Someone who was told why he signed with Haymon. Why else would he? Who told him to sidestep Alexander first time? Hardly the sort of decision he'd make himself.ALI wrote:And you are?gobbles wrote:ALI wrote:
Who promotes Pacquiao? There, i've thought about it for you.
You have a point about Haymon/Khan playing the waiting game, but really, how long can Khan continue to put his career on hold, he's been bangung on about Mayweather for so long now and he has been cherry picking his oponents since the time he got splattered by Garcia almost 3 years. ago
Mayweather-Paquiao got made in spite of Haymon rather than because of him.
Khan signed with Haymon because he got promised Mayweather.
Showtime turn down Khan-Algieri
Re: Showtime turn down Khan-Algieri
Re: Showtime turn down Khan-Algieri
Nobody then, guessing just like the rest of us.gobbles wrote:Someone who was told why he signed with Haymon. Why else would he? Who told him to sidestep Alexander first time? Hardly the sort of decision he'd make himself.ALI wrote:And you are?gobbles wrote:
Mayweather-Paquiao got made in spite of Haymon rather than because of him.
Khan signed with Haymon because he got promised Mayweather.
Just In case you failed to notice, they're all signing with Haymon. Cant all be to do with the Mayweather sweepstakes.
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Showtime turn down Khan-Algieri
Is it?Taansend wrote:People pointed out that Khan Algieri is more recognisable to sports fans in the US than Khan Brook.Pugilist-specialist wrote:Showtime showed Brook's fight live last Saturday and then put it on again at 11pm. Some on here try to claim that nobody knows Brook in USA.
That's still the case.
Showtime executives would disagree. Who backs up your argument?