Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post Reply
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by ALI »

Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.

Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Rexob »

I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Horse »

ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.
A win against Hopkins, even at this stage, would significantly improve Froch's resume. It would arguably be his best win.
ALI wrote:Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
There was no one better than Smith that they tried to get? Stieglitz, Sturm etc?

Also why is Ward vs Smith at a catchweight of 172 lbs? That seems strange.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Rexob »

Horse wrote:
ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.
A win against Hopkins, even at this stage, would significantly improve Froch's resume. It would arguably be his best win.
ALI wrote:Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
There was no one better than Smith that they tried to get? Stieglitz, Sturm etc?

Also why is Ward vs Smith at a catchweight of 172 lbs? That seems strange.

10 years ago not now?

It's a bit like saying Khans best win was over Barrera?
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by brilo33 »

be gutted to see froch last fight against b hop.much rather james de gale if he wins his fight. why not Andrzej Fonfara be fun i bet
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Horse »

Rexob wrote:10 years ago not now?

It's a bit like saying Khans best win was over Barrera?
Hopkins was a unified champion less than 6 months ago and he is still a top 3 ranked fighter at light heavyweight.

It would definitely be one of Froch's best wins and possibly his best win. It would also be a great introduction to the light heavyweight division for Froch if he wanted to continue fighting.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by expe »

Rexob wrote:I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
Probably wouldn't be in Vegas though, Hopkins has hardly ever fought there in the past and I can't see him fighting Froch there, would probably end up in Atlantic City.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Rexob »

expe wrote:
Rexob wrote:I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
Probably wouldn't be in Vegas though, Hopkins has hardly ever fought there in the past and I can't see him fighting Froch there, would probably end up in Atlantic City.

Vegas or nothing I would have thought?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by expe »

Rexob wrote:
expe wrote:
Rexob wrote:I don't really want to see Froch fight Hopkins but if it's the only fight that's available for Froch to tick his last boxing goal, by fighting in Vegas then YES why not?
Probably wouldn't be in Vegas though, Hopkins has hardly ever fought there in the past and I can't see him fighting Froch there, would probably end up in Atlantic City.

Vegas or nothing I would have thought?
That will likely be Froch's attitude, but him fighting there depends on the opponent and Hopkins hasn't fought in Las Vegas for a long time, if the Kovalev fight wasn't there, I don't think a fight against Froch would be either.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by leejonesjnr »

I'm just not a Froch fan but if what he wants is a name opponent that he has a good chance of beating in Vegas, what more can he ask for?
Goldenboy would have no problems putting together a show on the strip and Hopkins seems happy to go for it.
I suspect that Froch will retire if he doesn't get a beatable name in LV.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by bigjack »

leejonesjnr wrote:I'm just not a Froch fan but if what he wants is a name opponent that he has a good chance of beating in Vegas, what more can he ask for?
Goldenboy would have no problems putting together a show on the strip and Hopkins seems happy to go for it.
I suspect that Froch will retire if he doesn't get a beatable name in LV.

It's a terrible fight,Bhop will stink the place out.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12070
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Taansend »

Hopkins is the LAST fight I'd want Froch to face. Win ugly or lose badly.

Aside from Ward there's nothing at SM for Carl in Vegas.

If I was his manager I'd be wary about having him fight again. Except against Ward. Not saying he'd win that but just from a motivational point of view
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by crusader »

I still wish that he'd try Stevenson and/or Kovalev at 175. He's generally seemed firm on not moving up and I wonder if he doubts his chances against them.

A Hopkins fight would likely be ugly and BHOP did get thrashed in his last fight, but he's still a name, highly ranked, and it seems to me that despite not winning a round in his last outing there is a sizable group who like his chances against Froch,. It's certainly winnable for Froch, in fact I think that Hopkins may be overrated and I was surprised to see how many picked him to beat Kovalev, and if he wants a big American name for a US send-off I think it would be a relatively good option.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23176
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by mickey1975 »

He looks content enough to me at the minute. I don't think he will box again.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10169
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by samwbr »

ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.

Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
Ward who has fought once in almost 2 years saying Froch had disappeared? And then saying Smith was willing to travel but he wouldn't fight in Nottingham and he could fill Wembley yet he can't get a mainstream broadcaster in the US. He seems a bit confused.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by keirw »

samwbr wrote:
ALI wrote:Styles make fights, Hopkins is all wrong for Froch, he would fight extremely conservative and try to eek out a points win. Other than cashing out there is no reason for him to fight Hopkins, a win over Bhop at this stage of his career does nothing for Frochs resume IMO. Mind you, it would do more than Chavez ever would have.

Interesting to watch Ward on IFLTV yesterday, he's saying Froch has ducked a rematch with him so they went for Smith as a 2nd option. From what i could gather over recent weeks team Froch were saying it was Ward who was not playing ball for a rematch, Ward's just called bullsh*t on those claims.
Ward who has fought once in almost 2 years saying Froch had disappeared? And then saying Smith was willing to travel but he wouldn't fight in Nottingham and he could fill Wembley yet he can't get a mainstream broadcaster in the US. He seems a bit confused.
Ward seems a little delusional, he seems to confuse talent with selling ability. I must admit, I have some sympathy for him as he is in one of the only sports in the world where being the best in the world doesn't necessarily mean you get paid the most.
He also keeps saying no one wants to fight him yet from what I can gather, he has turned down fights with Froch, Kessler and Degale.
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by WildWaylon »

Froch will go for easy options. Not DeGale and definitely not Golovkin.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by wesshaw1985 »

there isn't a fight to make in Vegas.
Ward, Hopkins or Golovkin in New York will be the best option Stateside...
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Winnable Swansong for Froch in Vegas

Post by Stuarty »

I don't think Hopkins would be anywhere near Frochs best win. It's a hiding to nothing fight. I'd like to see him fight DeGale if he manages to overcome Dirrell.
Post Reply