Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post Reply
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by tobyh5 »

I was just watching Boxing Matters with Colin Hart as a guest and was exasperated as I listened. His top ten welterweights had Pernell Whittaker listed but no Pacquiao which is not something I am going to argue about but what I made me tut loudly was his reasoning. He said he would not list Pac at welter as he was better as a super bantam and feather which if that is his opinion is fair enough but surely that would then disqualify Pernell as he was a better Lightweight than Welter. They both have great resumes at Welter for stand alone judgement at that weight with Pernell getting some big wins, ditto Pac. If you have reasoning for something like this it must be consistent

Then I got more fecked off with the old sod when he spoke about the career of Trinidad, saying he had beaten Oscar but lost to Chavez. Uhm, perhaps I slept for a year but I do not recall that ever happening!

Part 1 of the show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvPn8Q_tdUs

Part 2 of the show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChYCniO ... freload=10
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by ste1983 »

I missed it this week was gonna look for it being repeated now I know Harts on I won't bother.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by Stuarty »

I can't stick Colin Hart! I'll give that show a by this week!
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by bigjack »

Stuarty30 wrote:I can't stick Colin Hart! I'll give that show a by this week!

Neither can i, he's stuck in a time warp.I once had the unfortunate pleasure of seeing him sprawled out on a sun bed in Vegas and it wasn't a particularly pleasant sight i can assure you :lol:
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by black panther »

Colin Hart is terrible. I sometimes wonder if he even likes boxing. He'll somehow always manage to relate a fight to Ali and Frazier.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by Stuarty »

bigjack wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I can't stick Colin Hart! I'll give that show a by this week!

Neither can i, he's stuck in a time warp.I once had the unfortunate pleasure of seeing him sprawled out on a sun bed in Vegas and it wasn't a particularly pleasant sight i can assure you :lol:
That sounds pretty traumatic mate :lol:
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by Stuarty »

bigjack wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I can't stick Colin Hart! I'll give that show a by this week!

Neither can i, he's stuck in a time warp.I once had the unfortunate pleasure of seeing him sprawled out on a sun bed in Vegas and it wasn't a particularly pleasant sight i can assure you :lol:
Please tell me he was wearing his trunks at least :confused:
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by bigjack »

Stuarty30 wrote:
bigjack wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I can't stick Colin Hart! I'll give that show a by this week!

Neither can i, he's stuck in a time warp.I once had the unfortunate pleasure of seeing him sprawled out on a sun bed in Vegas and it wasn't a particularly pleasant sight i can assure you :lol:
That sounds pretty traumatic mate :lol:



It was and still affects me to this day,i can't bring myself to watch any nature programmes in case i see a walrus on a beach :lol:
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by bigjack »

Stuarty30 wrote:
bigjack wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I can't stick Colin Hart! I'll give that show a by this week!

Neither can i, he's stuck in a time warp.I once had the unfortunate pleasure of seeing him sprawled out on a sun bed in Vegas and it wasn't a particularly pleasant sight i can assure you :lol:
Please tell me he was wearing his trunks at least :confused:



Yes thank god he was, budgie smugglers though and he was sort of an orange colour covered in sun tan oil,very traumatic indeed :lol:
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by bennie »

Colin Hart is an old-fashioned journalist with a nose for a story and an ability to get on with strangers. Boxing is lucky to have him.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23169
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by mickey1975 »

bennie wrote:Colin Hart is an old-fashioned journalist with a nose for a story and an ability to get on with strangers. Boxing is lucky to have him.
But his time has passed, Bennie.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by littlepug »

still hate watching the uk broadcast of tyson v douglas because of hart banging on about ali throughout
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by ste1983 »

mickey1975 wrote:
bennie wrote:Colin Hart is an old-fashioned journalist with a nose for a story and an ability to get on with strangers. Boxing is lucky to have him.
But his time has passed, Bennie.
Definitely, and he doesn't even seem to even want to know/talk about modern boxing.

Its like hes in the 'it was better in my day' brigade and all he wants to do is remind people of that. Now that's great if your watching/reading some sort of historical stuff (I admit hes great for that) but for current boxing hes not got a clue (and doesn't want to).
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by bigjack »

ste1983 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
bennie wrote:Colin Hart is an old-fashioned journalist with a nose for a story and an ability to get on with strangers. Boxing is lucky to have him.
But his time has passed, Bennie.
Definitely, and he doesn't even seem to even want to know/talk about modern boxing.

Its like hes in the 'it was better in my day' brigade and all he wants to do is remind people of that. Now that's great if your watching/reading some sort of historical stuff (I admit hes great for that) but for current boxing hes not got a clue (and doesn't want to).

I agree,he didn't like Lennox Lewis and reckoned he wasn't a puncher :oo ,things were probably better in his day,i.e one champion etc,but as he makes a living out of boxing he surely has to except it how it is now and make the most of it.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by whiskey »

The silver barnet that sticks out at the sides and the thick black eyebrows always reminds me of one of the rarer muppet characters.

Image
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by Ezzard »

Hart seems like a good guy. He's always got his WBCs and WBAs mixed up but so what?

And Pac is nowhere near an all-time welter. Not even close.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by tobyh5 »

Ezzard wrote:Hart seems like a good guy. He's always got his WBCs and WBAs mixed up but so what?

And Pac is nowhere near an all-time welter. Not even close.
I was not arguing if he was or was not worthy of being an all time welter and even said that, I was purely talking about what he said was his reason for not rating him which was inconsistent. If he said, "I have not ranked him as he was simply not top ten" then fair enough but didnt
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by dr_devious »

It was the top 10 WWs since the war. Amazingly one of them didn't include Tommy Hearns in the top 10 and the other had him at 7, he's clearly top 5 all time maybe even 3 behind the two sugar rays
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by gobbles »

dr_devious wrote:It was the top 10 WWs since the war. Amazingly one of them didn't include Tommy Hearns in the top 10 and the other had him at 7, he's clearly top 5 all time maybe even 3 behind the two sugar rays

Really? Apart from Cuevas, who did he beat at welterweight? Hearns better at light-middle.
Robinson has to be top welter, then Leonard, but you have Mayweather, Oscar, Griffith, Cokes, Armstrong, Napoles, even Ted 'Kid' Lewis and Jack Britton.
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: Boxing Matters - Colin Hart

Post by dr_devious »

Who do you think could beat Hearns at WW other than the two Rays, Emile Griffiths maybe Gavilan?
Post Reply