Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Batley18
Super Middleweight
Posts: 567
Joined: 18 Sep 2012, 06:29

Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Batley18 »

Rigondeaux's manager said they would be happy to fight Quigg.

Lets see what Hearn does with this one. I would love to see it, although the Cuban would be way too good for Scott.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Andrew »

No chance of this happening even though Hearn could get this at the Manchester Arena for Quiggs next fight without issues.

I think Quigg moves up soon if he doesnt fight Frampton. Thats going off what Gallagher has said btw.
Ronthetruth
Super Welterweight
Posts: 62
Joined: 03 Apr 2015, 18:21

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Ronthetruth »

Would love to see rigo on sky and getting some decent coverage! Massive UD win
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by whiskey »

He actually offered to fight both I gather.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Crease »

Gary Hyde would accept a fight against Frampton, Quigg or Santa Cruz, in my opinion he's coming across more than a little desperate. Hyde really seems to be struggling getting Rigondeaux a meaningful fight, I'm not sure that he has the clout or the know how compared to some of the other promoters knocking around out there.

And considering a prospective Quigg vs Rigondeaux bout, I say two things.

1 - I give this fight less than 10% of happening - if the fight happens then -

2. - He will lose and relinquish his WBA "regular" Title.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Crease »

Terry Dooley wrote:Offered both out. Said they'll take 1.5 over the two fights in Manchester and Belfast. Technically, Quigg is his mandatory so they may lobby WBA. Good luck with that.
I thin it's all smoke screen and mirrors. Hearn is no fool, he knows if this were to happen Quigg would lose his title and his unbeaten record. Then, that would spell the end of the Scott Quigg - cash cow venture.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Naandrew wrote:No chance of this happening even though Hearn could get this at the Manchester Arena for Quiggs next fight without issues.

I think Quigg moves up soon if he doesnt fight Frampton. Thats going off what Gallagher has said btw.
If Quigg has to fight Rigo, I think he'll move up to feather instead.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

It just shows how poor a "sport" that Boxing has become. Fighters dodging the best and moving up weights to avoid the best in their division.

Hearn and Quigg are not alone in this, but that doesn't make it right. So frustrating for all of us that the best fights are avoided.
thatllbeme
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 18 Jun 2012, 16:55

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by thatllbeme »

Quigg should fight Kid Galahad if Frampton fight cant be made but I think they will go for Donaire ahead of Rigondeaux
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by ajwesty13 »

Rigo team wanted this fight due to the wba belt being shared as it were ...I Like Quigg but cant see him get past this one, rigo has miles to much skill.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Crease »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:It just shows how poor a "sport" that Boxing has become. Fighters dodging the best and moving up weights to avoid the best in their division.
100% agree mate.

I've been saying this for years, whenever people talk about a fighter and say stuff like "he's been a World Champion in 2 weights", I just shrug it off and say "did he beat the best"?

It's partly the reason I have the utmost respect for Carl Froch. A guy who has stayed in his weight division and fought every top contender and champion who was about during his time. I'd always much, much rather see that then 5/6/7 different boys jumping and hopping up and down the weights and fighting for vacant titles, adding to their own hype.

:shame:
JayMc
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:30

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by JayMc »

I don't think Quigg Vs Rigondeaux sells at all. Hardly any of the casual boxing fans even know who Rigondeaux is.

There is no money to be made in this fight and I think Hearn knows this one is too much risk for very little return..
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Tarkus »

Rigo asked WBA to mandate Quigg defense. Thats the only chance of this fight happening but so far WBA does not seem to be willing to do it. I still have enough respect for Quigg to believe he would not vacate if it was mandated.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4961
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by rd350lc »

Great ringwalk !
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Stuarty »

I am a massive Frampton fan and although if might be a bit biased I genuinely think Carl would beat Rigo! I think he would KO Quigg too but I don't think Scott is an easy nights work for anyone!
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Crease »

Crispy Hudson wrote: Froch has won two vacant world 'titles' . . .
Yeah through no fault of his own. Joe calzaghe chose not to fight him. And Kessler had a lon term injury.
ClivePatrickLyons
Middleweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Rigondeaux destroys Poor Quigg :TU:
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Stuarty30 wrote:I am a massive Frampton fan and although if might be a bit biased I genuinely think Carl would beat Rigo!
McGuigan also claims that Frampton is no.1 in the division.
It would be an easy fight to make - Frampton's not got an opponent but I'm predicting another easy defence.
smoothmoves
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 287
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 14:48

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by smoothmoves »

Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Tarkus »

smoothmoves wrote:http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/rigonde ... igg-286474

Could get interesting
High time to head to Marbella Quiggy.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Ian1973 »

I'm another Frampton man. A bit like Calzaghe in his time people don't realise how good Frampton is.

Frampton beats Rigondeaux and anybody else in that division.
Marlo Stanfield
Middleweight
Posts: 447
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 14:38

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Marlo Stanfield »

Ian1973 wrote:I'm another Frampton man. A bit like Calzaghe in his time people don't realise how good Frampton is.

Frampton beats Rigondeaux and anybody else in that division.
Why won't he fight him then?
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by DazDiCanio »

Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:I'm another Frampton man. A bit like Calzaghe in his time people don't realise how good Frampton is.

Frampton beats Rigondeaux and anybody else in that division.
Why won't he fight him then?
Fair question.
Anyone can talk their way to being the best, Carl is very likable and is marketed brilliantly but no point calling out the best if you're not going to fight them.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32989
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Ian1973 wrote:I'm another Frampton man. A bit like Calzaghe in his time people don't realise how good Frampton is.

Frampton beats Rigondeaux and anybody else in that division.
Although I'd definitely be rooting for Frampton if they fought, I don't think he gets near Rigondeaux tbh.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Quigg Vs Rigondeaux

Post by palooka »

Rigondeaux is too good for his own good, they should get him on the same bills as Lomachenko - they are the brilliant amateur standouts and are so well schooled, so quick and talented they should be big names and well paid.
Post Reply