who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23112
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by handsofstone »

pyenest77 wrote:
G0mez wrote:Liverpool's Neil Perkins did well as an amateur, world bronze.

6-0 as a professional but not afforded much coverage so far.

Hopefully he gets a few more outings under his belt in the next 12 months and into a interesting domestic fight with a Beefy Smith/ Brian Rose type fighter.

Tidy boxer.
He is getting on a bit now is Neil maybe turned over a bit late?
I've been impressed with what I've seen of Perkins but surely he's got to be more active
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by stevedoc »

Slightly off topic but there's a trainer at the Fitzroy lodge Roy Connor who won it all as an amateur ,he beat Michael Watson , rod Douglas ,Canadian Shawn o,Sullivan who was world no1 and went on a run of 100 fights unbeaten then quit.
kamicazze
Cruiserweight
Posts: 721
Joined: 30 Aug 2010, 10:26

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by kamicazze »

palooka wrote:Gary Mayor did well a couple of weeks ago, there was a write up in Boxing News.
He's won one of those central area elite titles too. He is aiming to be the oldest man to win the ABA's. Would be some story ...
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by manno »

stevedoc wrote:Slightly off topic but there's a trainer at the Fitzroy lodge Roy Connor who won it all as an amateur ,he beat Michael Watson , rod Douglas ,Canadian Shawn o,Sullivan who was world no1 and went on a run of 100 fights unbeaten then quit.
I remember roy...seem to get his big wins at the wrong time if that makes sense! Dint win abas and was never no1 in England (nearly).Osullivan was a right handful as I remember....prob Roys best win. Very correct boxer, easy on the eye. Glad hes puttin it back at the lodge. Howard Rainey used to rave about him :TU:
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by stevedoc »

manno wrote:
stevedoc wrote:Slightly off topic but there's a trainer at the Fitzroy lodge Roy Connor who won it all as an amateur ,he beat Michael Watson , rod Douglas ,Canadian Shawn o,Sullivan who was world no1 and went on a run of 100 fights unbeaten then quit.
I remember roy...seem to get his big wins at the wrong time if that makes sense! Dint win abas and was never no1 in England (nearly).Osullivan was a right handful as I remember....prob Roys best win. Very correct boxer, easy on the eye. Glad hes puttin it back at the lodge. Howard Rainey used to rave about him :TU:
To be honest I don't remember Roy as a boxer I met him at the lodge about 18 months ago and thought he was pulling my leg at first when he talked about his career ,nice guy
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6834
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by Noxy »

I always thought Mark Epton would be one to follow but he just packed it in early doors. I know there's that rumour about Hamed retiring him after a sparring session but I never really bought into that. In any case I didn't see his retirement coming so soon, whatever may have caused it.
Wake up call
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by Wake up call »

Chris Pacey and Nick MacDonald were both ABA champions who did pretty much sod all as pros. Sure there's been many more.
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by manno »

mercman wrote:
Noxy wrote:I always thought Mark Epton would be one to follow but he just packed it in early doors. I know there's that rumour about Hamed retiring him after a sparring session but I never really bought into that. In any case I didn't see his retirement coming so soon, whatever may have caused it.
I think that's just what happened.
A proper pasting. However Mark must have been ready to pack in cos I don't think there can be many career fighters who haven't had some decent seconds. From bomber being Kayoed to a novice Laing schooling world champ Hope it happens all the time.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by mickey1975 »

I've seen 18 year old ams beating up pros in the gym. Doesn't mean a thing. Epton must have had other things going on. I once saw my mate, a light welter, really giving it to Paul Bonson, who I didn't know at the time. I thought they should have stopped it! One of the best chins England's ever seen! He was just moving him about!
Bigdogsnose
Middleweight
Posts: 1465
Joined: 02 Dec 2013, 08:36

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by Bigdogsnose »

Roco wrote:Why did Andy McLean turn back amateur?
Don't think he ever went back to the Ams. Had to retire due to an eye injury. Pity could box and bang. Runs a PT company and promotes White collar.
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by manno »

mickey1975 wrote:I've seen 18 year old ams beating up pros in the gym. Doesn't mean a thing. Epton must have had other things going on. I once saw my mate, a light welter, really giving it to Paul Bonson, who I didn't know at the time. I thought they should have stopped it! One of the best chins England's ever seen! He was just moving him about!
:TU: f@@k me mickey...boxed paul twice...haes like a kerbstone. Think only rob norton turned him over in nearly 100 fights...might have had over 100...have a look at his resume :KO: regular sparring partner for carl thompson at one bit.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by mickey1975 »

I was young and daft at the time, in Hunslet gym. My mate was a very good kid who landed a few, little did I know, he could have brought a sledgehammer, wouldn't have made any difference.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9197
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by Controversial »

Errol Christie springs to mind, he was in the Guinness Book of Records at one point for the amount of amateur titles he won and was even given an honouree pair of Kronk shorts to wear as a pro. His was tipped for stardom but after a good start as a pro his chin was soon found out and I don't think he won a single title. Saying that he was still a good fighter and a big puncher, just not a major success as a pro. I hear he isn't in good health these days so good luck to him.
nitro5912
Middleweight
Posts: 733
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 13:02

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by nitro5912 »

Do you think we will see more good amateurs make it in the pro game now that at senior level they don't wear head guards?

Proved to have a good chin, good head movement etc?
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9197
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by Controversial »

I don't think you can tell. Lots of successful pros have been stopped or knocked out as amateurs, Holmes, Tyson and Tua (not so successful but renown for having a good chin)
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by freddydoesdallas »

I'll mention the elephant in the room...

Lomachenko - 396-1 as an amatuer, already 3-1 as a pro
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9197
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by Controversial »

freddydoesdallas wrote:I'll mention the elephant in the room...

Lomachenko - 396-1 as an amatuer, already 3-1 as a pro
to be fair he fought for a world title in his 2nd pro fight (that he lost on a SD to a 54 fight veteran who was also over the weight limit) and then Lomachenko won a world title in his 3rd fight. I wouldn't call that not being a good pro.
Last edited by Controversial on 08 Apr 2015, 10:45, edited 1 time in total.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by palooka »

Howard Davis?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by palooka »

Mark Tibbs
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by manno »

mercman wrote:Pete Gabbitus.
:TU: superb boxer pete.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by crusader »

freddydoesdallas wrote:I'll mention the elephant in the room...

Lomachenko - 396-1 as an amatuer, already 3-1 as a pro
You don't think he's made a good pro? He at least seems to be on that path to me.

I'd also be surprised if 396-1 was his real amateur record.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by mickey1975 »

manno wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I've seen 18 year old ams beating up pros in the gym. Doesn't mean a thing. Epton must have had other things going on. I once saw my mate, a light welter, really giving it to Paul Bonson, who I didn't know at the time. I thought they should have stopped it! One of the best chins England's ever seen! He was just moving him about!
:TU: f@@k me mickey...boxed paul twice...haes like a kerbstone. Think only rob norton turned him over in nearly 100 fights...might have had over 100...have a look at his resume :KO: regular sparring partner for carl thompson at one bit.
Paul didn't care, got in with two kids after, one just got back from The Commonwealths, the other going into an eliminator. Tough, tough man.
rpms
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by rpms »

palooka wrote:Mark Tibbs
Good call,and Dean Hollington too
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by manno »

mercman wrote:
manno wrote:
mercman wrote:Pete Gabbitus.
:TU: superb boxer pete.
But came nowhere near fulfilling his potential. Won everythng going as a kd but he was encouraged to turn professional too early, and was poorly managed thereafter, at least in my opinion.
Your opinion is correct
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: who showed promise in the amateurs..BUT

Post by manno »

rpms wrote:
palooka wrote:Mark Tibbs
Good call,and Dean Hollington too
Didnt chris saunders chin em both?
Post Reply