bripez wrote:It'll be a cracker by the time he gets out.Rexob wrote:Great beard!
Graham Earl
Re: Graham Earl
Re: Graham Earl
G0mez wrote:I can't see the resemblance myself.Ketchel_2008 wrote:Can't believe no one has commented on how he looks like a young Jim Royle !Rexob wrote:Great beard!
Re: Graham Earl
Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Re: Graham Earl
Was he a full time pro throughout his career or did he work a job? I'd imagine he'd have made enough to not have to work full time after he won the British and he'd have been able to buy his home most likely but I doubt he rolled about in 50's and 20's very often.REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Re: Graham Earl
palooka wrote:Was he a full time pro throughout his career or did he work a job? I'd imagine he'd have made enough to not have to work full time after he won the British and he'd have been able to buy his home most likely but I doubt he rolled about in 50's and 20's very often.REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Looks like he has been rolling a few up though.
Re: Graham Earl
Probably made good money while he was fighting and from his first fight with Bobby Vanzie to fighting Khan I think he would have been a full time pro. But he won't have made anywhere near enough to retire off and when he retired he needed to find another way of earning, promoted a few shows, tried managing and training fighters and eventually made a comeback. At some point he will have fallen into dealing as a way of paying the bills.REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Re: Graham Earl
it's a joke how little pro boxers make when u think how much footballers make it's shite really.expe wrote:Probably made good money while he was fighting and from his first fight with Bobby Vanzie to fighting Khan I think he would have been a full time pro. But he won't have made anywhere near enough to retire off and when he retired he needed to find another way of earning, promoted a few shows, tried managing and training fighters and eventually made a comeback. At some point he will have fallen into dealing as a way of paying the bills.REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Graham Earl
REEVE wrote:it's a joke how little pro boxers make when u think how much footballers make it's shite really.expe wrote:Probably made good money while he was fighting and from his first fight with Bobby Vanzie to fighting Khan I think he would have been a full time pro. But he won't have made anywhere near enough to retire off and when he retired he needed to find another way of earning, promoted a few shows, tried managing and training fighters and eventually made a comeback. At some point he will have fallen into dealing as a way of paying the bills.REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
I know mate,it makes me sick really,what these fighters have to go through and sometimes just for a couple of hundred quid.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23176
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Graham Earl
A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Graham Earl
This could be his chance to meet Rolf?Stuarty30 wrote:He'll only end up doing 36-42 months. He looks like Rolf Harris' long lost love child in that picture!Like a Boss wrote:He looks terrible now. Can only imagine how he's going to look in 2022 when he gets out.Old bones Ian wrote:
Re: Graham Earl
Rolf won't be interested unless he starts using oil of ulay and immac heavily.
Re: Graham Earl
Has he been telling tales?mickey1975 wrote:A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Re: Graham Earl
"Professional boxing saved me from a life of using drugs
... Because I cannot afford them now"
... Because I cannot afford them now"
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23176
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Graham Earl
So they say.palooka wrote:Has he been telling tales?mickey1975 wrote:A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Re: Graham Earl
A lot of scruffy looking people about at the moment. The sooner big beards go out of fashion the better.
Re: Graham Earl
The natural look is KING!
Re: Graham Earl
So, you are inferring that a person(s) unknown has been telling tales about another person allegedly telling tales?mickey1975 wrote:So they say.palooka wrote:Has he been telling tales?mickey1975 wrote:A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Sounds like an episode of TOWIE to me.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23176
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Graham Earl
No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
Re: Graham Earl
Yeah don't grass on a grassmickey1975 wrote:No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
But why mention it at all?
Re: Graham Earl
I don't know any of the gossip and don't care to. They gave the lad three years eight months which whilst close to the bottom of the sentencing range for Cat 2 lesser role intent to supply (if that's where the offence was placed) If it was a first offence and he was only a storeman who pleaded guilty, it's still enough time for 20 grands worth of gear without him having to be a grass, isn''t it?mickey1975 wrote:No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23176
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Graham Earl
You've lost me. I'm on about a totally different guy.Sklar wrote:I don't know any of the gossip and don't care to. They gave the lad three years eight months which whilst close to the bottom of the sentencing range for Cat 2 lesser role intent to supply (if that's where the offence was placed) If it was a first offence and he was only a storeman who pleaded guilty, it's still enough time for 20 grands worth of gear without him having to be a grass, isn''t it?mickey1975 wrote:No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
Re: Graham Earl
Nudge nudge wink wink say no more
Re: Graham Earl
Sklar wrote:Oh.

