else ) has an easy night against a fit and firing Froch is a little deluded.
Before those with poor memories bring it up, no, not even Ward had an easy night against Froch. Andre was blowing out of his arse come the end of that fight and looked as uncomfortable as I have seen and as likely as we are going to see, him over the last 3/4 rounds. Andre beats him 10 times out of 10 no doubt but he doesn't 'school' him once.
The only way anyone enjoys an easy ride against Carl is if he is over the hill, which could well be the case.
Depends how you class a schooling though Expe. I didn't see a schooling. Just like I didn't see a schooling when Barrera beat Naz, another fight that often gets remembered as a complete shut out.
Calzaghe schooled Lacy. That's the type of completely one sided victory I class as a schooling
That makes me feel sorry for those "fans". They don't learn when their "stars" get beaten by journeymen like Khomitsky and don't appreciate real stars.expe wrote:Golovkin isn't a bigger name than Groves here, that's the point. They can hype it up as much as they want, it won't do anywhere near the sort of numbers the second fight did.ikorolev wrote:So, it was there for a "super star" Groves, but it is not there for Golovkin ? I doubt that it is true. If it is, isn't it promoter's work to actually promote a fight educating people that Golovkin is a much bigger name than Groves and that Froch vs GGG will be fireworks for as long as it lasts ?expe wrote: Because that sort of money isn't there for a fight against Golovkin.
Abraham's whole style is based on physical strength and power, but he isn't much of a boxer. His strength and power were negated somewhat at 168lbs and his limitations as 'boxer' badly exposed. GGG has MUCH more than simply strength and power, he is one of the most efficient and complete fighters I've ever seen. I don't think he will 'blow away' Froch but I can see Froch taking a fairly one sided beating before succumbing in the later rounds like Murray. Froch simply doesn't have the skill to outbox GGG and it's unlikely he can flatten him with one punch (the second Groves apart, when does Froch take anyone out with a single shot?)crusader wrote:GGG hasn't proven that he'd still be a serious banger at 168, and one can look at Arthur Abraham to see that power doesn't always carry up.