Graham Earl

Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Rexob »

bripez wrote:
Rexob wrote:Great beard!
It'll be a cracker by the time he gets out.

:OhYes: :lol:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Rexob »

G0mez wrote:
Ketchel_2008 wrote:
Rexob wrote:Great beard!
Can't believe no one has commented on how he looks like a young Jim Royle !
I can't see the resemblance myself.

Image
:lol: :lol:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23240
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Graham Earl

Post by handsofstone »

:lol:
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 777
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Graham Earl

Post by REEVE »

Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Graham Earl

Post by palooka »

REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Was he a full time pro throughout his career or did he work a job? I'd imagine he'd have made enough to not have to work full time after he won the British and he'd have been able to buy his home most likely but I doubt he rolled about in 50's and 20's very often.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Rexob »

palooka wrote:
REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Was he a full time pro throughout his career or did he work a job? I'd imagine he'd have made enough to not have to work full time after he won the British and he'd have been able to buy his home most likely but I doubt he rolled about in 50's and 20's very often.

Looks like he has been rolling a few up though.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Graham Earl

Post by expe »

REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Probably made good money while he was fighting and from his first fight with Bobby Vanzie to fighting Khan I think he would have been a full time pro. But he won't have made anywhere near enough to retire off and when he retired he needed to find another way of earning, promoted a few shows, tried managing and training fighters and eventually made a comeback. At some point he will have fallen into dealing as a way of paying the bills.
REEVE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 777
Joined: 19 Apr 2010, 19:12

Re: Graham Earl

Post by REEVE »

expe wrote:
REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Probably made good money while he was fighting and from his first fight with Bobby Vanzie to fighting Khan I think he would have been a full time pro. But he won't have made anywhere near enough to retire off and when he retired he needed to find another way of earning, promoted a few shows, tried managing and training fighters and eventually made a comeback. At some point he will have fallen into dealing as a way of paying the bills.
it's a joke how little pro boxers make when u think how much footballers make it's shite really.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Graham Earl

Post by bigjack »

REEVE wrote:
expe wrote:
REEVE wrote:Would he not of made some decent ££ in his career ?
Probably made good money while he was fighting and from his first fight with Bobby Vanzie to fighting Khan I think he would have been a full time pro. But he won't have made anywhere near enough to retire off and when he retired he needed to find another way of earning, promoted a few shows, tried managing and training fighters and eventually made a comeback. At some point he will have fallen into dealing as a way of paying the bills.
it's a joke how little pro boxers make when u think how much footballers make it's shite really.



I know mate,it makes me sick really,what these fighters have to go through and sometimes just for a couple of hundred quid.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23176
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Graham Earl

Post by mickey1975 »

A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Like a Boss »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:Image
He looks terrible now. Can only imagine how he's going to look in 2022 when he gets out.
He'll only end up doing 36-42 months. He looks like Rolf Harris' long lost love child in that picture!
This could be his chance to meet Rolf?
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Graham Earl

Post by orbtastic »

Rolf won't be interested unless he starts using oil of ulay and immac heavily.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Graham Earl

Post by palooka »

mickey1975 wrote:A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Has he been telling tales?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Graham Earl

Post by whiskey »

"Professional boxing saved me from a life of using drugs

... Because I cannot afford them now"
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23176
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Graham Earl

Post by mickey1975 »

palooka wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Has he been telling tales?
So they say.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Sklar »

A lot of scruffy looking people about at the moment. The sooner big beards go out of fashion the better.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Rexob »

The natural look is KING!
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Graham Earl

Post by bripez »

mickey1975 wrote:
palooka wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:A boxer from my area has just been done for dealing and dealt with very leniently by the courts and the board. His names dirt amongst the criminal fraternity.
Has he been telling tales?
So they say.
So, you are inferring that a person(s) unknown has been telling tales about another person allegedly telling tales?

Sounds like an episode of TOWIE to me.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23176
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Graham Earl

Post by mickey1975 »

No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Lenny »

mickey1975 wrote:No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
Yeah don't grass on a grass

But why mention it at all?
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Sklar »

mickey1975 wrote:No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
I don't know any of the gossip and don't care to. They gave the lad three years eight months which whilst close to the bottom of the sentencing range for Cat 2 lesser role intent to supply (if that's where the offence was placed) If it was a first offence and he was only a storeman who pleaded guilty, it's still enough time for 20 grands worth of gear without him having to be a grass, isn''t it?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23176
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Graham Earl

Post by mickey1975 »

Sklar wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:No. I'm know the person and the facts. I'm not naming him, upsetting a lot of friends in my area just to proove a stranger wrong.
I don't know any of the gossip and don't care to. They gave the lad three years eight months which whilst close to the bottom of the sentencing range for Cat 2 lesser role intent to supply (if that's where the offence was placed) If it was a first offence and he was only a storeman who pleaded guilty, it's still enough time for 20 grands worth of gear without him having to be a grass, isn''t it?
You've lost me. I'm on about a totally different guy.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Sklar »

Oh.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Graham Earl

Post by Tomasino »

:lol:

Nudge nudge wink wink say no more :roll:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Graham Earl

Post by palooka »

Sklar wrote:Oh.
:OhYes: ah well.
Post Reply